Shareefruck
Registered User
There's also a third, and in my opinion, more pertinent discussion-- how the acquisition affects the team when the unrealistic stated goal inevitably collapses.It doesn't but I think you have to assess the signing based on the stated goals of the organization which is make the playoffs and re-build on the fly. You have the discussion of whether that is the correct goal to have (it isn't IMO) and you a second discussion on whether or not the acquisition helps meet the stated goal. In this case it likely does. He can put up some points. No youth or picks walked out the door to make it happen. For many of the other moves Benning has made the asset bleed means he is not fulfilling at least half of the stated goal (re-build on the fly) and even the first part (giving up superior players for lesser ones). But I don't think that is the case on this one.
It will be an albatross contract a few years down the road though.