Randy Randerson
Registered User
I'd agree Tanev is a #2(albeit on the low end of a #2)
Now I don't know where your getting the rest from, cause I never offered anything. I simply said crunks ask was ridiculous, and I'll gladly hold go that.
A top 5/10 1st + 31-40 pick + Kapanen is crazy for a one dimensional #2 defenseman.
Tanev could be a very good #2, depends how you value offense and it's role in how it affects winning. Advanced stats are still in their infancy in hockey, they paint Tanev as a very good #2/maybe #1, but its hard to accept that at face value with no offense to speak of
the second half of that post was quoting another poster (russ4king), he offered Carrick/Leipsic/2nd
I agree that if our pick is a top 5 or 10, and if Kapanen is still lighting up the AHL that including both of those would be too much. I also think if our pick is that high, we're not going after Tanev - he's a finishing piece for us, and unless it looks like we need that then we just draft and develop