rypper
21-12-05 it's finally over.
- Dec 22, 2006
- 17,999
- 23,730
I don’t really get why they wouldn’t be willing to move Ritchie in a situation like this. Stanley Cup vs prospect cup.The one that perplexes me is Colorado. You make that Rantanen trade because you don't like the contract rumours and you want to get deeper.
Miller trade would have let them get off the guy they want to get off the most in Mittlestadt while buying low on elite talent who would absolutely fit in with Mackinnon's vibe.
There was a window for them to do it before NYR came back to the table yesterday.
Just a mindblowing miss for them imo.
ah, that makes senseThey don’t have a 1st and we want a 1st so we can flip it
The one that perplexes me is Colorado. You make that Rantanen trade because you don't like the contract rumours and you want to get deeper.
Miller trade would have let them get off the guy they want to get off the most in Mittlestadt while buying low on elite talent who would absolutely fit in with Mackinnon's vibe.
There was a window for them to do it before NYR came back to the table yesterday.
Just a mindblowing miss for them imo.
Man, Tuch has never played center. I'd be happy to get rid of Cozens, but maybe some GM likes him and we could get an RD for him somewhere, and we don't need any more wingers right now. Our idiot GM said he's going to re-sign Zucker and Greenway (not sure if he can do it though). We still need a 1C or at least a top 6 C. Someone like Power could be a trade chip for that.Just trade Hoglander+ for Cozens and call it a day. Buffalo gets more sandpaper and Tuch can move back to center. With Kulich stepping up beside Thompson and Peterka, Tuch back as the 2nd line center, and McLeod doing really well as their 3rd line center, Cozens is redundant on that team, especially for his cap. He hasn't lived up to his contract (and has been very unlucky this season so....)
Especially yoursMy B on the ignore post @Vector. I'd edit but the thread is dead so I can't.
For comedy sake, you should make a giant red "CENSORED BY VECTOR" stamp you can slap over posts that mess with the vibe around here, mine included.
oh i got the reference. it's just nobody my age watched that show.For you whippersnappers that can't tie your shoelaces because of velcro, and wouldn't be able to dial a rotary phone if your life depended on it - and have no idea what a shared land line is - you can start edumacating your selfs here:
30 Years Later, ‘Dallas’s’ Shower Scene Still Makes a Splash
In so many ways, “Dallas” is the show that invented modern television. It’s not just that J.R. Ewing gave rise to Tony Soprano, Frank Underwood and the myriad antiheroes who now dominate dramatic T…dallasdecoder.com
Am I losing my mind? I swear he was playing center for a while. Need to go give my head a shake lmfao - must be mixing him up with someone else. Is Thompson done playing center? Kulich looks to be the center of choice right now.Man, Tuch has never played center. I'd be happy to get rid of Cozens, but maybe some GM likes him and we could get an RD for him somewhere, and we don't need any more wingers right now. Our idiot GM said he's going to re-sign Zucker and Greenway (not sure if he can do it though). We still need a 1C or at least a top 6 C. Someone like Power could be a trade chip for that.
Thompson has almost always played center, not Tuch, but he is now playing on the wing and he is not a typical center at all. Basically, both Thompson and Kulich are players who like to shoot and they always have more goals than assists, and we really lack a top 6 C playmaker for our wingers. I would prefer to keep one of Thompson/Kulich on the wing and get a top 6 C playmaker somewhere else.Am I losing my mind? I swear he was playing center for a while. Need to go give my head a shake lmfao - must be mixing him up with someone else. Is Thompson done playing center? Kulich looks to be the center of choice right now.
Must've mixed Tuch and Thompson when I was catching a few games. My bad.Thompson has almost always played center, not Tuch, but he is now playing on the wing and he is not a typical center at all. Basically, both Thompson and Kulich are players who like to shoot and they always have more goals than assists, and we really lack a top 6 C playmaker for our wingers. I would prefer to keep one of Thompson/Kulich on the wing and get a top 6 C playmaker somewhere else.
So far the line Peterka - Kulich - Thompson works great and I think there is no point in destroying it at this stage.
posted on the main but here you go
What asset fits this description that’s actually available with the assets Canucks have?
Canucks don’t really have a lot of trade assets. Couple of B-Tier defensive prospects, two blue chippers that I really can’t see them trading, Hoglander, and some draft picks. Biggest asset might their ability to take on a bad contract in order.
Like say a Josh Norris or Dylan Cozens but at minimal cost because you can take on the full salary. Lawson Crouse would be a fun buy-low candidate.
It would have to be Petey for him, otherwise not happening.Barzal would be nice.
posted on the main but here you go
Don’t know about that, you get the superstar level guy if you have the chance.I actually think Carolina missed out too. Don’t get me wrong, Carolina is better with Rantanaan, but I think they would be better with Necas AND Miller than just Rantanaan, even though he is the best player of the 3.
I guess the Av's figured that with cap going up, Rantanen wouldn't re-sign for anything less that $14m a season.The one that perplexes me is Colorado. You make that Rantanen trade because you don't like the contract rumours and you want to get deeper.
Miller trade would have let them get off the guy they want to get off the most in Mittlestadt while buying low on elite talent who would absolutely fit in with Mackinnon's vibe.
There was a window for them to do it before NYR came back to the table yesterday.
Just a mindblowing miss for them imo.
this is usually a draft day type deal? And the player usually comes with question marks (think PLD)
Another player with an injury history. Maybe if we collect them all, they become stronger together.Josh Norris' name is out there, but I don't think there's any chance if we're looking at a deal before season's end. Ottawa is near the top of the heap of the playoff pileup in the East and is more likely to be a buyer than seller.