Mez
Registered User
- Nov 16, 2017
- 11,571
- 15,327
"as a fan of a team that would massively benefit from the cap being removed....remove the cap,"Get rid of the cap.
"as a fan of a team that would massively benefit from the cap being removed....remove the cap,"Get rid of the cap.
"as a fan of a team that would massively benefit from the cap being removed....remove the cap,"
Man I could imagine no cap during the Chia years in Edmonton. 150mil payroll and still a horrible club"as a fan of a team that would massively benefit from the cap being removed....remove the cap,"
I pay for cable and am incensed that ESPN (who has pocketed 5-10 bucks a month from our grandparents and parents for the last 40 years - read your cable bill), has decided to put some games on a streaming only platform espn+ In order to watch every NYR game cable is no longer enough. It's only a handful of gamed but it's F'd upThis is a huge reason why right here. The fact I’m able to watch every NHL team but my hometown team is insane.
Sign up for sportsnet now... The following year, you actually are gonna need sportsnet now plus. It's the most expensive sport to play and the hardest to find a way to legally watch at times. They have put advertising and scoring above all else. The penalties called for hooking or slashing on an opponents stick are beyond soft, the puck over the glass and goalie trapezoid have not worked as expected and 3 on 3 is a game of keep away.People no longer have cable. It is impossible to watch in market teams without cable.
Viewership is down.
I wonder why?
Go watch a few NBA games and you'll realize how much better we have it.Dont forget terrible reffing and terrible game management.
Why would this be the case? There are endless ways you can set up a luxury tax but this is how the nba's works. The money spent above the cap by the team is then redistributed between the teams that did not exceed the limit. So in that situation certain owners would take in more money due to the increase spending of others.At the end of the day the total spent on salaries will not change. All you are doing is moving around who spends it.
Owners are not dropping down from 50% HRR. So if some teams spend $100 mill plus then others need to be much lower.
Players have been complaining when escrow pushed double digits in percentage. Nhl isn’t going to leave the cap at $82.5 mill and then teams go and spend another $15-$20 on top of that. Escrow would get way too large for the players.
You’d see a drop in the cap ceiling down to closer to $70 mill and for those who opt to pay above that will be another 50% or whatever they opt to spend into a tax.
Nhl would have to rework how things operate but imo so long as the owners get their 50% they should be fine though I’m sure some of the smaller market owners or less wealthy would prefer that they all be able to spend the same amount. But if 3/4 agree to a luxury tax then it can pass.
I don't think the stuff you mention matters at all to most people.So he's calling out who? No one. He's calling out hockey in general and giving no ideas or possible solutions.
Grow a sac CC. Call out Bettman, call out the owners.
Hey, here's A thought, call out your fellow players: stop being jock, meat head, bullies. Stop using your athlete status to prey on women. Stop looking the other way when your teammate is sexually assaulted, stop with the code of silence to cover up dirt bag predators who share the locker room with you. I mean, that sort of shit turns me away from the league much more than anything he mentioned.
But I suppose, in the mind of a hockey player, the real enemy will always be math.
f*** YOU MATH!!
Don't think we should remove the cap. We should just move to something like the NBA uses. There is a cap but there is flexibility to make things work on your team. A soft cap allows for more freedom."as a fan of a team that would massively benefit from the cap being removed....remove the cap,"
It's true. Just an endless string of players with zero personalities. I mean, McDavid is almost laughable with how boring he is. Just wallpaper paste.the biggest main stream star the NHL has had since Gretzky is Gritty.
Get rid of the instigator. Bring back enforcers. The game needs more characters not a bunch of boring 4th liners who don't hit fight or score. Just dump the puck and try not to get scored on. More divisional play. Only play other conference once a year.He's not wrong but it's much easier to complain about things than it is to offer solutions.
Yes, we need better rivalries but what do you propose to do to make them better?
Yes, the NHL needs more trades but how?
etc.
And too many math equations?!? Ahh...
Sportsnet now doesn't work if you live in the market of the team you're trying to watch. They black it out because they want you to pay for cable. The opposite is true if you live out of market. There, they black out games on cable, forcing you to stream instead. It's all super convoluted and f***ed up. It's like they want to scare fans away.Sign up for sportsnet now... The following year, you actually are gonna need sportsnet now plus. It's the most expensive sport to play and the hardest to find a way to legally watch at times. They have put advertising and scoring above all else. The penalties called for hooking or slashing on an opponents stick are beyond soft, the puck over the glass and goalie trapezoid have not worked as expected and 3 on 3 is a game of keep away.
Having said that I still enjoy watching when my team plays but often I will end up watching basketball or football if there is a big game on.
- any time a team has quality star players the conversation always turns to how they will keep them and manage the cap. Sometimes quality players are traded for nothing for cap reasons
I don't think the stuff you mention matters at all to most people.
Get rid of the cap.
He's not wrong.
I don't disagree. Lack of rivalries and a stagnant cap that has frozen the trade market is a problem.
Goal scoring has gone through the roof and imo hockey is not actually in a better state. I didn't really want goal scoring to go up across the board massively, I just wanted the stars to be able to do great things according to the rules. 1/4 of the forwards being a ppg isn't what I was picturing.
Also the edge is really, really lacking. For every intense, heated game there are 20 corporate/social pandering nights. It's always been about the money but it's never been this in your face that it's about the money.
It isn't all bad, the fact that comebacks are very possible is fun - but there's definitely a lack of intrigue. I also think there's too many teams and there should not have been an increase from 30, but whatever.