JimEIV
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2003
- 67,701
- 30,526
You'll have to settle for Vanecek.Same, for the same reason.
You'll have to settle for Vanecek.Same, for the same reason.
My biggest issue on MBw is that i dont think he can follow the puck too well. So often when he makes a save/shot misses the net it just looks like he does the butterfly, closes his eyes and hopes he caught the puck. Very little reaction to the gameplay itself.
We were never going to win games needing our goalies to give up 2 or less...just was never going to happen.Like "good version of Blackwood" when he stop the puck? And Devils won it?
from 20-22 shots? easily. Even don`t need above average goile. Just average.We were never going to win games needing our goalies to give up less than 2...just was never going to happen.
You could be right. We saw that with Shero and Hynes.I think the pressure around the organization is at a boiling point. I think if (when) Ruff is fired it won’t be just Ruff to go.
Yeah no....not in this league where average as of this morning was 3.24 goals per game... Just isn't happening.from 20-22 shots? easily.
If the season goes down because of bad goaltending Fitz isn’t to be the GM anymore.
He staked his claim by keeping Blackwood and trading for VV.
Any GM change is going to be bringing someone in from the outside. Maybe two people with a President of Hockey Ops coming in for top job.You could be right. We saw that with Shero and Hynes.
Shero waited way too long to fire Hynes though. Hynes should have been fired when Fitz was sent down to the bench after a winless first 6 games to 19-20.
I do think Ruff should have been let go after last year. I don't think we're at the point where he should have been fired this year yet (not this year, but he probably shouldn't have been back this year to begin with), but if that's prolonged, that could get him whacked like it did Shero.
It's hard to say what's going on. There's been times where I've wondered if Fitz is merely finishing out Shero's second term after Hynes-gate (or something else lol), but I don't think I'm quite right on that.
However, if he is quickly done away with this year or after this year, I'm gonna think maybe that was the case.
I don't want a GM change, I don't want Marty f***in with shit if there is a GM change. I think we need to stay the course right now, but there's some guys that can't be back next year, no matter if we hold their rights and #29 is the biggest offender of the bunch.
from 20-22 shots? easily. Even don`t need above average goile. Just average.
I somehow think Husso was the target. I'm pretty sure the Vanecek trade was announced within an hour of Detroit trading for Husso's rights, then extending him.Coming off the year Blackwood had, the choices are to trade him for some other shitty broken-down goalie or hope he reclaims his form. I doubt his trade value rose after the vaccine debacle last year either.
Given that I don't think the Devils were ever in the running for Kuemper, Campbell, or Fleury, their options on the goalie market were always going to be limited. We're seeing the Leafs go out there with Murray and Samsonov, I don't think Buffalo's goaltending holds up, it's just a real challenge to get goaltending if you didn't have it in the system.
Yeah no....not in this league where average as of this morning was 3.24 goals per game... Just isn't happening.
meh. @Bleedred will tell you better about it, but most of the Blackwood goals were stoppable and after the good start of the game he did stop nothing.When 3 of those shots are the chances we gave up tonight most goalies aren’t stopping it
uhh, I think this has more to do with the other players lack of results lol
meh. @Bleedred will tell you better about it, but most of the Blackwood goals were stoppable and after the good start of the game he did stop nothing.
This is his job. To stop the pucks. I`m not asking to stop every HDC, nobody ask. but part of - absolutley.
average shotting range isn`t what the Devils are doing. It`s working in both ways, Jim. When Devils will miss average level of shots, than we can ask more from defense, much more from offense, less from goalies. Until now - they are not doing their job.Yeah no....not in this league where average as of this morning was 3.24 goals per game... Just isn't happening.
I feel bad for Amanda at this point, she just takes the brunt of criticism cause she has the most thankless job right now, a publicist for a perennially shit team.
He has those ranks and has 1 goal(which came while we were losing 5-1)
Says it all
Bleed is a lunatic who people really need to stop entertaining as some goalie savant
Sorry, but that was a bad argument. Someone can call Jim the same way, but we stay in discussion with him. I understand his frustration. What you did there cost nothing. So you lost me.Bleed is a lunatic who people really need to stop entertaining as some goalie savant
I still need to go back and watch all of them. I don't think the 5th goal was bad.meh. @Bleedred will tell you better about it, but most of the Blackwood goals were stoppable and after the good start of the game he did stop nothing.
This is his job. To stop the pucks. I`m not asking to stop every HDC, nobody ask. but part of - absolutley.
Much as I don’t have great confidence in our goaltending, I really don’t put this loss on the goalies.It`s okay game. Outshot them 41-22, but bad turnovers were really bad. But when your team could give opponents to shot only 22 times, you expact more saves out of that shots.
If they will contunie to dominate on the ice with bad shooting(missed shots, shots in the chest etc) and will play strong defense, but with some bad turnovers here and there, they will win most of the games when goalies will be good, and will lose most of the games when goalies will be bad.
When they will fix their shooting and PP, the dependence on goalies will decrease significantly. When they find consistent goalie, forwards will be able to relax a little and trying to something new. When they fix both components, this team will be power house.
Too many goals for not so many shot to acually remember where there were.I still need to go back and watch all of them. I don't think the 5th goal was bad.
I actually think the Ovechkin one looked not good, but it is Ovechkin. I don't take shooter bias into account when reviewing the goals, but I do think it's okay to not kill the goalie over allowing a one timer to the best goal scorer of all time. However, goalies do make saves on Ovechkin about 85% of his shots.
Goal 2 went off his arm, but it was fairly close range and there was a bit of a moving screen.
Goal 3 was just...... it just beats him. He had a good look at it and it was not from very close at all and it just beats him high blocker (I think?). His glove hand and high blocker are majorly suspect. Unfortunately, I noticed Vanecek was beaten up high on most of his goals in the Detroit game. I can't help but wonder if this is a flaw from Rogalski's teachings.
I'm a little confused on goal 1. It was kind of a back door goal, I think? I forgot already. He wasn't really on his post though.
Some of the goals were very borderline. Like, there was nothing really terrible or softy of the night caliber, There probably wasn't even any as bad as the ones in Philly or that first one to Anaheim, but there were a lot of very borderline goals. That's for sure. Some of these borderline goals hit a good goalie. Blackwood is anything but a good goalie. He's now been bad for just as long as he was good in the NHL, and his entire pro career (with his mediocre AHL career) is probably now more poor than not poor.
Much as I don’t have great confidence in our goaltending, I really don’t put this loss on the goalies.
We played a soft and unfocused game without much effort, and abandoned our system for a lot of aimless solo play; especially we came out in the 2d period lackadaisical and sloppy and we got hammered. Yes it would have been good if Bratt hadn’t shanked that one timer in the power play that ended period one, which was a good set up. But we won’t learn to beat Washington until we play with the kind of sustained effort that we showed in our first win here last week.
This game reminded me of so many crappy efforts during the past 2 seasons, where we got dominated and then made it close in garbage time.
Yes Blackwood laid an egg eventually but the plays in front of him were horrendous on the key goals early in the 2d.
For a talented guy who regularly makes great plays, Severson sucks. Whatever great stuff he gives you he continually subtracts by plays so bad you can hardly believe he can find new ways to make them. That chip into the forward tonight literally turned the game against us. You could see the air go out of our tires. And once it happened we were mentally weak and collapsed, literally quit playing for the key ten minute stretch that lost the game.
And we really have to get Jack Hughes going. What’s wrong with him I don’t know but tonight was as poor as I’ve ever seen him. Plus he looks frustrated and as if he’s trying to do things alone one on five.
But hey we are 3 and 3. Go win the next one.