Huh...I never thought about it before, but that's a pretty good comp.He sort of reminds me of a Sebastian Aho
This guy must be the most posted non-lottery player on these boards with a huge draft projection range, from late 1st to 4rth round pick. His footage shows that he can be dynamic and I like how he is a rare Russian forward who has good 2-way potential, and I also like hearing about his strong leadership and work ethic. He sort of reminds me of a Sebastian Aho in speed, size, position, and 2 way threat.
I wouldn't mind if my Ducks finally drafted a Russian like him with our late 1st or 2nd round pick, but if they would be willing to go outside their norms to draft a small player, they would probably go with a North American like Bordeleau, Brisson, Niederbach... I don't even know if we have scouts in Russia and highly doubt we've visited MHL games much at all.
Huh...I never thought about it before, but that's a pretty good comp.
Especially since Aho went late 2nd, and then became a top 10 player in the draft, and you could make the case for top 5. That'll be Marat.
Less of a finisher and more of playmaker
He never even insinuated that Marat was a better playmaker.Not sure how he is more of playmaker. Both played 44 games in their respective U20 league. Aho had 34 assists, Khusnutdinov had 25. I get that there is more to playmaking than assists, but hard to say MK is ahead of Aho.
Many watch Khusnutdinov and are super impressed. I can appreciate that. He may play similar to Aho. I can appreciate that. But no way he is more talented as a playmaker. By the way, Aho did that in his 16-year-old season.
He specifically said "more of a playmaker" and "I think his ceiling is a similar level." You don't have to be Chomsky to make the connection that if they have a similar ceiling and Aho is more of a finisher, then MK by default is a better playmaker—because if he isn't then they don't have a similar ceiling.He never even insinuated that Marat was a better playmaker.
Yeah, as in Marat's play style is that he's a playmaker more so than a finisher. What about that is so hard to understand?He specifically said "more of a playmaker" and "I think his ceiling is a similar level." You don't have to be Chomsky to make the connection that if they have a similar ceiling and Aho is more of a finisher, then MK by default is a better playmaker—because if he isn't then they don't have a similar ceiling.
Not sure how he is more of playmaker. Both played 44 games in their respective U20 league. Aho had 34 assists, Khusnutdinov had 25. I get that there is more to playmaking than assists, but hard to say MK is ahead of Aho.
Many watch Khusnutdinov and are super impressed. I can appreciate that. He may play similar to Aho. I can appreciate that. But no way he is more talented as a playmaker. By the way, Aho did that in his 16-year-old season.
Aho is 6’0. Khusnutdinov is 5’9. What am I missing?
Is Getzlaf similar to McDavid?
Khusnutdinov is one of the younger players in the draft. Have you measured him personally?
In any case - is Brayden Point (5'10") similar to Aho? Yes. Is Marchessault (5'9") a similar player stylistically? Yes. A couple of inches of height doesn't make a player Getzlaf vs McDavid. There are plenty of big guys that play small and plenty of small guys that play big. Aho competes hard but he doesn't play like a power forward. Physical size is less and less important in an evolving NHL.
Again it makes it difficult to directly compare to Aho's stats. Just a stylistic comparison overall.
I would agree that MK could have Marchessault's ceiling (except for the 1st VGK season when Marchessault, W. Karlsson, Haula, Smith all produced 20-25% more than in any season before or after).Yes. Is Marchessault (5'9") a similar player stylistically?
I stated I appreciate the stylistic comparison. It is fully supported by the eye-test. However, "ceiling" isn't about style it is about production. As I stated in an earlier post, this is quite reminiscent of the Moneyball scene when scouts are adamant that a baseball prospect "looks" great because he is a 5-tool player and the ball explodes off his bat. Billy Beane wonders why he is a .230 hitter.
I would agree that MK could have Marchessault's ceiling (except for the 1st VGK season when Marchessault, W. Karlsson, Haula, Smith all produced 20-25% more than in any season before or after).
To recap: I think it is reasonable to call MK's ceiling a hyper-competitive 60-point player; based on his production in junior leagues and international competition it is a stretch to say his ceiling is 85 points in the NHL.
I don't see it what baseball has to do with a pass-first center. Khusnutdinov had the highest pass completions and high danger pass completions per 60 that has been tracked so far by Scouching.
Thanks for the details—because I am not trying to be difficult. I have enjoyed many of the Scouting videos and think he has terrific insights.
What baseball and pass-first centers have in common is that ultimately results matter. Take Aho's season with 34 assists in the U20. Neither player who scored tons of goals on that 13-14 team has proven to be much of a scorer since. Aho made them better. The statistics don't show Marat doing that on any team—U20 or international. My guess is that Scouch is in the early phases on analytics regarding passing. So this is where I can make a comparison to baseball. Early on analysts would track % of line drives and think that a hitter with a high percentage of line drivers but average batting average was snake bit. Since then they have refined what they measure. Marat might be the best passer among prospects, but there is also the possibility that if other things were measured more accurately (say speed at which the player receiving the pass is moving, distance receiver has to reach along the ice to control the pass, location of the nearest opponent, etc.) then the good but not elite production might actually be the product of good but not elite skills.
I hope you are correct and that the Canes take MK and he is another Aho. That would be a great outcome. However, what I hope and what I see in the statistics don't always match.
I just don't agree with that simplistic of a view.