Regardless of trade options they can't have those guys on the ice if they are as ineffective as they were last year. I realize MacLellan said what he said about Backstrom but will he be willing to reach the logical endpoint and scratch him if it comes to it? That is a decision that pretty much ends Backstrom's career even if he's pain-free. It's not an easy decision but it might be one that needs to be made for the team to move forward.
The decision on Kuznetsov should be easier because it'll come down to his level of commitment rather than his pure ability level. If he shows he cares then he plays.
Either way that's a lot of responsibility for a rookie HC and he'll need the public backing of management to make these calls.
I think you misunderstand what I'm saying. GMBM sounds frustrated that Backstrom isn't eyeballing retirement right now and still thinks he just needs time to get back to it. That will happen or it won't, but
if the coaching doesn't want to play a liability you're not going to hear GMBM complain because he knows it's true too. There's no disconnect there, far as I can tell. The team is built to punt dead weight in contract's time and I think they've honestly got recourse to LTIR Backstrom if they're scratching him anyway.
GMBM doesn't need to trade them, he probably doesn't even
want to trade both, he just wants Backstrom to recognize he can't play at the right level anymore and LTIRetire and let Kuznetsov expire. That's the window he's built into their contract situation. He can afford to wait, because a lot of other parts of the team aren't ready anyway. There's one big swing coming, or at least the potential for it, but it comes a little later than this so he's not going to deal from a disadvantage to get rid of contracts he's kind of already planned for by now.