gorangers0525
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2014
- 2,751
- 687
Conducting interviews sucks almost as much as going on interviews. Almost everybody, even those who give near perfect interviews, think they bombed. While HR tasks are only a small part of my job, I've found a lot more weaknesses in candidates references than their interviews.
References? Really? Isn't that usually people that say good things about you?
You’re reading too far into it. Usually the HR person controlling that isn’t the one you interviewed with. I’ve had Goldman Sachs website say they were interested in me a couple times then when my resume gets moved to someone in the field I’d get rejected.Everyone seems to have disappeared from this thread. I thought I did really well in my interview now it's up to them.
BTW, I closed my browser and reopened it and the job posting now said that the status was changed and not on the career page. This happened after my interview. I thought it was weird but then again I didn't refresh it before so maybe that's been the case for a while. But is that weird, is that a good sign? A bad sign? Am I reading too much into it?
You’re reading too far into it. Usually the HR person controlling that isn’t the one you interviewed with. I’ve had Goldman Sachs website say they were interested in me a couple times then when my resume gets moved to someone in the field I’d get rejected.
Just network.
Basically everything else is bull****.
Reggie my friend, my buddy, my pal, shall we exchange info?Just network.
Basically everything else is bull****.
Everyone seems to have disappeared from this thread. I thought I did really well in my interview now it's up to them.
BTW, I closed my browser and reopened it and the job posting now said that the status was changed and not on the career page. This happened after my interview. I thought it was weird but then again I didn't refresh it before so maybe that's been the case for a while. But is that weird, is that a good sign? A bad sign? Am I reading too much into it?
Reggie my friend, my buddy, my pal, shall we exchange info?
My wife may be on the cusp of a tremendous job opportunity in Los Angeles. I'm so excited for her. The challenge for us would be what happens with my career. California is the rare state attorneys cannot waive into -- they have to pass the state bar exam regardless of their standing in other jurisdictions and that process can take months. Also, my firm does not have a California office. I could go in-house but I'm on partner track here and weary of giving that up "too soon." We've of course talked through this and the different possibilities. At the end of the day, we both trust my ability to eventually find something in California that will make me happy. And she has given up a lot to stay in the States so this is the least I could do for her. I suppose the biggest challenge is navigating my disdain for uncertainty.
Of course, all this would be moot if they blow her out of the water with an insane offer, or make her no offer at all.
Reading way too far into it.
Even if they potentially said we have our person for this job, they still have to hire them. Pass any backgrounds, agree to salary, etc. if anything there is a lag on pulling these jobs down.
Yeah, that's why it's weird. Why would they take it down before the whole process goes through. I just don't understand why they pulled it down then.
When in doubt, always assume stupidity.
Corporations, thought to be well oiled machines, are actually largely dumb and crippled by bureaucracy.
Yeah, I worked for a Fortune 100 company recently and I was shocked at how poorly run some aspects of it were.
My wife may be on the cusp of a tremendous job opportunity in Los Angeles. I'm so excited for her. The challenge for us would be what happens with my career. California is the rare state attorneys cannot waive into -- they have to pass the state bar exam regardless of their standing in other jurisdictions and that process can take months. Also, my firm does not have a California office. I could go in-house but I'm on partner track here and weary of giving that up "too soon." We've of course talked through this and the different possibilities. At the end of the day, we both trust my ability to eventually find something in California that will make me happy. And she has given up a lot to stay in the States so this is the least I could do for her. I suppose the biggest challenge is navigating my disdain for uncertainty.
Of course, all this would be moot if they blow her out of the water with an insane offer, or make her no offer at all.
You know where I work and I couldn't begin to start with how screwed up we are.
Are you sure? Have you heard the good news of our lord and savior ADA?I don’t want to hear about DeAngelo all day.
We had close to 20 million dollars worth of equipment coming in for a project but because the higher ups were too nervous about waiting for it all to arrive in December we were getting it piece by piece for months. We could have sent it to a warehouse, but no, it had to go to 4 utilities. We were looking for missing equipment for months.
I understand the uncertainty, but would y'all even WANT to live in California?
I couldn't even begin to think about living there, just on cost of living alone. Not to mention, the state is the antithesis of almost all my thinking.
Sounds like you worked for the government.
I can give you one thing without going into too much detail. I was working on a data "correction" project. In order to "correct" some null data, some "manager" made the decision to default address fields. I immediately raised my hand and voice - NO, YOU CANNOT DO THAT. Basically, the old two wrongs don't make a right thing. Well, I was overruled and was told never to question things like that ever again (even though all the corporate BS nonsense training says to raise your hand immediately, and my job is like, ensuring the data is correct...). Anyway, I read a few months ago in the Wall Street Journal that we're getting a big *** fine from the Federal Government for defaulting address data...