I could see it being possible in the moment, depending on how the first 8 picks shake out. Seems like more of our (Minnesota's) Plan C or D though.Would we do Rossi for 9? Is MIN going to sell him or swap him for a roster guy?
I doubt your doubt. Lekkerimaki is a good, skilled prospect, but he is by no mean physical. Can't see Guerin being enthused about getting him. If he is, i'd have to wonder why he wanted to trade Rossi in the 1st place.I doubt the Wild would say no to #15+Lekkerimäki. Word on the street is they might prefer a 2026 pick. Any interest in 2026 1st (top 10 protected) + Lekkerimäki for Rossi?
Lekkerimäki plays a position that doesn’t require as much physicality. See: Zuccarello, Johansson, Nyquist, etc.I doubt your doubt. Lekkerimaki is a good, skilled prospect, but he is by no mean physical. Can't see Guerin being enthused about getting him. If he is, i'd have to wonder why he wanted to trade Rossi in the 1st place.
Guerin's seat will be getting very warm if the team doesn't make some noise in the playoffs next season. Lekkerimaki and a 15th may eventually be a nice return, but but that won't help BG if he is fired for not getting a playoff series win in 25-26.
If the nucks are decided on a 2c over giving Chytil a shot, 15th and Lekkerimakki for Rossi, seems pretty fair.Lekkerimäki plays a position that doesn’t require as much physicality. See: Zuccarello, Johansson, Nyquist, etc.
Chytil might be better suited at wing anyway.If the nucks are decided on a 2c over giving Chytil a shot, 15th and Lekkerimakki for Rossi, seems pretty fair.
No, it really doesn't seem fair. Wild are seeking a win now player like Peterka,. with Brock Nelson being off the marker now, apparently wild have shifted to seeking a Ready now C or a C that can help them compete now. The 15th pick in this draft isn't good, and unless wild can get a deal already agreed to, it's a no.If the nucks are decided on a 2c over giving Chytil a shot, 15th and Lekkerimakki for Rossi, seems pretty fair.
I wouldn’t dismiss this offer. It follows the exact same type of deal as the Fiala trade.No, it really doesn't seem fair. Wild are seeking a win now player like Peterka,. with Brock Nelson being off the marker now, apparently wild have shifted to seeking a Ready now C or a C that can help them compete now. The 15th pick in this draft isn't good, and unless wild can get a deal already agreed to, it's a no.
Size down the middle is a lot different then size on the wingsI doubt your doubt. Lekkerimaki is a good, skilled prospect, but he is by no mean physical. Can't see Guerin being enthused about getting him. If he is, i'd have to wonder why he wanted to trade Rossi in the 1st place.
Guerin's seat will be getting very warm if the team doesn't make some noise in the playoffs next season. Lekkerimaki and a 15th may eventually be a nice return, but but that won't help BG if he is fired for not getting a playoff series win in 25-26.
I don't agree. Make sure you have at least one guy with size or above average physical play on each line. It doesn't matter what position all that much. It could be argued that you need more size on the wing because they are involved in more board battles.Size down the middle is a lot different then size on the wings
It should actually be a limit of 1 small guy per line. I flat out disagree that size is more important on the wings too. The center is the guy battling in the prime scoring areas in the defensive zone. Way more important than losing a battle along the boards.I don't agree. Make sure you have at least one guy with size or above average physical play on each line. It doesn't matter what position all that much. It could be argued that you need more size on the wing because they are involved in more board battles.
The truth about this situation is that Rossi is the best scoring C at his age that MN has ever had, and that they would be crazy to trade him unless they get a point scoring C back. The odds are that Rossi will score more than 60 pts. multiple times over the rest of his career. You don't throw that away on an offense starved team because your GM is obsessed with his tape measure. They have JEE to take the tough defensive matchups, anyway.
What you want and what you'll get are obviously two very different things here.No, it really doesn't seem fair. Wild are seeking a win now player like Peterka,. with Brock Nelson being off the marker now, apparently wild have shifted to seeking a Ready now C or a C that can help them compete now. The 15th pick in this draft isn't good, and unless wild can get a deal already agreed to, it's a no.
Same could be said for whoever the other team is.What you want and what you'll get are obviously two very different things here.
Sure, except the position of strength surely isn't the team looking to trade the player. Using the Fiala trade as a precedent is absolutely acceptable here.Same could be said for whoever the other team is.
Fiala was traded because of capspace issues, respectively you’re wrong in terms of you can’t use the fiala trade comparison for this.Sure, except the position of strength surely isn't the team looking to trade the player. Using the Fiala trade as a precedent is absolutely acceptable here.
So a blue chip prospect and a top 20 pickSure, except the position of strength surely isn't the team looking to trade the player. Using the Fiala trade as a precedent is absolutely acceptable here.
1st+Lekkerimäki is not a bad offer. We should always be looking for the best value.Fiala was traded because of capspace issues, respectively you’re wrong in terms of you can’t use the fiala trade comparison for this.
Didn't you guys draft his buddy? They had some pretty good numbers in Sweden together.1st+Lekkerimäki is not a bad offer. We should always be looking for the best value.
I'm not sure I'd term Lekkerimaki's numbers in the AHL as "great" they're ok. But certainly not great. Also, Joshua doesn't hold much value because of his contract. He got paid on the basis of an outlier year abd it remains to be seen if he can come close to replicating it.Didn't you guys draft his buddy? They had some pretty good numbers in Sweden together.
Not really to familiar with the whole situation involving Rossi but if it's true that he wants a certain amount and the wild don't see him at that value, then it's fair to say acquiring teams might also be weary if that number which limits the number of teams.
The 15th and a former 15th who has displayed great numbers as he's progressed the last two years and is very capable of becoming a legit #1 winger, is not a bad package at all.
I'd even throw in Joshua who to me seems like a "wild type of player" but with the nucks needing cap space and how are depth chart lies, is expendable IMHO.
With Brock Nelson off the market now, mn has to get back a C instead of a winger prospect. Respectfully, I am tired of bringing prospects or players because they have a former teammate on wild. I get where youre coming from, but unless a top 5 prospect falls or top 7, wild should look elsewhere.1st+Lekkerimäki is not a bad offer. We should always be looking for the best value.
Yeah, my goal is to pair Öhgren and Eriksson Ek with Lekkerimäki.Didn't you guys draft his buddy? They had some pretty good numbers in Sweden together.
Not really to familiar with the whole situation involving Rossi but if it's true that he wants a certain amount and the wild don't see him at that value, then it's fair to say acquiring teams might also be weary if that number which limits the number of teams.
The 15th and a former 15th who has displayed great numbers as he's progressed the last two years and is very capable of becoming a legit #1 winger, is not a bad package at all.
I'd even throw in Joshua who to me seems like a "wild type of player" but with the nucks needing cap space and how are depth chart lies, is expendable IMHO.
Lekkerimakki had 19 goals and 28 points in 36 games as a 19-20 year old, those are great numbers imo.I'm not sure I'd term Lekkerimaki's numbers in the AHL as "great" they're ok. But certainly not great. Also, Joshua doesn't hold much value because of his contract. He got paid on the basis of an outlier year abd it remains to be seen if he can come close to replicating it.
Do we though? So you’d rather do Rossi for someone like Hayton than Rossi for #15+Lekkerimäki?W
With Brock Nelson off the market now, mn has to get back a C instead of a winger prospect. Respectfully, I am tired of bringing prospects or players because they have a former teammate on wild. I get where youre coming from, but unless a top 5 prospect falls or top 7, wild should look elsewhere.
This draft doesn't seem like one where you'd trade for the #15 pick right now.Do we though? So you’d rather do Rossi for someone like Hayton than Rossi for #15+Lekkerimäki?
We can always flip the pick in a package for a player.