That's what BB mentions. I also think he's either a lower line scoring center (worst case) or could turn out to be a Pastrnak style winger.I think that while he looks ready in some regards to play in Rochester, whether he does go there vs. he CHL may well depend on whether the Sabres want to develop him at C vs. the W. Or if there are specific aspects of his game they think he can develop more readily at a lower level....
For example, according the folks at HockeyProspect (which I assume either @Chainshot or @Der Jaeger mentioned earlier in this thread), the thing that they say held Kulich back is the lack of high end playmaking. It's one of the reasons he likely slipped a bit in the draft and also why they think it's more likely that he's a W instead of a C, depending on how that part of his game does/doesn't develop. I think he's more likely to be able to take a top line role in that regard and develop that part of his game if put into the CHL for a year rather than going straight to Rochester, given his age and being his first year on NA size ice.
And of course, the good thing of course is that because he's drafted from Europe, we could take him out of the CHL after 1 year and then put him in the AHL. I think him being utterly dominant there and playing 1st line, 1st PP, PK, etc., it might be more likely to happen there vs. Rochester.
It may come down to what the Sabres thinks of Cape Breton specifically in terms of their strength at developing players, or if they tell them he'll only play in the Q if they can trade him to Team X or Y if they feel there are a few other teams where they'd prefer to have him play.
I like him on the wing better. Savoie and Ostlund are unambiguously centers, so, Kulich to the wing seems like a no brainer.That's what BB mentions. I also think he's either a lower line scoring center (worst case) or could turn out to be a Pastrnak style winger.
That's what BB mentions. I also think he's either a lower line scoring center (worst case) or could turn out to be a Pastrnak style winger.
Agree. I think Savoie and Ostlund are centers in the long term, with Kulich moving to wing to take advantage of how he can drive on defenders and his shot.I like him on the wing better. Savoie and Ostlund are unambiguously centers, so, Kulich to the wing seems like a no brainer.
I think Kulich is going to surprise. I don't see Kulich as the smooth operator that Pastrnak is, but in terms of driving offensive from the wing, I think Kulich can do it.Yes, Brad Allen from HP has also said on their SiriusXM radio show on a few occasions that he could either be a bottom 6 C or play higher in the lineup on the W.
I don't agree with the Pasternak comparison though, just because he is a great playmaker and play driver, and I don't think Kulich has that kind of 1st line play-driving upside. He could certainly be a responsible complementary winger in the top 6, however.
But if ends up being an ELITE 3rd line W or C who is a great defensively and a threat to score 20-25 goals while also being a fixture on both the PP & PK and be used in all situations, that's a pretty damn good player and might be the ideal spot for him given all the other skilled wingers who likely project as top 6 guys. IMO of course.
What's good is that, like Boston, if the Sabres develop their kids right, Kulich won't have to. Pastrnak can certainly drive a line, but he doesn't have to in Boston. I think Kulich may be headed to that same type of role. I don't see him outside the top 6.
Maybe he is diamond?Literally.
That jaw line could cut diamonds.
Yeah, his play in the tournament screams wing to me. I've gone back and re-read the Black Book report on him and it lines up pretty well with what I've seen.I lean toward wing right now, but however he develops, he develops. Parts of his game against his peers that stands out to me is his effort in puck retrieval over a full 200'. He's not just dogged on the forecheck, but he puts in the work up and down the ice. That's at least my additional takeaway from this U20's tournament. Finishing ability - both positionally and technically - and a commitment to a 200' game? Yes please.