See I read that the opposite way. If the HDSV% is the measure of proficiency vs High Danger shots his sav% is pretty low compared to others, and in general. And the shot distance is fairly tightly grouped except outliers.
Here's the data sorted by HDSV% (worst to best) among goalies with 300 TOI or more (top 31 tenders come from this):
View attachment 396901
That puts VV at 6th worst in the league in high danger areas (Holtby is 2nd worst...woof) by raw stats and the HDGSAA comparing to expectations has him 5th worst. Compared to the regular GSAA, which is fairly close to average or break-even vs the league, it seems VV has issues with those HD chances as well as the longer shots.
What's interesting is if you sort by rebound attempts then VV's avg goal distance sticks out. He gives up a lot of rebounds but the avg goal distance is pretty far out compared to other goaltenders giving up similar numbers or rebounds, which suggests the rebounds are hurting less than expected. High danger shots are probably going straight in with fewer than average rebounds that lead to goals, and some longer shots are also getting right through (possibly from screens). VV has faced a lot of shots vs TOI so the rebounds are likely just teams peppering him to see what gets through.
Also note VV is 13th in the league in total TOI so the overuse concept may be flawed as well.