No there isn't a few teams in that situation. Most teams once they sign their RFAs will over the floor, and the few that aren't are expected to be spenders on July 1.
22/32 team are already over the floor. Of the remaining 10... 4 more would reach the floor by doing no more than filling out their roster with league min. contracts (and this is just to the min. 20-man roster)... so that leaves 6...
TEAM | AMOUNT UNDER
CAP FLOOR | ROSTER SIZE /23 AND
MIN. SALARY TO REACH
20-MAN ROSTER | KEY UFAs/RFAs | NOTES |
---|
Flames | 2.9m | 18 [$1,550,000] | RFAs: Frost, Zary, Bahl
UFAs: None | |
Hurricanes | 4.4m | 19 [$775,000] | RFAs: None
UFAs: Orlov, Burns | Contender with room to spend |
Blackhawks | 6.1m | 20 [$0] | RFAs: Kurashev
UFAs: Donato, Martinez | were bigger spenders last summer |
Ducks | 13.8m | 16 [$3,100,000] | RFAs: McTavish, Dostal, Helleson | said they no longer will be pinching pennies |
Blue Jackets | 16.4m | 17 [$2,325,000] | RFAs: Voronkov, Tatarsov
UFAs: Provorov, Fabbro | have spent the last couple years, no reason to think they won't this summer |
Sharks | 17m | 17 [$2,325,000] | RFAs: None
UFAs: Georgiev | Last summer they added Toffoli and Wennberg, I suspect this summer they spend a little on defense. |
So there is 1 team, that
might have issues and that still seems highly unlikely.
Re: the Weber deal... you're ignoring that Utah gave up a decent prospect and a young RFA defenseman as well, so no, Utah didn't "score" anything