Confirmed with Link: Canucks Sign G Kevin Lankinen to 1y/0.875m Contract

iceburg

Don't ask why
Aug 31, 2003
7,810
4,211
They'd be lucky to get him for $3Mx3. I'd do that in a heartbeat.

If another team decides they think he can be their starter then $4M-$5M with term would not be shocking.

The only thing benefitting the team right now in negotiations is that he lost big last summer by holding out for a better deal. He might be a little nervous that that might happen again. If he likes Vancouver he may decide to sign sooner rather than later.
 

SillyRabbit

Trix Are For Kids
Jan 3, 2006
9,301
9,519
I think the only way Lankinen re-signs is if the Canucks end up trading Demko.

Would you guys roll the dice and try to get a good return for Demko and try to re-up Lankinen?

Demko is obviously better when healthy, but his long term health is a concern.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,709
6,482
I think the only way Lankinen re-signs is if the Canucks end up trading Demko.

Would you guys roll the dice and try to get a good return for Demko and try to re-up Lankinen?

Demko is obviously better when healthy, but his long term health is a concern.

I think Lankinen will take the money if offered. The issue is that I can’t see the Canucks won’t offering him term and $3-4M AAV to be a backup.

Personally, I roll the dice on Demko being healthy and elite. His health issues might actually make it possible to extend him to a lower AAV. Given the recent goalie contracts that have been given out, Demko was pretty much guaranteed a long term contract at $8M+ AAV. That still might be the case but it will be on the lower end.
 

Jyrki21

2021-12-05
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2004
11,049
10,084
Ottawa, FCR
benningonempty.tumblr.com
I think the only way Lankinen re-signs is if the Canucks end up trading Demko.

Would you guys roll the dice and try to get a good return for Demko and try to re-up Lankinen?

Demko is obviously better when healthy, but his long term health is a concern.
I can’t imagine Demko would net a huge return, just because few goalies do and he will always have health concerns.
 

Zippgunn

Registered User
May 15, 2011
4,121
1,789
Lhuntshi
Lanky has easily been our MVP this year and I would move heaven and earth to keep him here after this deal is done. The idea of signing Demko to any sort of long term deal gives me the horrors and if it means losing Lankinen I would move on from Demko; he isn't ever going to be better than he was before and he could suddenly be unable to play at all. Find him a comfortable retirement home in Cali...
 

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
39,176
8,237
Montreal, Quebec
I think the only way Lankinen re-signs is if the Canucks end up trading Demko.

Would you guys roll the dice and try to get a good return for Demko and try to re-up Lankinen?

Demko is obviously better when healthy, but his long term health is a concern.

With Demko's injury history, he wouldn't fetch a worthwhile return. A late 1st is probably the best we could hope for, and that's not very appealing to a win now team. I also worry Lankinen wouldn't be this good as a full time starter given he's never been one before now.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad