CAUFIELD
Registered User
- Oct 16, 2015
- 904
- 1,376
I like (Can’t like anymore since the scheifele hit ). Thanks for the supportI am pulling for the habs vs Jets and leafs both.
I like (Can’t like anymore since the scheifele hit ). Thanks for the supportI am pulling for the habs vs Jets and leafs both.
It may backfire, but I'd very much like to see Geekie or (and my preference) Lorentz can do in Foegele's spot in a scoring line. Lorentz in particular can throw his weight around a bit and is able to drive offensive play from what I've seen. Put him on a line with a scorer and good things could happen.
SNL hasn't been good since the 90s. Its about time it made a comebackStaal, Necas and Lorentz would be fun
Through 11 games in the overall series, Tampa has been held to just 13 5v5 goals. Florida gave up nearly as many (12) in the 6 games last round. Defense, forwards and going by xGA, goalies, are doing great. Continue keeping the penalty count low and the rest of the series should be decided by the bounces, even with the rash of injuries up front.
+1
lol: someone on the Bolts board called Canes a “boring team”. I’ll take a boring win any day.
btw: anyone have a sense on when NN or Foegle could return?
Also, I wonder if Paquette is fully healed?
Don't expect to see Nino vs Tampa. Most likely to early to know about Foegele.
Lorentz has a number of "almost" moments ala Foegele, too, but appears to get less discouraged by them.It may backfire, but I'd very much like to see Geekie or (and my preference) Lorentz can do in Foegele's spot in a scoring line. Lorentz in particular can throw his weight around a bit and is able to drive offensive play from what I've seen. Put him on a line with a scorer and good things could happen.
SNL hasn't been good since the 90s. Its about time it made a comeback
Lorentz seems to be able to create chances pretty well. More so than Foegs, at least in my opinion. Put him on a line with someone like Staal or Necas and he could collect assists like candy. And him being physical could help open up some space for the other guys on that line.Lorentz has a number of "almost" moments ala Foegele, too, but appears to get less discouraged by them.
Totally agree. He reminds me of a Lab..boundless energy with a let's do it again mentality and just keeps going for it. Whereas, Foegs can get a little downtrodden looking if he has a misstep.Lorentz seems to be able to create chances pretty well. More so than Foegs, at least in my opinion. Put him on a line with someone like Staal or Necas and he could collect assists like candy. And him being physical could help open up some space for the other guys on that line.
Totally agree. He reminds me of a Lab..boundless energy with a let's do it again mentality and just keeps going for it. Whereas, Foegs can get a little downtrodden looking if he has a misstep.
I agree with the rest of your statement, but this part annoys me every time I hear it. I likes the Fleury for Hakanpaa trade straight up, because Hawk is a better fit for our roster than Fleury, and provides a necessary stabilizing defensive presence on the 3rd line to really shore up the defense as a whole.Yes, Fleury was a good young asset, however, Francis was likely ready to pick him up for free at the ED, so getting a 6th on top of Hakanpaa was quite a decent piece of business.
I agree with the rest of your statement, but this part annoys me every time I hear it. I likes the Fleury for Hakanpaa trade straight up, because Hawk is a better fit for our roster than Fleury, and provides a necessary stabilizing defensive presence on the 3rd line to really shore up the defense as a whole.
But I cannot get on board with Fleury being expendable because Francis was going to pick him. Well, great. Now Francis gets to take someone else, so if that was the intention here, we traded for a pending UFA, gave away an asset that probably would have been leaving anyway, and are now set to lose another asset currently on the team through the ED. That... doesn't seem like good planning if that's the intention here.
At one point the issue of not losing Fleury to Seattle made sense. But after Fleury didn't continue to improve on the promise he showed at the end of last season (I'd argue he actually went backwards) that narrative is completely illogical to me.
The argument is that we needed to trade Fleury so we wouldn't lose him to Seattle. But his value is Hakanpaa + a 6th round pick (give or take). Wouldn't we be thrilled if all that Seattle ended up with was Hakanpaa + a sixth round pick? By the transitive property, we should have been thrilled if all that Seattle ended up with was Fleury, as well. I guess once we latch onto a narrative it's hard to let it go, regardless of changes.
What you need is a tattoo.If anyone tells me to take off my canes sweater I’ll do so just to reveal a canes shirt underneath.
At one point the issue of not losing Fleury to Seattle made sense. But after Fleury didn't continue to improve on the promise he showed at the end of last season (I'd argue he actually went backwards) that narrative is completely illogical to me.
The argument is that we needed to trade Fleury so we wouldn't lose him to Seattle. But his value is Hakanpaa + a 6th round pick (give or take). Wouldn't we be thrilled if all that Seattle ended up with was Hakanpaa + a sixth round pick? By the transitive property, we should have been thrilled if all that Seattle ended up with was Fleury, as well. I guess once we latch onto a narrative it's hard to let it go, regardless of changes.