Salary Cap: Cap Problems next season?

Al14

Registered User
Jul 13, 2007
24,386
5,833
The Canadian dollar just fell hard, so the ~$71M cap projections are being quite generous.



They were RFA's. Tampa would've matched Stamkos for the max, and the Islanders would get 4 1sts before they even consider not matching Tavares.

They could have both signed for shorter terms! They also could have requested to be traded to Toronto. I think they could have done a Kariya? No?

I don't want either Stamkos or Tavares on the downside of their careers! We've done that before with very limited success!
 

MakeTheIronSing

Registered User
Oct 13, 2011
1,299
39
Edmonton
Figured it out.

Off season moves

TOR/SJ: Gardiner + Ashton + Brown for Wingels + Braun

TOR/CGY: Reimer + Biggs + 4th round pick(CGY) '14 for Baertschi + 2nd round pick(COL) '14 + 6th round pick '15

TOR/?: Rights to Cody Franson for 3rd round pick '15 + 5th round pick '14

Signings: G Justin Peters 2 years/$3million - D Zach Redmond 1 year/$1.4million



FORWARDS
James Van Riemsdyk ($4.250m) / Tyler Bozak ($4.200m) / Phil Kessel ($8.000m)
Joffrey Lupul ($5.250m) / Nazem Kadri ($2.900m) / Sven Baertschi ($0.894m)
Jerry D'Amigo ($0.925m) / Dave Bolland ($4.100m) / Tommy Wingels ($2.900m)
Teemu Hartikanen ($1.300m) / Peter Holland ($1.200m) / David Clarkson ($5.250m)
Colton Orr ($0.925m)
DEFENSEMEN
Dion Phaneuf ($7.000m) / Justin Braun ($1.250m)
Carl Gunnarsson ($3.150m) / Morgan Rielly ($0.894m)
Tim Gleason ($4.000m) / Petter Granberg ($0.800m)
Zach Redmond ($1.400m)
GOALTENDERS
Jonathan Bernier ($2.900m)
Justin Peters ($1.500m)
BUYOUTS
Mike Komisarek ($0.000m)
Mikhail Grabovski ($0.000m)
------
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(estimations for 2014-15)
SALARY CAP: $71,100,000; CAP PAYROLL: $64,988,333; BONUSES: $1,481,250
CAP SPACE (22-man roster): $6,111,667

Pretty sure the Flames aren't going to part with Sven Baertschi for that offer. He is one of their only young talents... so there's that.

Clarkson on the 4th line is a pure waste of money.

Justin Peters is a weird choice. I don't see that happening.

Why is Braun going to replace the guy that has been playing with Phaneuf for years?
 

FifthLine

@AHartScout
Jul 2, 2011
2,835
52
toronto
Out:
Bolland
Raymond
Franson
Reimer (Trade)
Gardiner (Trade)

In:
Vet DFD
Komarov
Kule
Mcc
Young Centre (Trade)
 

Primary Assist

The taste of honey is worse than none at all
Jul 7, 2010
6,066
6,088
there is absolutely no way Clarkson is bought out this summer, and he almost certainly won't be traded. The guy pulling the trigger on these moves is Dave Nonis, and it would be tantamount to career suicide if he were to admit he made such a huge mistake with the Clarkson contract by getting rid of him. Not only would this represent cap mismanagement, but it would also cost his bosses millions upon millions of dollars in real money.
 

glue

Registered User
Jan 30, 2006
4,502
2,698
Toronto
I'm not saying to replace Raymond with an upgrade on the 3rd line.

What I'm saying is -- our top 2 lines have to be good enough and consistent enough offensively, that a player in the position of Mason Raymond (likely Peter Holland next year) cannot be as critical to our success as Raymond has been this year.

.

Gotcha..sorry misunderstood...agree completely on that.
 

pspot

Registered User
Dec 20, 2004
10,312
554
Kitchener
if they want to bring essentially the same team back with some internal improvement then they should be okay
 

Faltorvo

Registered User
Feb 18, 2008
21,067
1,941
I don't think it's sitting in with some folks that there is a very real chance that the cap only goes up by 3.7m next season, thanks to our loony tanking.
 

Michael Gary Scott

Toronto Maple Tron's
Apr 27, 2010
5,076
1
Bolland better be good as gone, he'll want too much. Raymond too. I'm fine with losing McClement as long as we keep Kulemin.
 

Patty Lee

I hate the Habs
Nov 26, 2003
10,798
0
Visit site
If we need the cap space, I see no reason why we can't buyout Clarkson.

It would save us

2014-15 $2,958,333
2015-16 $3,708,333
2016-17 $5,208,333
2017-18 $5,208,333
2018-19 $2,958,333
2019-20 $1,458,333
2020-21 -$1,791,667
2021-22 -$1,791,667
2022-23 -$1,791,667
2023-24 -$1,791,667
2024-25 -$1,791,667
2025-26 -$1,791,667
that would be smart....
 

Leafidelity

Existentially Drifting
Apr 6, 2008
38,207
8,525
Downtown Canada
If we need the cap space, I see no reason why we can't buyout Clarkson.

It would save us

2014-15 $2,958,333
2015-16 $3,708,333
2016-17 $5,208,333
2017-18 $5,208,333
2018-19 $2,958,333
2019-20 $1,458,333
2020-21 -$1,791,667
2021-22 -$1,791,667
2022-23 -$1,791,667
2023-24 -$1,791,667
2024-25 -$1,791,667
2025-26 -$1,791,667

Seven years of whining is going to be hard enough, I couldn't handle twelve.
 

Baba Ganoush

Registered User
Dec 8, 2009
6,499
0
If Bolland is for real with the contract demands he can leave. I'd like to see Raymond back but def not if he wants too much $$. I'd be just as happy seeing him replaced with someone like Ott/Downie/Cleary if the price was right. We do need to get tougher.

JVR (4.25) Bozak (4.2) Kessel (8) (approx 16.5)
Lupul (5.25) Kadri (2.9) Clarkson (5.25) (approx 13.5)
Kulemin + any two of Ott/Cleary/Downie/Raymond/Marlie(s) (approx 8)
McClement + Marlie(s)/UFA(s) (approx 4)

Would be ok with a forward group like that. As for the D, there aren't many FA's that are intriguing so maybe a trade or two is needed. Only locks for next season for me are Phaneuf and Rielly. I like what Gleason brings as well.
 

Patty Lee

I hate the Habs
Nov 26, 2003
10,798
0
Visit site
I wouldn't neccessarily call it an influx. Remember, it's not like the Leafs have very good prospects "chomping at the bit" or anything. They've basically got a bunch of likely career journeymen, who are useful bodies on a 4th line, but really nothing more than that. The 2 exceptions are likely Holland & Gauthier, but the latter's still a couple of years away.

While the 4th line doesn't have to be filled with high-priced talent, it is important that the 4th line have players on it who are capable of taking on bigger roles. Right now, the only player we have who can do that is Holland, so we could be putting ourselves at a fairly substantial injury risk if we slot him into the top 9 during the offseason.

Based on what we saw today, it doesn't seem like Reimer's going to have a ton of value on the trade market in the summer... so it may just not be worth trading him, although #1 priority has to be finding for a defenceman to play with one of Franson/Gardiner (likely Gardiner because he'll be cheaper, and only an idiot would break up Phaneuf-Gunnarssson).
I must be an idiot
 

Patty Lee

I hate the Habs
Nov 26, 2003
10,798
0
Visit site
Look at some of the best teams right now; LA's got guys like Tyler Toffoli and Tanner Pearson, Chicago did it with Bollig and Shaw, Detroit's been doing it for years now, Tatar and Jurco for example this year.

There's nothing stopping us from slotting in a few of Holland, D'amigo, Ashton, Leivo and Broll in our bottom 6 next year, as long as we've got veterans mixed in.

Agree completely about the dman, we need a #2. Franson should be the one traded, either in a package for a #2dman or for a similar aged cheap bottom 6 fwd to fill the hole left by the depature of Raymond, Bolland etc.

The Leafs have a Tatar or Jurco?
 

Patty Lee

I hate the Habs
Nov 26, 2003
10,798
0
Visit site
Why does anyone think Stamkos, or Tavares, will ever be Leafs?

Both had opportunities to come home and chose to re-sign in Florida and N.Y.! :rant:

Also, does anyone really believe the NHL will allow a premium player to come to the Leafs? They will both end up back in the U.S.A. when their current contracts expire. The U.S. market is very important to Bettman and Co., and I can't see him allowing any TOP players wind up in Toronto. Well, not unless Toronto trades a boatload of talent and picks for said players! :naughty:

I really HOPE I'm WRONG!!! :nod:
I assume your 3rd paragraph is just a joke?
 

topched

Registered User
Nov 19, 2008
7,851
115
Toronto, Ontario
The Leafs have a Tatar or Jurco?

Take a look at Ashton and Hollands numbers in the A, compare to Tatar.

It's really just a matter of entrusting them with minutes and supplementing them with steady reliable veterans.

Those 3 are all similar, so was Nyquist. Difference is Babcock doesn't put Tatar on the 4th line with Colton Orr and play him 5 mins a night.

There's nothing stopping us from putting these guys in the lineup, giving them solid mins and letting them develop. We're not getting offense from those lines as it is anyway
 

Patty Lee

I hate the Habs
Nov 26, 2003
10,798
0
Visit site
Take a look at Ashton and Hollands numbers in the A, compare to Tatar.

It's really just a matter of entrusting them with minutes and supplementing them with steady reliable veterans.

Those 3 are all similar, so was Nyquist. Difference is Babcock doesn't put Tatar on the 4th line with Colton Orr and play him 5 mins a night.

There's nothing stopping us from putting these guys in the lineup, giving them solid mins and letting them develop. We're not getting offense from those lines as it is anyway
sorry, I watched Tomas here in SJ for 3 years and the Leafs do not have anyone close to him in the system that I see.

Holland is already playing in more than 1/2 the games, so not sure why you are talking about him being added next year.
 

topched

Registered User
Nov 19, 2008
7,851
115
Toronto, Ontario
sorry, I watched Tomas here in SJ for 3 years and the Leafs do not have anyone close to him in the system that I see.

Holland is already playing in more than 1/2 the games, so not sure why you are talking about him being added next year.

So after I write about comparisons to Tomas Tatar you refer back to Jurco?

My point is we've got young, controllable, cheap bottom six forwards who we need to use effectively. In the cap world these guys are very important.

In order to add some of the more important impact pieces cap wise, we need to find a way to infuse the lineup with some of Ashton, Holland, Damigo etc.

Having 3 or 4 2mil+ players in the bottom 6 is unrealistic if we want to add a #2 D etc.
 

Patty Lee

I hate the Habs
Nov 26, 2003
10,798
0
Visit site
So after I write about comparisons to Tomas Tatar you refer back to Jurco?

My point is we've got young, controllable, cheap bottom six forwards who we need to use effectively. In the cap world these guys are very important.

In order to add some of the more important impact pieces cap wise, we need to find a way to infuse the lineup with some of Ashton, Holland, Damigo etc.

Having 3 or 4 2mil+ players in the bottom 6 is unrealistic if we want to add a #2 D etc.
I asked if we had a Tatar or Jurco. You claim we have a Tatar (I'll take your word on that). I pointed out in my opinion we don't have close to a Jurco

my point was we don't have as talanted prospects as some you referenced
 

Rare Jewel

Patience
Jan 11, 2007
20,450
4,633
Leaf Land
Pretty sure the Flames aren't going to part with Sven Baertschi for that offer. He is one of their only young talents... so there's that.

Clarkson on the 4th line is a pure waste of money.

Justin Peters is a weird choice. I don't see that happening.

Why is Braun going to replace the guy that has been playing with Phaneuf for years?

They've got more then Baerstchi; Klimchuk, Porier, Jankowski, Johnny Gardreau as well.

Burke isn't a fan of him; I've heard him say almost as much as that, But look at the guys they've called up a head of him Max Reinhart, Markus Granlund and Corbin Knight add to that Hanowski, Byron, Bouma on top of that.

On Clarkson: The lines aren't concrete, If plays better he moves up, Simple as.

Peters: He's played well in Carolina, Younger in terms of UFA's, Another Ontario boy. I'm spit balling with this one.

With Braun; He's a right handed defensemen that gives us options to put Phaneuf or Rielly back on the left side, But he can also defend and make a pass. I feel Gunnarsson plays out of his depth at times with Phaneuf, So putting him on the 2nd pairing eases that.
 

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,486
3,756
Milton
If we need the cap space, I see no reason why we can't buyout Clarkson.

It would save us

2014-15 $2,958,333
2015-16 $3,708,333
2016-17 $5,208,333
2017-18 $5,208,333
2018-19 $2,958,333
2019-20 $1,458,333
2020-21 -$1,791,667
2021-22 -$1,791,667
2022-23 -$1,791,667
2023-24 -$1,791,667
2024-25 -$1,791,667
2025-26 -$1,791,667

I agree Clarkson needs to go, but not this way. I've been saying for a while Clarkson + 1st for a mid round pick to Calgary. Burke was on TSN saying he would take on bad contracts for picks and Clarkson is a very bad contract so give them a 1st. Clarkson could actually be beneficial to them and would probably do better their... Leafs get rid of that horrible contract by giving up a late 1st so a Gauthier/Percy type prospect... Though im betting Nonis has an ego and would never do it.
 

Anth93

Registered User
Jul 2, 2012
3,017
0
Depends if management will feel the need to sign/resign players that we clearly don't need.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad