Post-Game Talk: Canucks 1, Blues 0 - PGT starts at post #593

Status
Not open for further replies.

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,966
92,623
Vancouver, BC
Everyone on this site has a better chance winning the lottery than the Canucks winning the cup

If you'd rather draft 3 or 4 spots higher than watch your team play playoff games than I quite frankly feel sorry for you and sorry for your take on life.

If we were the 29th placed team in the league ... whatever, for the last 10 games. But battling for a playoff spot? Any fan who wants to tank is a ****ing loser.
 

Zombotron

Supreme Overlord of Crap
Jan 3, 2010
18,390
10,005
Toronto
Lu and Booth to St. Louis for Halak and Chris Stewart.

St. Louis gets their goalie upgrade and replaces one struggling forward with another, Vancouver clears a bit of cap space and gets an inconsistent player who could be dynamite after a Torts ass-kicking.

I know a Luongo-to-St. Louis trade has been bandied about here before.
 

ionicbluebird

Registered User
Apr 18, 2012
82
0
I'm a Canucks fan and yes, I think they should tank. I admire their enthusiasm tonight but in the best interests of the future of this team, they should tank unfortunately. They won't though.. because they are all professionals with pride.

As a fan of the franchise though, I'd be much happier with a great draft pick than likely one round of playoffs... or worse yet, we just barely miss the playoffs and end up with a crappy pick, and that's the most likely scenario.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,966
92,623
Vancouver, BC
I'm a Canucks fan and yes, I think they should tank. I admire their enthusiasm tonight but in the best interests of the future of this team, they should tank unfortunately. They won't though.. because they are all professionals with pride.

As a fan of the franchise though, I'd be much happier with a great draft pick than likely one round of playoffs... or worse yet, we just barely miss the playoffs and end up with a crappy pick, and that's the most likely scenario.

The difference between the #12 and #16 pick is negligible. Like a 3% higher chance of drafting an impact player.

If we could somehow have a strong chance of getting to the #1 overall pick this viewpoint might have some credibility. But we don't.

What you're saying is that you'd rather throw the whole season into the tank for essentially nothing. Which is utterly incomprehensible to me.
 

Jimson Hogarth*

Registered User
Nov 21, 2013
12,858
3
Everyone on this site has a better chance winning the lottery than the Canucks winning the cup

A few days before the trade deadline a couple years ago, people were saying that about LA.

Tanking is for losers. This organization should not mimic in any way the oilers organization of the past 10 years.
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,339
11,257
Los Angeles
Half of me wants to see the Nucks win the rest of the game and go into the playoffs.

Half of me want the team to continue to tank since that doesn't happen that often and if we can get a blue chipper this season, that would make the core transition smoother.
 

canuck4life16

It what it is-mccann
May 29, 2008
13,380
0
Vancity
The difference between the #12 and #16 pick is negligible. Like a 3% higher chance of drafting an impact player.

If we could somehow have a strong chance of getting to the #1 overall pick this viewpoint might have some credibility. But we don't.

What you're saying is that you'd rather throw the whole season into the tank for essentially nothing. Which is utterly incomprehensible to me.

yeah I don't think any team be that crazy to throw away the season for a high draft pick, it does not always work. plus 2014 draft is not that great. If we wanted to tank should have done it during 07/08 season
 

LiveeviL

No unique points
Jan 5, 2009
7,112
252
Sweden
Anyone thinking this team is good enough probably has only been following the Canucks since bout 2000/2001.

Team can beat St. Louis because the team scores about as well as Vancouver.

All Cali teams own the Canucks more than white on rice.

If Gillis decides to be buyers at the TDL he's a moron and completely delusional.

Yes you need to have followed the team since 1986/87 to evaluate this year's Canucks correctly.
 

ShouldveDraftedFiala

Registered User
Feb 20, 2007
1,964
220
Mod request. If you aren't going to create a separate thread for the post game, can you edit the title to include what post it begins at?
 

Drop the Sopel

Registered User
May 4, 2007
18,325
59
calgary
The difference between the #12 and #16 pick is negligible. Like a 3% higher chance of drafting an impact player.

If we could somehow have a strong chance of getting to the #1 overall pick this viewpoint might have some credibility. But we don't.

What you're saying is that you'd rather throw the whole season into the tank for essentially nothing. Which is utterly incomprehensible to me.

The Canucks have a decent shot at 7th overall. Could be a major difference between 7 and 15...

I don't think the odds of them making the playoffs are very good at all. The worst team in 2014 is going to finish the year 15-5 or thereabouts? I don't see it, even with the soft schedule.
 

Vankiller Whale

Fire Benning
May 12, 2012
28,802
16
Toronto
The Canucks have a decent shot at 7th overall. Could be a major difference between 7 and 15...

I don't think the odds of them making the playoffs are very good at all. The worst team in 2014 is going to finish the year 15-5 or thereabouts? I don't see it, even with the soft schedule.

According to this http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western/Pacific/Vancouver.html if we go 12-7-2 we have a 50% shot at the playoffs.

Grain of salt obviously, but it's far from an impossibilty.
 

Drop the Sopel

Registered User
May 4, 2007
18,325
59
calgary
According to this http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western/Pacific/Vancouver.html if we go 12-7-2 we have a 50% shot at the playoffs.

Grain of salt obviously, but it's far from an impossibilty.

Not impossible, just improbable.

If the Canucks had lost their 1st 2 games coming out of the Olympic break, you bet your ass I would cheer against them the rest of the way - and I don't know a bigger fan than myself...

I have seen enough 9th place finishes in my time.

Never mind how Kesler factors into all of this. Both his injury status, as well as trade status.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,966
92,623
Vancouver, BC
The Canucks have a decent shot at 7th overall. Could be a major difference between 7 and 15...

I don't think the odds of them making the playoffs are very good at all. The worst team in 2014 is going to finish the year 15-5 or thereabouts? I don't see it, even with the soft schedule.

See the post below yours. 12-7-2 is reasonable.

And attempting to tank doesn't guarantee tanking. Look at Calgary last year - trade Iginla and Bouwmeester, and start winning games. The idea that you'll get magical fairy losing dust by trading players doesn't really work. We're just as likely to finish 7th by trying to win as by trying to lose.

And again, the payoff isn't worth it. And cheering to lose is disgusting.
 

Wilch

Unregistered User
Mar 29, 2010
12,226
491
While I want the Canucks to draft high, if they're not getting a pick inside the 7 range, I'd rather they fight for a playoff spot.

I can see one of the top 5 talents falling to as far as 7th overall due to Burke going off the board. Anything less than that, we're going to take someone of similar calibre between 8-15. If the Canucks are going to tank, then tank all the way. If not, battle hard and get into the playoffs.

Would still prefer to see Kesler and Edler traded for young roster players/prospects/picks regardless. Would be what San Jose did, but on a much larger scale.
 

Vankiller Whale

Fire Benning
May 12, 2012
28,802
16
Toronto
Not impossible, just improbable.

If the Canucks had lost their 1st 2 games coming out of the Olympic break, you bet your ass I would cheer against them the rest of the way - and I don't know a bigger fan than myself...

I have seen enough 9th place finishes in my time.

Never mind how Kesler factors into all of this. Both his injury status, as well as trade status.

I'm not afraid of rebuilding but if this team can reignite a spark then I wouldn't want to smother it prematurely. We still have some time until the trade deadline. Let's see how it goes before we start cheering for a tank.
 

LickTheEnvelope

Weird time to be a Canucks fan 2024
Dec 16, 2008
39,203
6,213
Sidney, formerly Vancouver
Where the Nucks are I'd rather they fight for a playoff spot, but they are no where near a cup contender.

My ultimate fear is they win all these games before the trade deadline then trade more picks for rentals...
 

Drop the Sopel

Registered User
May 4, 2007
18,325
59
calgary
See the post below yours. 12-7-2 is reasonable.

And attempting to tank doesn't guarantee tanking. Look at Calgary last year - trade Iginla and Bouwmeester, and start winning games. The idea that you'll get magical fairy losing dust by trading players doesn't really work. We're just as likely to finish 7th by trying to win as by trying to lose.

And again, the payoff isn't worth it. And cheering to lose is disgusting.

You're more likely to win with good players and more likely to lose with less good players. Don't agree with the bolded...

If there were 10 games left and the Canucks had to go 10-0 to make the playoffs you're telling me you would be on the edge of your seat praying for a victory every night? Can't say I would be there along with you.

There could be a massive difference between drafting 6-7th overall and 16-17th overall.
 

Wilch

Unregistered User
Mar 29, 2010
12,226
491
You're more likely to win with good players and more likely to lose with less good players. Don't agree with the bolded...

If there were 10 games left and the Canucks had to go 10-0 to make the playoffs you're telling me you would be on the edge of your seat praying for a victory every night? Can't say I would be there along with you.

There could be a massive difference between drafting 6-7th overall and 16-17th overall.

With the way the team has been playing for this entire season, I'm led to believe if the Canucks acquired young roster players, the team's fate might actually change for the better.

A lot of the core guys just seem exhausted and have been playing like **** due to second guessing themselves and just being mentally fatigued in general.

Trading Kesler and Edler will either put this team into the abyss or it might re-ignite the team like it did with Calgary.
 

Drop the Sopel

Registered User
May 4, 2007
18,325
59
calgary
I'm not afraid of rebuilding but if this team can reignite a spark then I wouldn't want to smother it prematurely. We still have some time until the trade deadline. Let's see how it goes before we start cheering for a tank.

I'm not cheering for a tank, just find myself really indifferent to the results at this point. I don't see this team making the playoffs - too many injuries to the top players, too many passengers like Burrows/Booth and too much poor play in the last couple months.

Just not really emotionally invested in the outcomes at the moment. If they string a couple more wins together that probably changes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad