Yer right. Donnie is here to stay.........I have sincerely appreciated your insight into Bo, but this caught my attention. More proof that Granato is going nowhere anytime soon.
After all he's a defensive genius . Right?
Yer right. Donnie is here to stay.........I have sincerely appreciated your insight into Bo, but this caught my attention. More proof that Granato is going nowhere anytime soon.
I mean he's still a major upgrade over who I would consider our bottom 3 weird people were ready to give up on Mitts in the middle of the last season and seem to overblow everything this year and say stuff like Cozens can only play wing when he was fine last year playing center which we are much deeper then we are at D and we don't really have anything coming up at all on D compared to forwards.You haven't watched him much this season right? He's been a disappointment on D.....
Well actually, so has the rest of the Avalanche D. Georgiev is nicknamed Fourgiev because game in and game out, its 4 goals scored on him.
Stupid fans blame George. Smart fans see that the Avs D hangs their goalie out to dry too often because they cannot handle an intense forecheck.
Could be contract talks broke down, or they viewed him as expendable with the glut of forward prospects getting close to ready for the NHL. We may never know for certain, but with Tage and Cozens signed long term it could be hard to justify another 6 or 7 million to a center who realistically should be top 6 and if Cozens and Tage revert to form he might not get the opportunity for.i know why the Avs traded him. I don't know why the Sabres traded Mitts.
Reasonable. I do believe finances were an issue.Could be contract talks broke down, or they viewed him as expendable with the glut of forward prospects getting close to ready for the NHL. We may never know for certain, but with Tage and Cozens signed long term it could be hard to justify another 6 or 7 million to a center who realistically should be top 6 and if Cozens and Tage revert to form he might not get the opportunity for.
You started this by coming in here and, in your first post, telling any of us who had a bad opinion on the trade that that we were essentially pessimistic jerks who make the boards worse by simply saying our opinion of the deal and now you are acting like you are the victim here? That's rich.
My opinion was the second message. If I came across as telling people how to feel, I apologize because that's not right of me. But what I meant was in reference to the blatant negativity that had really nothing to do with the trade itself and didn't advance the discussion. Apologies for the nuisance today.Nope, no issue with stating opinion on the trade. Its the negativity about everything related and unrelated to the trade that is just toxic and doesn't advance any discourse about the team moving forward. It serves no purpose and is depressing to read. I can already see from some of the responses to my post that I should give up while ahead and just stay away from here.
Guess it's time for Reinhart or Mittelstadt to win a Cup now, huh ? Lol#1 prospect pool for six or seven years running with **** all to show for it.
Watch the finals be FLA v COL
Pretty sure Reinhart had said he didn't want to re-sign. It was Botterill who should have signed Reinhart long term.Another similarity between Reinhart and Mitts… neither of them were ever offered a contract by Adams.
In case you didn’t notice it’s trade deadline week - we have a 4c hole bc our season is over and we’re trading pieces away - we’ll have 3-4 more holes by Friday. The 4c will get got for next season in the offseasonIf anything Krebs needed to be traded for a heavier veteran and more responsible checking C. We don't even have a 4th C now, let alone a better and more experienced one. It's a major roster hole now. To try and mitigate that problem with a cap space argument (we should have 3-5 mil in cap space even if we re-signed Mitts), or pumping up Byram who won't be taking ice time or role away from Dahlin/Power anyway, just doesn't sway the narrative.
Posters are pissed and the reason is completely valid.
This will likely be a contrarian opinion, but I agree. Cozens gave us one very good offensive year as a center, and Tage gave us 2. But it required the team to play an all gas, no brakes style because they struggled so badly defensively.Are Thompson and cozens actual centers on a cup contender? Or are they more wingers? (Besides ostland all the prospects likely end up on the wing as well)
Mittlestat is 2nd line/middle center on a cup contender
I think Byram will at least be an enjoyable player to watch. We haven't had much of that this season. He's loaded with talent, and at 22 has plenty of upside. He has a gang of Canadian WJC pals, so he should fit right in. Who knows, maybe his swagger and moxey will rub off on Power?I will say, that the Sabres used proper asset management with a glut of center depth both in the NHL and in their prospect depth. So trading out Mittelstadt makes perfect sense. I would have preferred it to be for a natural right handed shot defensemen. I looked at some of the metrics after watching some of the trade break down stuff, and it seems he's on the upswing in the last calendar month. He also has more points on his off side, which he's (Byram) has been playing for a large portion of the year. He has a few games he sat out and a minor LBI this season and has played the most games in a single season to date. I still don't like the trade, but I might have been too harsh.
Spot on.This will likely be a contrarian opinion, but I agree. Cozens gave us one very good offensive year as a center, and Tage gave us 2. But it required the team to play an all gas, no brakes style because they struggled so badly defensively.
This year, Granato tried to get them to focus on defense. Which, is somewhat understandable. They were never winning the Cup with their top 2 centers playing defense like that.
Problem is, it failed. Miserably. Cozens still sucks defensively, and now his offense is gone. And while there's been some improvement in Tage's defensive metrics, it's come at the expense of his offense.
The problem, in my opinion, is that neither player really has the defensive IQ to be a top 6 center. In that role, you're often left covering other teams' top 6 centers, and Tage/Cozens just can't do that. Having the ability to play defense at that level is a skill unto itself. And Tage/Cozens don't have it. Honestly, I've never seen any reason to believe either player can do that consistently.
Maybe I'll ultimately be proven wrong. Maybe they'll bring in a veteran coach who brings in some better system and yells at guys and stuff, and that gets them to try harder. Honestly, I'd be thrilled if they did. But I don't really see it. Fundamentally, I think they're just trying to jam square pegs into round holes.
The better move, in my opinion, would've been to keep Mitts, a player that can actually play well in all three zones, and try to add another one of him, so we can move Tage/Cozens back to wing. From there, they can simplify their games and focus on the things they do well (driving offense), without having to worry about covering the Barkovs, Points, and Hughes of the world.