FWIW Abruzzese '99, Smith late '98Zegras is 1 of 5 freshman to average a point per game in college hockey
nick abruzzese 1.2
Cole caufield 1.1
Nathan Smith 1.07
Zegras 1.06
On the cusp
alex turcotte .94
Also since 2015:Zegras is 1 of 5 freshman to average a point per game in college hockey
nick abruzzese 1.2
Cole caufield 1.1
Nathan Smith 1.07
Zegras 1.06
On the cusp
alex turcotte .94
Also since 2015:
Tkachuk 0.78 (draft season)
Q Hughes 1.03 (D+1)
Farabee 0.97 (D+1)
Mittelstadt 0.88 (D+1)
Poehling 0.87 (D+1)
Keller 1.45 (D+1)
Kunin 1.09 (D+1)
Thompson 0.94 (D+1)
Frederic 1.10 (D+1)
Gambrell 1.11 (D+1)
Anderson 0.95 (D+1)
Harper 0.98 (D+1)
Laczynski 0.94 (D+1)
Werenski 1.00 (D+1)
Connor 1.87 (D+1)
White 1.16 (D+1)
Boeser 1.43 (D+1)
etc.
Some decent company for the most part. Numbers don’t really fly out, though, but this is just stat-watching.
Yeah, obviously he’s a different level of prospect, I’m just saying that 1.04 PPG in D+1 puts him in the range of guys who pretty uninspiring NHLers right now. Same goes for Turcotte. Obviously there are way more factors involved, just pointing out that their numbers are really nothing to write home about at this point.Not un good company around 1ppg...
The only 3 young star foward are around 1,45 and more rest are depth guys at thé moment
BTW i’m a huge Zegras fan, stats are juste good not amazing, I expect big WJC
Wonder how much this weighs overall talent around him compared to say Conner who’s team was loadedYeah, obviously he’s a different level of prospect, I’m just saying that 1.04 PPG in D+1 puts him in the range of guys who pretty uninspiring NHLers right now. Same goes for Turcotte. Obviously there are way more factors involved, just pointing out that their numbers are really nothing to write home about at this point.
Totaly agree, I didn’t read it that way ! We say same thingYeah, obviously he’s a different level of prospect, I’m just saying that 1.04 PPG in D+1 puts him in the range of guys who pretty uninspiring NHLers right now. Same goes for Turcotte. Obviously there are way more factors involved, just pointing out that their numbers are really nothing to write home about at this point.
I've watched about four-five games I think he looks fine, the team as a whole hasn't always given complete games but it is a pretty young team and on the offensive side he generates a lot. I still think he has a lot of room to grow both offensively and in general, would like to see him put the puck in the net a bit more and see his plays get finished more but I'm not concerned really, he's doing wellHas anyone on here been watching BU games that can comment on his play? His highlights look good but that's just a small piece of the puzzle.
I don't think so, but they do both have an electric qualityIs Mitch Marner a good comp for Zegras?
Every time I see Zegras play (which I admit has been limited) his electric playmaking ability reminds me a lot of Marner
Just was curious if I was in the minority on that one
Holland passing on Zegras to select Broberg is such a bone headed move.
I honestly think if Broberg or Seider were there at 9 w/ zegras….. the ducks would have taken them over him also... luckily oilers/redwings took em off the board.Holland passing on Zegras to select Broberg is such a bone headed move.
Agreed... I think reversed roles, Anaheim chooses Seider too.This game would've been a lot harder to watch if Seider hadn't played so well.
Both players looked really good. Thankfully it's not a move we're having to regret.
You guys definitely got the best of the 2 2 defendersThis game would've been a lot harder to watch if Seider hadn't played so well.
Both players looked really good. Thankfully it's not a move we're having to regret.
Don't think so, I think if Ducks had 3rd pick they would have took Zegras. He is everything the Ducks are missing, he's electrifying.I honestly think if Broberg or Seider were there at 9 w/ zegras….. the ducks would have taken them over him also... luckily oilers/redwings took em off the board.