agent082
Registered User
- Feb 11, 2012
- 3,999
- 1,005
Not on my broadcastDidn’t they just say on the broadcast it’s OT until someone scores
Not on my broadcastDidn’t they just say on the broadcast it’s OT until someone scores
Ok, now you are just being obtuse - or math is not your strong suit.so finland is missing 3 stars? Canada is missing 23.
Canada is still missing more per capita.
For sure it is. Canada is and will always be the Country of Hockey. There is still own merits of being unferdog.It's a nice option to have, to have this many star hockey players.
What a shame this can't end in the ever popular shootout.
Now perhaps looks like it but hes going to be bottom 2. Depends how theyall play next seasonMäättä easily.
Mom's spaghetti?My palms are sweating and i feel like puking pls win
Yes. Unless Mörkö shows up. He has something magical in him.3-on-3 OT surely favors Canada
No shootout![]()
Don't worry we can play Sund, Kaski and Anttila!wait OT is 3 on 3? ugh.
It's actually the best selection that the Finns have ever had to choose from.. plus they have 3 or 4 glorious goalies to choose from Lankanan, Rask, Saros and Rinne.It's a nice option to have, to have this many star hockey players.
First time in a World Championship thread? Welcome in.What's with the constant bickering from everyone about players who are missing from their team? You can tune in for the Olympics if this doesn't please you. It's always been this way.
So your argument is "we would've won but our team wasn't good enough". I mean... yeah, that does make sense.
I outlined the actual stars. The rest might be Finnish stars, but they're not hockey's stars. I wish I could include players like Laine (fallen off recently) and Puljujarvi (inconsistent) but let's be honest, the Canadian roster features stars of the sport itself.
He's been solid.I've become real comfortable with Power out there, that kid is real composed most times.
My palms are sweating and i feel like puking pls win