thebodyczech
Registered User
- Dec 5, 2005
- 1,016
- 0
Mike8 said:What do you feel has been poor about Quinn's coaching?
About the team being star-studded: I'm not sure this is an issue. The stars have very different styles of play. This should enable them to find respective roles, as they have in previous tournaments. There are quite a few players on this team that are more role-players than star-players as well (Doan, Draper, Foote, McCabe, Bouwmeester et al.)
Quinn certainly has the ability to use some very skilled players. Let's be honest, love or hate team Canada, I don't think anyone can say that this team is lacking in skill. But the team is still sticking to gritty play. I realize that checking, clutching and grabbing are standard with Canadian hockey, but when facing primarily skilled (ie: "European") teams, shouldn't the team perhaps focus more on the skill aspect on the game? Not on outhitting the opponent, but on outshooting and outskating the other team. I think that is largely why Toronto, incidentally, has struggled--because it focuses too much on the physical aspect of the game.
I also disagree with Quinn's lineup combinations and overall strategy. What Canada really needs is to be able to shift gears. The Finns, as we saw today, are able to carry out of their zone and, just like that, crank it up full gear. They change speeds swiftly and effectively. The Slovaks have shown that they can do so as well. These are the two teams that, incidentally, are undefeated in the tourney.
Just my observations.
Also: good point on the football analogy.