VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 26,764
- 13,564
A replacement for BearLet’s say the Canucks sign Bear.
What acquisition would be next on your wishlist before the trade deadline?
A replacement for BearLet’s say the Canucks sign Bear.
What acquisition would be next on your wishlist before the trade deadline?
Let’s say the Canucks sign Bear.
What acquisition would be next on your wishlist before the trade deadline?
I like the idea of BuchnevichA two-way winger with speed and size.
I mentioned it earlier, but once Bear signs and is up to speed I would love to try and swap out Myers' cap hit for Anthony Mantha.
Mantha-Pettersson-Mikheyev can be the top line Tocchet uses for matchups, with Kuzmenko-Miller-Boeser putting up points in the softer minutes.
Other, lesser targets: Nino Niederreiter, Kasperi Kapanen, DIllon Dube (who's an RFA but unlikely to be qualified).
I would love to do Garland out, and a true third line banger in next. With cap savings (although we probably need to take back a cap dump for atleast this season)Let’s say the Canucks sign Bear.
What acquisition would be next on your wishlist before the trade deadline?
I like the idea of Buchnevich
Great fit but he'll cost a lot - not sure this is the year to unload firsts at the trade deadline, even with that extra year.
I think you could get a lot more than Buchnevich for a first and Brz, who is almost worth a first himself.Yeah. As I agreed with on the main board he's more of a want than a need and the assets probably should be used to upgrade the defence further. But man...few players I'd like in the top 6 more. If they could send Garland the other way it's two birds with one stone. One St Louis fan suggested a 1st and Brz which I'd definitely do. Sign Tanev in the offseason for 2 years and it's a good looking squad on paper at least.
I think you could get a lot more than Buchnevich for a first and Brz, who is almost worth a first himself.
If the Penguins continue to fall out of contention, I'd take a hard look at Reilly Smith. A possession monster who'd look great on either Miller or Pettersson's wing.
If the blues are out at TDL and are sellers, I am sure 1st and a B prospect would do it. I guess the better question is, if we spend 1st + prospect, shouldn’t we get a center.Great fit but he'll cost a lot - not sure this is the year to unload firsts at the trade deadline, even with that extra year.
If the blues are out at TDL and are sellers, I am sure 1st and a B prospect would do it. I guess the better question is, if we spend 1st + prospect, shouldn’t we get a center.
I wonder what the cost would be to get Tanev now from Flames instead of signing Bear. We could put Tanev back with Hughes or leave Hronek and Hughes together and have a shutdown pair with Zadorov and Tanev together.I think it’s unlikely for us to resign Cole.
Hughes-Tanev
Zadarov - Hronek
Soucy - Bear
Seems like a more balance lineup. Good puck mover and defensive D guy on each pair.
Were not that good at killing penalties as is that pyscho would do much more harm than good here. Not to mention the term on his deal.The answer is easy and would change the whole outlook of the team along with the Zadorov acquisition…. Tom Wilson should be the target! Washington is free falling and Tom Wilson on the 1st or 2nd line would be absolutely amazing for creating space and making us one of the most physical teams in the West.
Looks like we have Demkos possible replacement (s?) in the AHL. Boeser is a good player but not irreplaceable.I've been thinking - and I know this is a longer term concern - how are are we possibly going to keep all of Miller, Pettersson, Boeser, Hughes, Hronek and Demko together long term?
Demko and Hughes are locked in for another 2 and 3 seasons after this one respectively, and Hughes's contract likely represents this team's window, but Pettersson and Hronek need an extension this summer and Boeser has 1 year left. Miller of course is signed long term to a very good contract, thankfully.
It's a good problem to have but we have a core of players performing at very high levels. It's hard to keep that together. The Canucks are going to have to make sure their drafting and development is immaculate because they're going to need to fill out the roster with cheap internal options.
It'll be interesting to see how Silovs shows in the NHL. If he's the real deal then maybe letting Demko walk is an option to save cap, though we've seen how important Vasilevskiy is to a team like the Tampa Bay Lightning who also have a high end, expensive core and had every reason to take that option of not paying their goalie, but they didn't.
This would be fantastic but I don’t see management giving up the pieces in order to get him. Without giving up our first or a top Prospect and looking for a player with speed and skill on a struggling team I could honestly see us going after Duclair in San Jose.Boone Jenner is the answer. Can play LW in the top6 or 3C. Is a tank and doesn't take stupid penalties or have a horrendous contract. Of course that means Myers is punted to whoever wants some D depth that looks big
Call up Podkolzin and Bains to help the wings when appropriate. Sign Bear and were pretty loaded and ready to do some damage
buchnevich is a good player but he'll be monstrously expensive to acquire and then you need to reup him the same year the oel cap hit happens. i'd rather the canucks go after nylander, reinhart, teravainen or similar in the offseason
Nylander is going to want, and will get, $10m+. How will we fit him in?If Nylander hits UFA, which I doubt will happen, yes I'm in favor of the Canucks making the godfather offer there.
Reinhart and Teravainen ... eh, I think both guys are at a danger age and will probably get very poor contracts.
If we're winger shopping on July 1st I'm shopping in the bargain basement: Anthony Mantha, David Perron, Kasperi Kapanen, Vladimir Tarasenko. I'd also keep an eye on qualifying offers to Dillon Dube, Luke Kunin, Owen Tippet, Alexander Texier, Michael Rasmussen, Isac Lundestrom, and Kaapo Kakko.
I’d pass on Nylander. A really good player but I’m leery of signing guys who have break out seasons in their contract years. Think he will get massively overpaid by someone.Nylander is going to want, and will get, $10m+. How will we fit him in?
The only way for that to happen is if Petey doesn't extend here. I guess if you are sold that this 2023-24 version of Nylander is the one you will get going forward, trading Petey for a huge haul and signing Nylander might not be a bad idea... But if Petey is willing to stay, I rather just extend him. Nylander has been a pretty good playoff performer in his career, which is a plus.
Nylander's been good for the leafs every year but the one where he had the contract dispute and missed half the seasonI’d pass on Nylander. A really good player but I’m leery of signing guys who have break out seasons in their contract years. Think he will get massively overpaid by someone.