Quinning
Registered User
- Mar 18, 2008
- 27,954
- 16,557
If the price is right, it's worth flipping him. They can't replace him directly but Raty could potentially fill that role.
Judging by Friedman and Dhaliwal both chiming in, I’m going to guess he’s good as gone. I could see us easily retaining 50% and getting a 2nd+ for Suter.I’m guessing based on wording that this means the Canucks may trade him?
I’m guessing based on wording that this means the Canucks may trade him?
I would be happy with that result but perhaps saving that retention slot for Boeser would be wiser?Judging by Friedman and Dhaliwal both chiming in, I’m going to guess he’s good as gone. I could see us easily retaining 50% and getting a 2nd+ for Suter.
yeah you’re probably right, Suter’s cap is already so low and a third party could easily broker any of these deals as well.I would be happy with that result but perhaps saving that retention slot for Boeser would be wiser?
650CKOMWhat's your flavor?
95.1 or 102.1 - my guess
98.3 - my station ... I'm getting old haha
90.5 - my backup ... at least it's different all the time ... really diverse stuff
92.9 - I am coming around on country but never on purpose![]()
Suter is a guy you keep if the money is reasonable (~3Mish), but with the cap going up and him coming here under cap squeeze circumstances, I don't blame him for chasing a higher pay day. And I think he'll get it in the offseason.
I'll always remember game 6 :')
I re-watch the series mini-move that the NHL did frequently. The slow motion on his goal is sublime.
Usually I'd agree with this.. but they have already done that with Joshua, Blueger, Connor. On top of they have sherwood, garland for another year each. they can't keep signing bottom six guys to term.Suter is a guy you keep if the money is reasonable (~3Mish), but with the cap going up and him coming here under cap squeeze circumstances, I don't blame him for chasing a higher pay day. And I think he'll get it in the offseason.
I'll always remember game 6 :')
Highly unlikely, certainly in the short-term. Suter has become a legitimate elite defensive center, while chipping in ~15 goals like clockwork.If the price is right, it's worth flipping him. They can't replace him directly but Raty could potentially fill that role.
Yeah, if Aqua wants to make the playoffs, trading Suter doesn't help. He's been chronically underrated his whole career.He's a seriously underrated player, and I will miss him if this is it for him in Vancouver. Sucks they weren't able to find a compromise on a modest extension, but with him hitting a career high in goals the writing has been on the wall for him to cash in in free agency.
They must be close on a trade for another center if they're comfortable trading their 3c while still trying to make the playoffs.
With the Evans extension, I was kinda hoping they could find a reasonable deal to extend Suter. He's a guy who the league is still going to undervalue relative to his actual on-ice contributions.Suter is a guy you keep if the money is reasonable (~3Mish), but with the cap going up and him coming here under cap squeeze circumstances, I don't blame him for chasing a higher pay day. And I think he'll get it in the offseason.
I'll always remember game 6 :')
The Evans deal, absolutely. Would be a slam dunk to get Suter around that number.I’d sign Suter to that deal. He’s an extremely useful player for this team, and not as easily replaced as some might think, IMO.