Friedman: Canucks will offer big money but short term to mystery ufa (possibly Carlson)

DownGoesMcDavid

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
5,281
4,064
According to Sportsnet 650 and Elliot Freidman, the Canucks will dangle a different approach this summer when it comes to free agency.

Apparently they are prepared to overpay a UFA player as long as the term is short. 3 yrs or under.

Speculation is that the mystery player is John Carlson and the offer would be 10mil/yr for 3 yrs.

This would allow Carlsson to still be a UFA at a prime age of 31 in 3 yrs.

The Canucks of course have 14 mil coming off the books w. The Sedins retiring.

The Canucks have gone on record saying they are going to be looking at UFAs that can help with the development of the young prospects that are about to take over the team.

The blue line is theyre biggest hole so its no surprise they would be targetting Carlsson.

April 4: What made last nights game so memorable? - Sportsnet.ca

1:43:05 is when the convo begins
 
Last edited:

justafan22

Registered User
Jun 22, 2014
11,629
6,249
In this case, why wouldn't a team just offer tavares league max for 3 years then?
 

Brock Radunske

안양종합운동장 빙상장
Aug 8, 2012
16,787
4,701
According to Sportsnet 650 and Elliot Freidman, the Canucks will dangle a different approach this summer when it comes to free agency.

Apparently they are prepared to overpay a UFA player as long as the term is short. 3 yrs or under.

Speculation is that the mystery player is John Carlsson and the offer would be 10mil/yr for 3 yrs.

This would allow Carlsson to still be a UFA at a prime age of 31 in 3 yrs.

The Canucks of course have 14 mil coming off the books w. The Sedins retiring.

The Canucks have gone on record saying they are going to be looking at UFAs that can help with the development of the young prospects that are about to take over the team.

The blue line is theyre biggest hole so its no surprise they would be targetting Carlsson.

Honestly, that makes a lot of sense to me.

Sign him with the loads of cap-space the Nucks have, give the fans a little star power and your prospects a mentor.
The best part is, they can deal him at the deadline in 3 years and get a return similar to NYRs when they dealt McD.

It's a high risk, high reward play for Carlson though.

OT: Keep an eye out on this because it could turn into tampering.
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,782
47,121
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
If they front-load it, they could get a huge return at a future TDL (especially with retention).

Example:
Yr1-13m
Yr2-10m
Yr3-07m

Trade him Yr2 TDL with 50% retained. Acquiring team gets him for 5m cap-hit and very small amount of actual dollars. Under those circumstances, Carlson should be worth what McDonagh got.
 

DarkHorse2

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
3,600
2,037
In this case, why wouldn't a team just offer tavares league max for 3 years then?

Because he could make more on a 7 or 8 year deal. A max contract this year at 3 year is 45 million.
If Tavares took just 7 million for 7 years, that's $49 million, guaranteed.
bump it up to $10 million, and that's $70 million. A short max contract is dumb if a longer contract is available. Ask Thomas Vanek if he regrets turning down $49 million from the Islanders.
 

Peter Griffin

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
34,911
7,249
Visit site
Why would Tavares take a big money short term deal when he will be getting big money long-term offers?

I was being facetious. There's no way Tavares is signing in Vancouver. Someone like Carlsson could make sense if he's offerred a 2 year, $20M contract compared to a 7 year, $56M contract. He could conceivably cash in for this season and next and then sign a similar, or better contract in two years when he's 30. A bit risky on both sides though.

But the fact is, the Canucks' blueline is completely pathetic and they aren't going to be helping their young forwards in Boeser, Petterson, Gaudette, Dahlen etc if their defense can't effectively move the puck to them.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,501
17,046
It's a really smart move in a time when everyone obsessively focuses just on the individual AAV. Where it really pays off is in 3 years. You got Carlson in the door, and his next deal could be more reasonable. If you time it right, all your great young players will get their raises just as Carlson's monster contract expires.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,452
20,336
MinneSNOWta
Because he could make more on a 7 or 8 year deal. A max contract this year at 3 year is 45 million.
If Tavares took just 7 million for 7 years, that's $49 million, guaranteed.
bump it up to $10 million, and that's $70 million. A short max contract is dumb if a longer contract is available. Ask Thomas Vanek if he regrets turning down $49 million from the Islanders.

3 years x $15 million plus an additional LT contract signed at age 30 with 3 years of cap increases might be a lot more $'s than signing a LT contract now and a 3 year deal after that.

Of course, there's always the injury risk or the 'game going to shit' risk that would come along with it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad