ah ok cool. Good talk
have the canucks conceded a goal at EV with him on the ice ?
That was also when Myers went for a skate and allowed a clear 2 on 1 against with Hirose as the man backAccording to Natural Stat Trick they have not. In his 87:46 minutes of even strength ice-time, no goals have been scored against. The only goal was shorthanded. Through 103:13 of icetime, that lone goal is the only goal scored while he's on the ice.
Hughes is excellent defensively but all that defense comes from stick checks and agility, none from one on one physical battles. I see Hirose in the same mold.
There really isn't one player in that group that can be considered a highly physical player. Hronek's the closest to playing with that edge. Ideally they would have one on every pairing.
Fair enough. Sample size is small at the NHL level. We'll see what he can do. I'm not sure how much strength he can gain at 24 and a relatively small frame. He's listed at 6'0" and 170lbs. The eye test says he may be able to top out at 180lbs but not much more. He'll need to use his stick and body position well to defend well because he isn't going to be pushing a lot of forwards off the puck.as someone who watched hirose a fair bit in college he doesn't play like hughes in his own end at all. in fact, his development to a top pairing defender in college coincided with him developing a physical edge to his game and learning to use his body to disrupt opposing players. he'll have to develop the strength to do that in the nhl if he's going to succeed as a pro. you can see this in the games he's played so far. he looks excellent with the puck on his stick and he makes excellent decisions for the most part but he's been largely ineffective off the puck because he's easily removed from the play or just shrugged off by opposing players. his stick work isn't anywhere near good enough to be a strong defender unless he can also use his body
as for hronek i have no idea why people think he plays with an edge. he's one of the softest players in the league. the #1 criticism of him is his failure to engage without the puck and his tendency to get bullied out of the play
(i think hirose and hronek are both good players. they just both have pretty obvious deficiencies when it comes to defending in the zone)
I don’t watch the Wings but their fans seem to think Hronek plays fairly physicalas someone who watched hirose a fair bit in college he doesn't play like hughes in his own end at all. in fact, his development to a top pairing defender in college coincided with him developing a physical edge to his game and learning to use his body to disrupt opposing players. he'll have to develop the strength to do that in the nhl if he's going to succeed as a pro. you can see this in the games he's played so far. he looks excellent with the puck on his stick and he makes excellent decisions for the most part but he's been largely ineffective off the puck because he's easily removed from the play or just shrugged off by opposing players. his stick work isn't anywhere near good enough to be a strong defender unless he can also use his body
as for hronek i have no idea why people think he plays with an edge. he's one of the softest players in the league. the #1 criticism of him is his failure to engage without the puck and his tendency to get bullied out of the play
(i think hirose and hronek are both good players. they just both have pretty obvious deficiencies when it comes to defending in the zone)
I don’t watch the Wings but their fans seem to think Hronek plays fairly physical
All this talk about Hirose lacking size is so ridiculous. This player is another 'found money' by management. Seriously Alvin should be gaining confidence from a lot of fans at the moment. But that won't be the case for some I realize as the focus will be on our overall record and simplistic arguments about being meddling in mediocrity as we finish the season sabotaging our own draft position.
Hirose makes Rathbone a little bit of a redundant asset. Don't think Rathbone has much trade value but wouldn't be surprised if we try to grab a draft pick and roster space for him this off-season.
as for hronek i have no idea why people think he plays with an edge. he's one of the softest players in the league. the #1 criticism of him is his failure to engage without the puck and his tendency to get bullied out of the play
You lose a ton of credibility when you make statements like this.
The pro scouting has been ridiculously good but nobody in the media or fanbase wants to give credit where it's due.
In one year of work on the pro scouting side:
Mikheyev, Aman, Joshua, Wolanin, Hirose, McWard, Sasson, Johansson, Kuzmenko, Dries, PDG (was already in the system but they gave him a chance), Bear, Mikheyev
Building great depth at low cost and adding free legitimate prospects... also hitting a grand salami with Kuzmenko.
Compare that to Benning's track record... it's really night and day.
Hirose looks too good to be true - he'd be a great 3LD to start next year. If Kuzmenko is a grand slam, Hirose might be a triple/double. Hirose plays a very smart and smooth game... a modern NHL defeseneman. He doesn't have the size but he doesn't need it. Great find by the Canucks. Many wanted Livingstone/Malinski but Hirose looks to be a gamer.
i watched hronek in the nhl for four years. i lived across the street from little ceasar's arena for 2.5 of those. can players change and could hronek have changed? sure. am i confident hronek has been a soft as shit player most of his career? yes
Over exaggerated nonsense. He plays a limited physical game but I would actually say he's above average physically. 'One of the softest players in the league'...it's disingenuous, especially considering how much you've watched him
Does he go to Abby after this mess ? He be a good addition to them.
Yeah and you said he plays like Myers and now you are saying he’s soft.i watched hronek in the nhl for four years. i lived across the street from little ceasar's arena for 2.5 of those. can players change and could hronek have changed? sure. am i confident hronek has been a soft as shit player most of his career? yes
We should make him our goaltender.According to Natural Stat Trick they have not. In his 87:46 minutes of even strength ice-time, no goals have been scored against. The only goal was shorthanded. Through 103:13 of icetime, that lone goal is the only goal scored while he's on the ice.
Not that Im disagreeing with you but thats a really low bar.In a lot of cases, all it cost them were contract slots or late round draft picks. Obviously not all these guys will work out, but clearly this management group is operating at a different level than their predecessors.
Are there a lot of teams out there signing players of similar quality? I don't follow the league closely enough to have a solid idea but my impression is that the Canucks getting Sasson, Hirose and McWard is above average and well above "basic competency". Signing Kuzmenko was obviously a home run.Not that Im disagreeing with you but thats a really low bar.
But yeah at the very least there are signs of competency, even if they made moves that I personally didnt like.