Tkachuky
Registered User
I mean Nino is a an average middle six winger so it's not a huge loss.
Imo he’s a solid second line player. The return as it stand is very mediocre
I mean Nino is a an average middle six winger so it's not a huge loss.
But this is NOT it. This is way too simplistic of a way to look at it. Don't you get it? You're supposed to compare to other possible return - Surely Rask wasn't the best they could get. As they got less value than Niederreiter was worth, it's a lost trade.What Niederreiter is doing in Carolina should be an irrelevant consideration for the Wild, particularly when he's in such a favorable situation (EV next to a center producing at a high end level + 1st PP minutes). Lindholm's performance in Calgary doesn't have meaning for my evaluation of the trade with Calgary. HF, which is obsessed with declaring winners and losers, will make a big deal out of it, but you have to be more pragmatic in evaluating the decision making behind these trades; it's not as if Waddell called up Fenton and talked him into it. The pertinent questions to answer are:
1. Are the Wild better off with Rask and the $1.25 mil in cap instead of Niederreiter?
He's just what Aho needed. A guy who will work hard to retrieve the puck (Williams is similar in that regard as well which is why the Nino-Aho-Williams line is working so well) then basically shoot as much as possible. Aho and Teravainen were good together but they both wanted to pass up shots too much of the time to their detriment.He looks like he is enjoying playing with Aho, and vice versa
But this is NOT it. This is way too simplistic of a way to look at it. Don't you get it? You're supposed to compare to other possible return - Surely Rask wasn't the best they could get. As they got less value than Niederreiter was worth, it's a lost trade.
I'm not going to defend this trade or the return, but Fenton was shopping the guy for months. The fact that 29 other teams didn't make a better offer doesn't reflect well on most of them either.But this is NOT it. This is way too simplistic of a way to look at it. Don't you get it? You're supposed to compare to other possible return - Surely Rask wasn't the best they could get. As they got less value than Niederreiter was worth, it's a lost trade.
Will never know if that's trueI'm not going to defend this trade or the return, but Fenton was shopping the guy for months. The fact that 29 other teams didn't make a better offer doesn't reflect well on most of them either.
I suppose not. I guess I'm still hoping that Fenton felt the need to make the trade when he did, though I don't understand why, and that he took the best that he could get. I'm also assuming that any offers he had midseason included bad cap coming back, so maybe it was a bounce-back candidate in Rask vs a 2nd + a 3-year cap dump.Will never know if that's true
I'm not going to defend this trade or the return, but Fenton was shopping the guy for months. The fact that 29 other teams didn't make a better offer doesn't reflect well on most of them either.
All this time searching for the perfect soulmate and all he really needed was Aho to complete him.He looks like he is enjoying playing with Aho, and vice versa
Skinner at least had an NMC that he had to waive, didn't he? "Choosing" Buffalo was probably a shrewd move going into a contract year, at least from where I'm sitting.Same concept applies to the Skinner trade that the Canes get mocked for. If he was worth more, why didn't any other GM of a team he was willing to play for offer up more?
I find it hard to label trading a player for market value a fleecing.
He hasn't played a ton of games for us, but the only things he's done reliably are cough up the puck and point at guys.Wasn’t Nino being shopped around the league and finding it hard to keep a spot in the top 9? I think everyone had plenty of chances on this guy. Canes were willing to chance the salary and see if he could turn it up.
It did seem obvious that he could get his groove back, as compared to Rask. Rask actually is a pretty dependable two way center, you just can’t count on him to drive the offense.
Analytics isn’t exactly our GMs cup of tea, from what I’ve heard. However, we have a very good analytics program.What exactly qualified Fenton to run an NHL team?
And does Minny not have a pro scouting or analytics department?