River Meadow
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2016
- 7,360
- 9,923
Oh he totally is....I know we're on our way back, amigo; I just really think Michkov might be the best Russsian draft pick in a long time...
Sure but past management contingents have zero to do with how HuGo and their appointees conduct business.I trust the consensus more than any specific team’s scouting dept — especially and particularly the Habs’ who haven’t had any notable success drafting productive forwards in a very long time.
Now some will say that HuGo deserve a clean slate but my response is simple: until the results change we cannot just assume these new bosses are better at drafting than the general consensus. It requires actual evidence.
We rarely drafted high character kid in the 1st round in the past 10-15 years..another “character” player
So you're one of "those" people ehIs 28 over 30 champ?
;/
He also needs to be the best at escaping the KHL, which of course is at the crux of Hughes’ risk assessment....I know we're on our way back, amigo; I just really think Michkov might be the best Russsian draft pick in a long time...
I’ve seen your comments on Michkov in recent weeks. I don’t think you apply the same strenuous approach to any other non-Russian player.
We aren’t sure anybody will succeed and we aren’t sure anybody will be in the NHL in three years. Happy now?
Of course this is true but changing the culture of an organization as conservative and pompous as the Habs is going to take longer than two years even IF the new guys (under the same bad owner) are full throttle into changing it.Sure but past management contingents have zero to do with how HuGo and their appointees conduct business.
Past Habs execs. failed in securing a bevy of productive forwards for some 3 decades. Doesn’t mean the new guys will do the same.
So you’re against drafting NCAA players as well?It got 0 to do with him being Russian but 100% to do with that 3 years deal.
Not one or two.....but 3 freaking years. He's freaking NHL ready.
If we would pick Michkov, without that contract, he's playing with the Habs next year.
If we were talking about a mid-prospect picked in the lower round, not NHLready, no problem it's fine, sign that 3 years deal.....
You guys seems so sure he will be there in 3 years.....but he just said NO to the NHL for 3 years without even letting the team that will draft him a chance to talk to him.
How can a kid with the dream of playing in the NHL, that could play next year, says no thanks for 3 more years???????????
With the bonuses , he would make even more money. I just don't get it!
That's a MAJOR red flag to me and yet, no one came up with an answer that make senses.
Lehkonen is a good player and is definitely more skilled than ppl here gave him credit for. He simply never had and still does not have Leonard's hands, passing ability, or shot. It just doesn't fit as a comparable beyond "good two way forward that works hard" which is just extremely vague and could describe dozens and dozens of players.Lehkonen was a ridiculous goal scorer in junior too...
![]()
TPS U20 2011-2012 - Roster, Stats & more
TPS U20 - U20 SM-liiga - hockey team page with roster, stats, transactions at eliteprospects.comwww.eliteprospects.com
Why not the Canadian Kucherov, Zach Benson?That article saying SJ likely taking Smith bummed me out. I just know Habs will not draft Michkov and go for another “character” player that will be a middle 6 or 4 player. Forgoing Michkov would be a massive mistake that I truly hope this management won’t make. Until shown otherwise, I have to think they’ll take Leonard as a Gally replacement and not add a Kucherov level talent in Michkov.![]()
Why not the Canadian Kucherov, Zach Benson?
There is also addition by subtraction as Geoff the fake hockey exec., is a lot less involved in the day to day hockey ops. compared to when he was Bergevin's direct overseer while prioritizing hotdog dissemination.Of course this is true but changing the culture of an organization as conservative and pompous as the Habs is going to take longer than two years even IF the new guys (under the same bad owner) are full throttle into changing it.
All those threatening to leave can now depart.Well, that settles all debates
Tactic has been used on this forum since time immemorial.All those threatening to leave can now depart.The exit is that way.
vvv
Let’s hope so. We recently learned that having an Uber-professionalized back office like the MLSE do with the Leafs is just as bad as the cowboy Geoff Molson style. Whatever works… but until it works I won’t just assume it’s working well.There is also addition by subtraction as Geoff the fake hockey exec., is a lot less involved in the day to day hockey ops. compared to when he was Bergevin's direct overseer while prioritizing hotdog dissemination.
My (meta meta analysis and therefore worthless to everyone analysis) order is as follows:..because the Russian one is better, imo...BPA...everything else is secondary...
Let’s hope so. We recently learned that having an Uber-professionalized back office like the MLSE do with the Leafs is just as bad as the cowboy Geoff Molson style. Whatever works… but until it works I won’t just assume it’s working well.
My (meta meta analysis and therefore worthless to everyone analysis) order is as follows:
Michkov
Benson
Smith
Everyone else is irrelevant at 5OA.
No offense, but then what's the point of any discussion at all?Why? What guarantee do we have?
Are you 100% sure this kid is a 100+ points player in the NHL?
That's question two.....cause question one is: Are you 100% sure this kid will play in the NHL in 3 years?
Answer is both no.
And he got fired too.
Having said that, this franchise isn't an entity and although you truly believe Michkov is the next McDavid, there's equal chances he end up just being a good 60 points players, this is a fact many of you refuse to see cause you think you know and you don't
I don't think the shocking part of the Dobber rankings is the top 10 personally.I don't know why that Dobber report is shocking. Benson has been ranked higher than Leonard and in the same tier as Smith, if not higher, all season
I think prime Dustin Brown, Adam Deadmarsh, Patrick Sharp are all good comparables for Leonard, he is in the same mold as those guys.Lehkonen is a good player and is definitely more skilled than ppl here gave him credit for. He simply never had and still does not have Leonard's hands, passing ability, or shot. It just doesn't fit as a comparable beyond "good two way forward that works hard" which is just extremely vague and could describe dozens and dozens of players.
The difference between their playstyle, passing ability, shot, and overall hands is evident from like a minute of highlights.
Isn’t MLSE a behemoth owning several sports franchises? They also seem to be extremely intrusive and are not good at delegating (based on how Leaf management has operated).Let’s hope so. We recently learned that having an Uber-professionalized back office like the MLSE do with the Leafs is just as bad as the cowboy Geoff Molson style. Whatever works… but until it works I won’t just assume it’s working well.
It got 0 to do with him being Russian but 100% to do with that 3 years deal.
Not one or two.....but 3 freaking years. He's freaking NHL ready.
If we would pick Michkov, without that contract, he's playing with the Habs next year.
If we were talking about a mid-prospect picked in the lower round, not NHLready, no problem it's fine, sign that 3 years deal.....
You guys seems so sure he will be there in 3 years.....but he just said NO to the NHL for 3 years without even letting the team that will draft him a chance to talk to him.
How can a kid with the dream of playing in the NHL, that could play next year, says no thanks for 3 more years???????????
With the bonuses , he would make even more money. I just don't get it!
That's a MAJOR red flag to me and yet, no one came up with an answer that make senses.
In 2018 I didn't want Zadina, I thought Tkachuk was a bigger version of Gallagher but I wanted KK over Tkachuk. Yeah, I didnt want Tkachuk as I thought we needed the upside that came with KK.I vaguely recall that ...
In 2012, Murray, Galchenyuk, Grigorenko, and Forsberg shared the hype.
In 2016, there was a lot of discussion of Tyson Jost, Logan Brown, and Michael McLeod.
In 2018, it was Zadina, Kotkaniemi, and Tkachuk.
Last year, the debate on here was on Slafkovsky versus Wright.
But this year it seems we're discussing a larger number of names.
Having said that, this franchise isn't an entity and although you truly believe Michkov is the next McDavid, there's equal chances he end up just being a good 60 points players, this is a fact many of you refuse to see cause you think you know and you don't
You should reread Milhouse's post since you completely missed his point.So you’re against drafting NCAA players as well?
Three years wait for a 17/18 year old is no big deal — it is a natural impediment to rushing the player. If he can cook in the KHL as a 19/20 year olds then his odds of busting in the NHL are even smaller. I don’t see how that is a red flag at all.
So you're one of "those" people eh
Ok so help me out here, champ.
Thought experiment time.
You're gonna have to use your imagination , or draw it on a piece of paper. Whatever helps you out more.
Say I have, like, a 30 gallon tank. Right?
And I fill that tank with, let's say, 28 gallons of water.
Would the tank appear almost full to you? Or does the tank appear more empty to you.