you think he’s just chasing the biggest dollar amount for here on out? He may be, I dunno.
That said, a 2 year deal on a team or in a place you would rather not be but for a mil or 2 more doesn’t seem as attractive as a shorter deal in a better place/better team and where he could parlay that success into his next deal…
I understand the argument. My position is that, yes, in most cases, I expect professional athletes to make contract-related decisions primarily (but not entirely) based on maximizing their earnings during the prime years of their limited careers. Not necessarily, "I'll take the very best contract I can get, regardless of to whatever bottom-feeding team it takes it me." But often, "Here's the best mix of money AND opportunity."
And I think that, despite all the constant calls/arguments made by fans for these players to sign sweetheart deals (including "Sign a one-year Prove It deal, what could go wrong?" arguments) more often than not they eventually sign contracts that offer more money and better term.
Last edited: