It would not give him 100 goals... is he pacing for 300 shots?
You sound very whiny, all I did was point out that he is shooting at an unsustainable pace.
I don't think about the Habs because they are irrelevant, but some people need to be shown that certain trends are not sustainable since they can not figure it out themselves, you're welcome.
He is pacing for ~240 shots, and with his normal shooting percentage, that is an amazing 30 goals (which is good for him).
He might hit 40 this year, but this thread is premature, but at least Habs fans have come back down to earth about Hutson.
last year he had
314 shots, he not going to fall back to 240 shots. Hes a shooter, more experienced, is playing top line minutes, and now has a healthy shoulder. He may even get more than 314.
The point of the thread was to show that hes scoring at an elite level in his past 20 games or so. Its worth mentioning whether his name is Cole Caufield or Auston Matthews.... And its not as if theyve been lucky goals, hes sniping one-timers and picking corners as elite goal scorers do.
God forbid someone living in the league's biggest fanbase mention one of, if not, the best goal scoring streak in the league. If I made a topic about say, Mark Stone leading the league points after 10 games would you be be so critical? saying how its not sustainable, blah blah blah.... of course not. Do we understand each other?
Get over it, man. This a hockey forum. If a certain topic bothers you because its Habs related then IGNORE IT. Unbelieve how you people get so triggered and feel the need to diminish anything a Habs player does. Its really pathetic.
Id understand if there were 4 other topics about this, but there isnt. So whats the freakin problem??