dj Mahoney
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2021
- 1,582
- 843
What GOALIE has his resume ?What goalie Fleurys age has ever gotten that return in ANY trade?
What GOALIE has his resume ?What goalie Fleurys age has ever gotten that return in ANY trade?
Cat is a young elite piece on a rebuilding team. He wears a letter. There's no good offer that isn't horribly one sided.No one has done literally any of this. Eichel was used as an establishment of market prices. You can say he’s s unique case, but literally all trades are. He is a valuable context in his own right to the rate of players and picks in this market.
I’m like 12 posts into the conversation still waiting for anyone to provide any alternative offer and comps thst justify it beyond just naysaying.
It’s exceptionally easy to play the game of “wronnnnng, terrible offer”, but folks get tight lipped when asked what a good offer is and why.
Several in the history of the League have his resume and better. They were never traded for anything like what is being bandied about here.What GOALIE has his resume ?
As pure rentals Ryan Miller wasn't Fleury old but he returned a haul.What goalie Fleurys age has ever gotten that return in ANY trade?
Is Matt Murray currently outplaying MAF?Several in the history of the League have his resume and better. They were never traded for anything like what is being bandied about here.
Additionally Matt Murray outplayed Fleury to the extent that Fleury was deemed expendable. He’s also far younger. Is Murray also worth a 1st AND additional picks.
Additionally MAF was never single-handedly a great PO goalie. He was, as much, a product of a good team than anything he ever did himself. Even his successes (fleeting and transient as they have been) in CHI and LV have resulted from solid team defense.You're not paying for the resume, you are paying for current performance. Big difference.
Miller wasn’t traded alone and the amount of success he had afterwards does not make the point you seem to think it does.As pure rentals Ryan Miller wasn't Fleury old but he returned a haul.
I wonder which is benefitting from the better defensive team?Is Matt Murray currently outplaying MAF?
Is Matt Murray currently outplaying MAF?
Question who won the VEZINA last year ?Several in the history of the League have his resume and better. They were never traded for anything like what is being bandied about here.
Additionally Matt Murray outplayed Fleury to the extent that Fleury was deemed expendable. He’s also far younger. Is Murray also worth a 1st AND additional picks.
Yeah he actually is.
Vanacek is better than Samsonov IMO
Samsonov for Fleury should be plenty for Chicago IMO
Are we pretending Steve Ott was some massively valuable piece? And the success afterwards is immaterial if he's a rental. If you're suggesting the Blues gave up too much hey I'm not arguing otherwise.Miller wasn’t traded alone and the amount of success he had afterwards does not make the point you seem to think it does.
I'd say Samsonov+a 2nd is fair.Vanacek is better than Samsonov IMO
Samsonov for Fleury should be plenty for Chicago IMO
Ott was valued at a first by himself at the timeAre we pretending Steve Ott was some massively valuable piece? And the success afterwards is immaterial if he's a rental. If you're suggesting the Blues gave up too much hey I'm not arguing otherwise.
Martin Brodeur is an undeniably better goaltender than Marc-Andre f***ing Fleury and he signed as a Free Agent for Jack Shit at approximately the same point in his career and he had won a Vezina that he deserved far more than Fleury. Any team that trades for Fleury on the hope that he has a Swan Song is betting the House on a Fold.Question who won the VEZINA last year ?
I’d honestly pee a little and then a lot.MAF cup in PIT and WSH do it
I’m suggesting the Blues got played, the Salary Cap was a completely different animal, teams were less loathe to trade High Picks, Ryan Miller was simply a better goalie, Steve Ott was a desirable playoff commodity, basically everything was different in a way that doesn’t support your narrative but if you think the situations are remotely similar, you do you. I’ll choose to live in reality.Are we pretending Steve Ott was some massively valuable piece? And the success afterwards is immaterial if he's a rental. If you're suggesting the Blues gave up too much hey I'm not arguing otherwise.
Actually it’s not just YOUR OPINION. I tend to agree. Fleury’s playoff rep is seemingly being re-written by Hawks fans who don’t really care about the playoffs these days anyways. Honestly, I’d try to trade for Corey Crawford before Marc-Andre Fleury.Just my opinion, I think the Caps would be better off trading for Murray than Fleury. Murray is only 27 and I think the Caps could get the Sens to retain some salary or take a bad contract.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and expose myself for welcome ridicule. I’m going on record Right Now that No Team in the League will pay a 1st (higher than 25) for MAF. Book it.No chance. There are multiple teams looking to bid on Fleury as he's basically the only real starter available for a team with cup aspirations. He is going to go for a pretty penny. You're going to have to give up a first round pick or a comparable asset.
No, the Caps will not add to Samsonov in this scenario.I'd say Samsonov+a 2nd is fair.
No, the Caps will not add to Samsonov in this scenario.