Coaches Coroner
Member
- Mar 12, 2009
- 7,498
- 7,729
Ya lol he is much better
"Much" is an overstatement, having seen him more times than I can keep track of this past season and having seen Sergachyov around 8 times in the OHL this year. Currently, you could argue Sergachyov is better (won best D in the OHL this season, over Juolevi). I think Juolevi is smarter but they're similar offensively. Juolevi is has better defensive positioning and awareness, but Sergachyov is no slouch, is stronger and more physical. They are fairly close.
I like this.
Olli haters can go sit in a dark corner somewhere, us belivers will gladly see how he develops and becomes a steady and important presence on the Vancouver blueline for years and years to come.
Should be going back to juniors this season tho. Which is totally the best thing for him right now.
It's hilarious how much Canuck players are underrated on here.
The haters are jealous. Olli is gonna be a star #1 D.
If juolevi was drafted by Chicago, they would agree.
It's okay. Haters be hating. We love it Keep being salty.
What "hate" are you talking about? London fans and people who saw him in London all year seem to think he's more of a #2/3, which is still a very good NHL defender. Are we really getting so dramatic that we are calling those assessments "hate"? . It's hilarious how several people are talking about haters, and minus one obvious troll calling him a bust, the worst thing anyone is said about him is that he might only have #2/3 potential. I guess on HF if people don't share your most-optimistic view of a player, they are "haters". When you stop bringing valid information to support your view and result to labeling or name calling to dismiss the other sides opinion, you're argument probably isn't as strong as you think.
He's going to be a very good player, no need to overreact.