Is he really more gritty/physical than Backstrom? From what I’ve seen, he has a good compete level, is strong on the puck and wins puck battles, but isn’t a big hitter or anything like that. All of that describes Backstrom too - he’s also a smaller forward who competes super hard, wins puck battles, and is very strong on the puck.william eklund is gritty and physical, so not really similiar to backstrom and nylander.
Is he really more gritty/physical than Backstrom?.
All of that describes Backstrom too - he’s also a smaller forward who competes super hard, wins puck battles, and is very strong on the puck.
Yeah, "average sized" is probably more fair than "smaller" for Backstrom. But for a guy who's generally listed at 6', sometimes 6'1", he plays a pretty "strong" game - not nasty, but very good at winning battles and damn hard to knock off the puck. I see some of that in Eklund too, though he's a bit smaller than Backstrom.He's 97 kg (214lbs) no? I don't know if I'd describe him as a "smaller forward"
Poor kid is cursed, just left the ice in the 2nd period with a possible wrist/arm injury after this
I didn't think he was as fast/quick as Bratt.Closest one I can think of is Jesper Bratt.
Kid can't catch a break.
Who would you compare him to?
Last year he came up and practiced one time, so I said to "Robban"(the coach) that this kid is as good as it gets. He answered "Yes, I like him too". Then I think he practiced one more time, and I said "You don't f***ing send him down again. He's staying here." So I'll take some cred. No, but he's really good. Twists and turns and is hard to get. Strong legs. I think he has everything, really.