Outbreaks are inevitable. Everyone will get this virus. Even with the vaccines (check the CDC's own literature. They clearly state the vaccines reduce the severity of the illness, but do not prevent you from contracting COVID. When they rolled out the Moderna vaccine at my work last week, the documentation we had to read and sign said the same thing), we will ALL catch it. Trying to avoid COVID altogether would make King Canute laugh at you.
The key is to minimize its impact. Lowering the transmission rates so that hospitals don't get overwhelmed. Lowering the severity of illness, via vaccine or treatment. But every person on this continent will be exposed to this virus and "catch" it (that's how antibodies work... you have to have the infectious disease in your system for the antibodies to be produced to fight it, even after vaccination). So, either we cancel all sports right now until we build up herd immunity (via exposure or vaccine), or we establish policies that take into account what little we do know about this virus and concentrate our efforts on policies that make sense. And policies that say it is OK to sit next to other players on the bench during a game, but not in the same hotel room don't. The difference in viral loads is well below the threshold for infection, so either way you will pass the virus on (and the same HVAC that is circulating the air in their room is circulating that same air throughout the whole hotel). Masks have proven to be startlingly ineffective at reducing transmission in some circumstances (once again, see the CDC's own reports of who gets infected and where), and very effective in others. Creating policies that don't take these realities into account are doomed to fail.
Ovechkin's wife is perfectly right to sneer at the faux-science behind such nonsensical distinctions. What is the NHL's goal? If it is to eliminate transmission of COVID, then don't play! If it is to reduce transmission, then create policies that will work, not just look good (which is what their policies are based on now)...
I'd hate to trade away too much from the cupboard. It'll get bare pretty fast.Now tat LeBrun says the Caps have asked CLB @ PLD...
I would love him on the team, and I'd give up a lot to get him. I've said before that I start at Kuznetsov, a 1st, and Lapierre. They want a young d in there? That's cool. The only piece I try and protect is McMichael.
True, but PLD is 22 years old and a #1C. I'd try to steer them towards Feverbaby or Alexeyev given the depth we have on defense but I wouldn't say no if they insisted on Lapierre.I'd hate to trade away too much from the cupboard. It'll get bare pretty fast.
CBJ did pass on Lapierre for Chinakhov despite organizational weakness at the center position so not sure they're too high on him. I'd meet that price, though. Not sure I'd add Fehervary/Alexeyev but that sort of energetic two-way C would be an ideal top six fit as Backstrom ages and also very likely be a preferred fit for Laviolette. Panik also seems like the sort of winger they'd like, although I don't how far they want to dip into LTIR.
If Montreal includes Kotkaniemi I'd imagine they're the clubhouse leaders.
Actually there is PLENTY of science to support that. For one, minimizing the cumulative amount of time they spend together without masks decreases the risk, that is indisputable. It's like people asking "why should I wear a mask in a restaurant if I'm going to take it off while eating?". Ah, it's a matter of simple statistics. Wearing a mask 50% of the time is better than wearing it 0% of the time. Also, in a hotel room they will be all facing each other (presumably) and there will be more chatter, which increases the risk. Finally, in one scenario it's very feasible to wear it, in the other it is not.
Nobody is saying not to have a social life, just wear the freaking mask. They didn't and knew the rules. There is no hypocrisy.
There is no way you give Kuznetsov away for nothing.
I agree. But maybe Mac could pry away draft picks in exchange for leaving Kuz unprotected.
We don't have the assets for PLD if they're looking for scoring help right away unless you're giving Kuzy up. Not so sure that makes 8 very happy either if that were to happen. He's probably already annoyed with the recent covid incident. Don't want him to flee over spilled milk.
We'd have to wipe the cupboard with futures to score him and that's only if CBJ wants futures.
On the other hand, Dubois has a lower AAV this year and next and it allows them to pay 8 more. He knows it's a business and if that helps the later he'll deal.We don't have the assets for PLD if they're looking for scoring help right away unless you're giving Kuzy up. Not so sure that makes 8 very happy either if that were to happen. He's probably already annoyed with the recent covid incident. Don't want him to flee over spilled milk.
I do want them to keep him but not if continues to underachieve.hard pass....would just keep Kuzy.
I do want them to keep him but not if continues to underachieve.
I don't think the caps will end up offering the best deal here, but man I'd love Backy-PLD-Eller for a few years and then getting CMM in the mix.....
Let's be real, Kuzy will have CBJ on his NTC list, so it would probably hurt.... But Kuzy + LaPierre/AA/hopefully a worse prospect/pick and I'd probably do it.
He's not the only asset we could be trading.Would the caps still inquire if CBJ is indeed on the NTC list? I don't know maybe they would, but seems like a waste of time if kuzy would just nix it.
I'd hate to trade away too much from the cupboard. It'll get bare pretty fast.
He's not the only asset we could be trading.
Not against trading Kuzy to a team for assets to facilitate the trade, hope we don't give up someone like Vrana.
Don't disagree, but who'd be our 2LW then? Kuzy? CMM? Panik?I’d take Dubois over Vrana without hesitation.