CBJ sends Prout and then they can flip Ryan Murphy for Girardi because they will think Jarmo meant Ryan Murray. CBJ takes this to the bank and laughs
If Bill Peters doesn't like him, I can't see Babcock liking him. We need to upgrade on Hunwick/Polak but I am not sure Murphy is the kind of bottom pairing D you want.
We don't need him but we also don't need Burmistrov either...
Burmistrov
Murphy
Both of the bolded are good insights.
I agree.
Is Murphy a better option than Paul Postma right now?
I'd agree with the first, but not as much with the second.
Our third pairing with those two is a bit of mess.
We don't need him but we also don't need Burmistrov either...
Burmistrov
Murphy
We don't need him but we also don't need Burmistrov either...
Burmistrov
Murphy
"Carolina's Ryan Murphy is a different story. He doesn't seem to be a fit for Hurricanes head coach Bill Peters. Murphy's name has been used as trade bait for months, but now the Canes are actively shopping him. With a salary of $750,000 this year and $825,000 next season, the 23-year-old, right-shot defenceman will likely be on the move."
http://www.tsn.ca/dreger-report-marner-working-magic-for-maple-leafs-1.611286
I can only see him moving for waiver fodder or an old, overpaid player to a team that really needs some cap space. And I don't see why Carolina would take on a guy like that.
In my somewhat limited viewing of him, I don't think he is the type of guy that is going to cut it in the NHL. His style doesn't work for a bottom pair defenseman, and he isn't good enough to be a top four guy. He just screams AHL lifer to me.
Murphy for Hunwick/Polak
Maybe I'm misreading, but I think his point is that players like Murphy don't make great 3rd pairing guys. Namely, he's not good defensively and isn't good enough offensively to be a specialist.
Actually, come to think of it he reminds me a lot of Hunwick back when he was in Boston. Except Hunwick was better then.