g00n
Retired Global Mod
- Nov 22, 2007
- 31,574
- 16,404
That was our strategy, yes - and one that didn’t really work. The one year we got past the second round we were forced to play younger guys who usually were crowded out - Stephenson, Djoos, Boyd, Vrana, Burakovsky…
And yet we watched the Penguins win two years in a row by pairing their younger players with the Crosbys and Malkins. Tampa has had tremendous success giving guys like Point, Cirelli and Colton NHL playing time when they were promising, but incomplete, players.
How would this narrative flip if we'd gotten past PIT all those years and won Cups in those seasons like they did?
TB and PIT still had vet core and TB circumvented the cap.
I don't think the difference is as vast or damning as it appears to some. IMO our players failed to deliver on the ice for the better part of 10-15 years during a window that should've resulted in more than 1 Cup.
Offense was rarely a problem in that span. We have the best goal scorer in NHL history (pending). During most of that time the main struggle was defense, leadership, and goaltending. One could argue Holtby and Orpik et all made as much of a difference in 2018 as the younger bit players, and probably more.
IMO it's recency bias. We see a slower, older team now and think that youth has always been the answer.