Cap estimates for 25-26 through 27-28

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
The optimism in the north american economy seems misguided with all that is going on now.

Revenue would have to actually decrease between now and 2027 to not be able to meet those numbers and still be near 50% linkage. If you take the projected $6.6B for this season, the cap for next year would end up around $113m under the old calculation formula. Them only going to that number after 3 years is a conservative approach.

@mouser do you know what the current player benefits number is? I thought I saw it was $300m, but can't find where I saw that.

NHL projecting $6.6B this year. Subtract $300m from that number for the player benefits

$6.3B/2 = $3.15B
$3.15B/32 = $98.4375m salary midpoint
$98.4375+15% = $113.2m salary cap
 
Last edited:
Revenue would have to actually decrease between now and 2027 to not be able to meet those numbers and still be near 50% linkage. If you take the projected $6.6B for this season, the cap for next year would end up around $113m under the old calculation formula. Them only going to that number after 3 years is a conservative approach.

@mouser do you know what the current player benefits number is? I thought I saw it was $300m, but can't find where I saw that.

NHL projecting $6.6B this year. Subtract $300m from that number for the player benefits

$6.3B/2 = $3.15B
$3.15B/32 = $98.4375m salary midpoint
$98.4375+15% = $113.2m salary cap

I’ve never seen an official number for non salary benefits. It’s also something which I believe per a former NHLPA employee increased substantially with the 2020 MOU.

If you asked me to guess a number it would be closer to $300m than $200m.

Also, there’s a minor error in your formula. The $300m is deducted from the player 50% share of HRR. Giving us:

$6.6B / 2 = $3.3B (player share)
$3.3B - $300m = $3B (deduct non salary benefits)
$3B / 32 = $93.75m midpoint
$93.75m * 115% = $107.8m cap ceiling.

However you also have to keep in mind the NHL/PA implemented the lag formula to use HRR from two seasons prior instead of the season prior because the original formula was resulting in 10% or even higher final escrow clawbacks. Which means if the goal of the NHL/PA is to minimize escrow then the salary cap should be about 10% lower than what the formula using the season prior HRR would calculate.

Using the $6.6B HRR example that would result in a cap ceiling next season of:
$107.8m * 90% = $97m cap ceiling

Not too far off the $95.5m 2025-26 cap the NHL/PA have agreed to.
 
Revenue would have to actually decrease between now and 2027 to not be able to meet those numbers and still be near 50% linkage. If you take the projected $6.6B for this season, the cap for next year would end up around $113m under the old calculation formula. Them only going to that number after 3 years is a conservative approach.

@mouser do you know what the current player benefits number is? I thought I saw it was $300m, but can't find where I saw that.

NHL projecting $6.6B this year. Subtract $300m from that number for the player benefits

$6.3B/2 = $3.15B
$3.15B/32 = $98.4375m salary midpoint
$98.4375+15% = $113.2m salary cap
300 million probably a good guess, maybe slightly higher. Also remember now there is the 2 year lag formula in doing cap calculation.
 

Some discussion on how taxes impact player salaries.
Poorly written article, Author acknowledges teams pay a different tax on the 41 road games, then goes on to show tax calculations like it’s 82 games at home lol.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad