Finally, a bright side.What’s this? If they wanted crap, the oilers could’ve offered more with Lucic.
Finally, a bright side.What’s this? If they wanted crap, the oilers could’ve offered more with Lucic.
Even if it was your last instinct you'd be right.....First instinct is Minny lost the trade
He's a top 10 play-driver in the NHL.
You can make fun of "advanced" stats all you want, but shot differential and goal differential are important.
Let me know when Rask has scored 50.I'm gonna go ahead and call bull**** on this... he's never even scored 60 points in the NHL.
I don't want to get into semantics behind the term "play-driver" either, using that as a metric is ambiguous af
Since the start of the 11-12 season, the Wild are 27th in shot differential.
Hard for something to get you somewhere when you don't do it.
No, he hasn'tNot the doghouse, he’s been flat out terrible for two years.
Patently untrue.And they've averaged more shots than their opponents per game throughout all but like two of those seasons. Number of shots don't matter. It's one of the most useless stats there is. Right next to +/-. It's common to see teams get outshot and still win.
Patently untrue.
They finished 29th, 19th, 22nd, 16th, 21st, 15th, and 30th those years, and currently sit 13th.
For a generation, people have been telling Minnesota fans their team is mediocre to awful at shot differential, and for a generation they've been telling us either 1)they aren't (they are) or 2)it doesn't matter.
Given that the Wild have won two playoff series since the damn war, maybe it does matter.
Other teams couldn't beat that offer?? Good for Carolina.
Let me know when Rask has scored 50.
It's not an ambiguous term. The Wild are a better team in terms of shots, chances, and goals when he's on the ice than when he's not. That's what it means. It's a black and white term.
Either that's not at even strength, or it's simply misinformation.The Wild have outshot their opponents on average for 6 of those 8 years. That’s not patently untrue. I saw the shots for and shots against myself.
I never implied that.I don't care about Rask I'm just addressing the validity of your statement, I never said anything outrageous like Nino is a top-10 play-driver in the game.
And it is super ambiguous because you're implying that Nino is one of the 10 best players in the NHL simply because of shot totals. "Play-drivers" is about as ambiguous as it gets, people can argue that it means an infinite amount of things
I never implied that.
I explained to you what the term means, and you're ignoring that and choosing to interpret it that way.
Either that's not at even strength, or it's simply misinformation.
That's what the term means to you, play-driver isn't a real thing so arguing Nino is a top-10 player at anything is disingenuous and misleading
It is a real term with a very simply meaning. You'll continue to do with it what you please.That's what the term means to you, play-driver isn't a real thing so arguing Nino is a top-10 player at anything is disingenuous and misleading
Yikes for the Wild. Maybe Rask will turn it around, but they definitely should've just kept Nino instead and waited for something better.