Rumor: - Canucks going after Rossi? | Page 12 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: Canucks going after Rossi?

Do we though? So you’d rather do Rossi for someone like Hayton than Rossi for #15+Lekkerimäki?

We can always flip the pick in a package for a player.
Yeah! I am just tired of getting wings all the time. Rather try to get Barrett H with a high pick than a prospect and mid 1st in a bad draft. Honestly I just for once don’t want to trade a C for a winger
 
Yeah! I am just tired of getting wings all the time. Rather try to get Barrett H with a high pick than a prospect and mid 1st in a bad draft. Honestly I just for once don’t want to trade a C for a winger
That’s setting yourself up to not get good value. Honestly, what team is looking to do a center for center swap?

Sign Duchene or Tavares and then trade Rossi for 2026 1st (protected) + Lekkerimäki.
 
That’s setting yourself up to not get good value. Honestly, what team is looking to do a center for center swap?

Sign Duchene or Tavares and then trade Rossi for 2026 1st (protected) + Lekkerimäki.
If we get 2026 pick, I agree with you. What are the odd Tavares or Matt are signing with MN?
 
I'd prefer not giving up Lekkerimäki. We're weak enough as is on prospect depth. He's one of the few wingers we have with possible top six upside.

If that means giving up our 2026 1st unprotected then I'm down to gamble. Maybe toss is San Jose's 3rd this year and basically make it the offer sheet compensation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baby Pettersson
W

With Brock Nelson off the market now, mn has to get back a C instead of a winger prospect. Respectfully, I am tired of bringing prospects or players because they have a former teammate on wild. I get where youre coming from, but unless a top 5 prospect falls or top 7, wild should look elsewhere.
Are we not allowed to make other trades after we (hypothetically) trade Rossi for a pick and a prospect? We don’t ‘need’ a C back in a Rossi trade.
 
Are we not allowed to make other trades after we (hypothetically) trade Rossi for a pick and a prospect? We don’t ‘need’ a C back in a Rossi trade.
We don’t need anything back in a Rossi trade honestly. We could just give him away. The absolute mind numbing pos that drew up the lineup during the most important games decided has has basically zero value so f*** it. Just let him go to some other team
 
Why isn’t anyone interested in him ? And also if he was that good why don’t Minnesota wild just keep him. It’s a absolutely how stupid the Canucks looking acting this desperate.
 
Are we not allowed to make other trades after we (hypothetically) trade Rossi for a pick and a prospect? We don’t ‘need’ a C back in a Rossi trade.
I mean but sure that those trades can be made, or if they trade for a certain package, they can turn around and trade that package. Like be sure a deal is already pre-arranged or darn close to do so
 
Why isn’t anyone interested in him ? And also if he was that good why don’t Minnesota wild just keep him. It’s a absolutely how stupid the Canucks looking acting this desperate.
Easy, Turbo. It's just a rumor, and all they've supposedly done is inquire about Rossi. For all we know, they could've not liked the price and moved on, or offered some lowball deal.
 
Lebrun says Pettersson will stay past July 1st. Nucks lose all leverage with Elias having full no trade clause. I don't think nucks will now trade for Rossi.
 
Don't think the Canucks are doing Lekkerimaki + 1st for Rossi. It would be the 1st & a lesser prospect like Mynio or Kudrayvstev.

I like Rossi & want the Canucks to go after him. But all the teams have the same issue with him that Minnesota does. It's why teams don't seem to be tripping over themselves to get him despite being a 23 y/o top 6 C.

And Minnesota hasn't boosted his value by admitting they want to move him & also putting him on the 4th line in the playoffs.

They'll get a good return, but I wonder how many teams are willing to pay a premium.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad