Toggle sidebar

Value of: Capspace: who has got it?

Captain Mountain said:
Montreal's currently at 11 mil in cap space with no expensive RFAs or UFAs of note to re-sign. That will go down a bit due to bonus overages, but also doesn't include the last season of Price's LTIRetired contract, so they could have around 20 mil in avaliable room depending on how aggressive they want to get.
Click to expand...
No RFA’s to sign yet, Hutson isn’t far off from a contract
 
HockeyVirus said:
Even the Leafs have a crap ton of cap space. Their entire roster is signed next season outside of Knies (RFA), Marner, Tavares. Assuming Tavares stays him and Knies likely make up the 11M there.

So Leafs would have 14-15M to either sign Marner or replace him with 2-3 forwards
Click to expand...
Tre is a fantastic RFA negotiator but there is no way you are getting Knies signed for less than 4M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doubledose
shello said:
No RFA’s to sign yet, Hutson isn’t far off from a contract
Click to expand...

Montreal has significant money coming off the books the next few offseasons plus the cap is (so far) expected to keep going up. Paying Hutson (even in the 8 figure AAV range) wont be an issue.
 
Captain Mountain said:
Montreal has significant money coming off the books the next few offseasons plus the cap is (so far) expected to keep going up. Paying Hutson (even in the 8 figure AAV range) wont be an issue.
Click to expand...
Yup.
In fact, Montreal always seemed to be planning on spending a lot in 2025, and the rising cap is bad news as it means there will be more competition from other teams that would otherwise be cap constrained.
 
Golden_Jet said:
They also need to sign 2-3 more forwards (to get to 12-13 forwards), with the 14-15 million on top of JT, Knies and Marner.

So the 14-15 million is split between Marner plus 2-3 more forwards.

So not necessarily a crap ton.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I would say that the Leafs are in one of the most precarious situation in the league. You're pretty much forced to either move on from Marner and try to replace him in free agency (you can't) or run back the exact same team.

I also think getting Tavares and Knies for $11 mil is incredibly optimistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick Riddleton, viceroy, Bye Bye Blueston and 2 others
Pretty much everyone has cap space for next year. But that's exactly the problem. Everyone looks like they have money to throw around...on paper...but when that's the scenario, it's going to take a lot more money than people expect to do even the most basic signings, because there's always going to be multiple teams out there with lots of cap space of their own to take shots at anyone they might want to sign. So that cap space is going to disappear quickly, for the teams that actually land the free agents they want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pengineer, Nikkoshine, FrankSidebottom and 2 others
Ledge And Dairy said:
Tre is a fantastic RFA negotiator but there is no way you are getting Knies signed for less than 4M.
Click to expand...

I'm expecting a bridge deal. Our window is next 3 seasons of Matthews contract.

Golden_Jet said:
They also need to sign 2-3 more forwards (to get to 12-13 forwards), with the 14-15 million on top of JT, Knies and Marner.

So the 14-15 million is split between Marner plus 2-3 more forwards.

So not necessarily a crap ton.
Click to expand...

That is where the Leafs graduate prospects. Robertson won't be expensive to re-sign, we have Cowan likely making the NHL, and it's not hard to find cheap gambles in UFA Leafs have been doing it for years to fill in 4th line roles if needed (I think we are good there with prospects).

It's not 14-15m for all of that it is nearly 30M for all of that btw
 
HockeyVirus said:
I'm expecting a bridge deal. Our window is next 3 seasons of Matthews contract.



That is where the Leafs graduate prospects. Robertson won't be expensive to re-sign, we have Cowan likely making the NHL, and it's not hard to find cheap gambles in UFA Leafs have been doing it for years to fill in 4th line roles if needed (I think we are good there with prospects).

It's not 14-15m for all of that it is nearly 30M for all of that btw
Click to expand...

This is what you said earlier, now you’re contradicting yourself.
HockeyVirus said:
So Leafs would have 14-15M to either sign Marner or replace him with 2-3 forwards
Click to expand...
I merely pointed out, that 14-15 million is split between Marner, and 2-3 additional forwards.
This does not include the 11 million you allocated to Knies and JT.
So it is not a crap ton of cap space, once it’s spent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick Riddleton
Porter Stoutheart said:
:nashville


Forsberg ($8.5M) - O'Reilly ($4.5M) - Evangelista (RFA ?$2M?)
Bunting ($4.5M) - Stamkos ($8M) - Marchessault ($5.5M)
Smith ($1M) - McCarron ($0.900M) - Sissons ($2.857M)
L'Heureux ($0.8633M) - Svechkov ($0.925M) - Wiesblatt ($0.775M)
xxx

Josi ($9.059M) - Barron ($1.15M)
Skjei ($7M) - Blankenburg ($0.775M)
Lauzon ($2M) - Wilsby ($0.775M)
Stastney ($0.825M) - Oesterle ($0.775M)

Saros ($7.74M)
Annunen ($0.8375M)
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ. This is worst version of the Preds since like 2013.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston and DaveG
Golden_Jet said:
This is what you said earlier, now you’re contradicting yourself.

I merely pointed out, that 14-15 million is split between Marner, and 2-3 additional forwards.
This does not include the 11 million you allocated to Knies and JT.
So it is not a crap ton of cap space, once it’s spent.
Click to expand...

You are talking about literal 4th liners with those players. As I said, Leafs already have prospects they can use to fill these roles. The 14-15M is not counting giving 4th liners a raise because it should be easy to replace them
 
Habs will project to have 23M in capspace (including Price's LTIR) with 20 players on the roster (assuming mediocre raises for Heineman, Struble, Dobes and Demidov's entry level deal. They will need a veteran bottom pairing dman and a 2C if they can upgrade on Dach.

This assumes Armia, Savard, Pezetta and Dvorak all walk (as they should).
 
HockeyVirus said:
I'm expecting a bridge deal. Our window is next 3 seasons of Matthews contract.
Click to expand...
I think you should expect a bridge deal but it's not going to be under 4M, and Tavares isn't going to get less than 7M (refer to Stamkos). That's 11M right there and I would bet both get more than that

If Toronto has another poor playoffs I wouldn't be surprised if they cut ties with JT in favor of someone like Bennett or bringing back Kadri, or something. AFP Analytics projects them at ~4Mx2, and ~8Mx3 respectively, and Marner at 12.6M
 
Ledge And Dairy said:
I think you should expect a bridge deal but it's not going to be under 4M, and Tavares isn't going to get less than 7M (refer to Stamkos). That's 11M right there and I would bet both get more than that

If Toronto has another poor playoffs I wouldn't be surprised if they cut ties with JT in favor of someone like Bennett or bringing back Kadri, or something. AFP Analytics projects them at ~4Mx2, and ~8Mx3 respectively, and Marner at 12.6M
Click to expand...

The point is we don't need to bring either back. But we can bring both back or some combination of one of them and new players. Lots of flexibility.

Knies is not getting more than 4M on a bridge deal. I would expect he gets a 7AAV deal with term right now. 4M x 2 years most likely.

Tavares is not getting an albatross Stamkos deal from us
 
Sharks have about 45 million in cap space, an that includes 8 million to unofficially retired but not LTIRed Logan Couture and another 4 in retention.

Basically they have about 30 million spent on their actual roster
 
HockeyVirus said:
You are talking about literal 4th liners with those players. As I said, Leafs already have prospects they can use to fill these roles. The 14-15M is not counting giving 4th liners a raise because it should be easy to replace them
Click to expand...
You said 14-15 for Marner left over, then I said ~3 million for the remaining forwards.
Yes when I say 3 million for the rest, at that number they are 4th liners.
(which sounds like you agree with).

So not a ton of a cap space. I’m just using the numbers and players you provided earlier , and then added in the remainder. Seems like your argueing with yourself now, for no reason lol.
 
Golden_Jet said:
You said 14-15 for Marner left over, then I said ~3 million for the remaining forwards.
Yes when I say 3 million for the rest, at that number they are 4th liners.
(which sounds like you agree with).

So not a ton of a cap space. I’m just using the numbers and players you provided earlier , and then added in the remainder. Seems like your argueing with yourself now, for no reason lol.
Click to expand...

Why do you always need to nitpick my comments? You know what I mean. The Leafs can bring back the same team minus Marner and Tavares. Meaning they can spend what they do not on the 4th line next year and be fine.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mick Riddleton and Golden_Jet
Ledge And Dairy said:
I think you should expect a bridge deal but it's not going to be under 4M, and Tavares isn't going to get less than 7M (refer to Stamkos). That's 11M right there and I would bet both get more than that

If Toronto has another poor playoffs I wouldn't be surprised if they cut ties with JT in favor of someone like Bennett or bringing back Kadri, or something. AFP Analytics projects them at ~4Mx2, and ~8Mx3 respectively, and Marner at 12.6M
Click to expand...
At the beginning of the year poster thought 4-4.5 million x 8 would get it done for Knies, most everyone said would be more lol.
 
HockeyVirus said:
Why do you always need to nitpick my comments? You know what I mean. The Leafs can bring back the same team minus Marner and Tavares. Meaning they can spend what they do not on the 4th line next year and be fine.
Click to expand...
Sure if correcting is nitpicking lol,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom