There should be no outrage about settling a lawsuit that was brought against them.
There should be outrage about their inaction, in terms of trying to prevent future situations or disciplining the players involved, after the lawsuit was settled.
You still don't get it. The former is linked to the latter.
It is
because we are outraged about their inaction to prevent future situations and discipline the players that we are
also outraged about the way it was settled in the first place. Both instances inform us on the thought process at Hockey Canada at the time and their disregard for sexual assaults and the welfare and safety of women.
You insist that settlements are just business as usual but continually ignore
the way it was settled. First they hire the most ruthless lawyers to "inquire" and then they give this girl hush money in exchange for leaving the names of the players out. Then they bury the story and when it resurfaces, they phrase everything in a damning way for the victim. When forced to answer in commission, they lie about facts.
It's fascinating to see you defend the process of this settlement when Hockey Canada themselves are now backpedaling. As you've done yourself a few times. Aren't you tired of it?
Like, who or what are you even trying to defend here?