I dont know what you mean by unstable mess? are players not getting their paycheques?
Are you talking about Canucks willing to trade disgruntled players?
What difference is that with Colorado being cheap and willing to trade franchise players?
which one is more unstable?
For High End free agents it always comes down to the following
1. Family Happiness in the city they will live in
2. Quality of life
3. Money
4. Cup Chances
3 and 4 can interchange at times.
Franchise player? No offense but this is an outsiders perspective that seemingly a lot of people share that will be proven false probably sooner rather than later.
This is what I wrote a few days after the trade :
This is my personal take on it. To me, it's pretty obvious what happened. For the first 7-8 years, Mikko Rantanen was a very productive player who would put in a solid effort and would get rewarded nightly. No one would ever mistake him for a Selke candidate but he'd at least give it a go and could be 'adequate' defensively and when you add that to his production, it was a winning combination.
Then about 2-3 years ago, something happened - Nathan MacKinnon took his game to another level. Nate went apeshit with his game in a good way so much so that gradually, little by little over time, Mikko kinda noticed that he didn't have to do nearly as much work and he was still getting his points. Since Mack was already doing all the heavy lifting and was on such a tear, he could kind of half-ass it at times and kind of get away with it because he was still putting up points. For me, this went on ALL of last season and pretty much almost all of this season as well though I think Mikko's been better this year than last year.
So then, when Mikko would get placed on the 2nd line in order to try and balance out the scoring as we've seen at various times this season - it never worked because Rantanen knew that if it didn't work-out almost immediately, Bednar would just put him back with MacKinnon on the top line after a period or two anyways. It was never in his best interest to NOT play with Nate and to be honest, I think there are a TON of players of who have probably done the same.
To be fair here - I don't think Nate cared AT ALL that he had to do the 'heavy lifting' or whatever. I think he just loved playing with Mikko.
Even after ALL of that - C-Mac was still prepared to make Mikko the highest paid winger in the NHL. Imagine that, the highest paid winger in the cushiest spot possible.
In the end, Mikko overplayed his hand. I'm quite certain he figured that he'd be there holding firm on his number in the wee hours of June 30th right before the start of free agency just like his pal Gabe was. I don't think he thought there was a chance in hell they would trade him during the season.
How will they ever sell tickets now ???
![sarcasm :sarcasm: :sarcasm:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/ssst.gif)
A shout-out to C-Mac and all others who saw the same thing I did.
In the past, Mikko has been able to elevate his game with MacKinnon out of the lineup but we haven't really seen that player since the Avs won the Cup. So in the end, it had nothing to do with the Avs
'being cheap' and everything to do with not overpaying for a player who's drive had maybe waned over time and they accurately evaluated it was better to move on, especially if you're getting a package with a player like Necas back in return. There's a chance Mikko gets his mojo back and wants to show the world that he's in that top tier and deserves top money - he's certainly talented enough to do it - but there's also a chance that he's got his Cup and now he wants his money and we'll see where that goes.