SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 16,196
- 15,816
Or do the Avs have the cap space to resign them this summer if they turn out to be a good fit with the club? I think they're both great pickups.
Or do the Avs have the cap space to resign them this summer if they turn out to be a good fit with the club? I think they're both great pickups.
Well Coyle is signed for next year so he's definitely not a rental.Or do the Avs have the cap space to resign them this summer if they turn out to be a good fit with the club? I think they're both great pickups.
Coyle is signed through next year, but if he struggles, I could see Cmac flipping him in the offseason. Nelson is a tougher one. We paid a lot for him, but he could absolutely make more in the open market and has no reason to give the Avs any sort of discount. Be it term or money. He's also going to be 34 next year. Signing an older player that should be regressing more than he has already, is very risky. In the end, I expect they will keep one, but not the other. Which though? I got no clue.Or do the Avs have the cap space to resign them this summer if they turn out to be a good fit with the club? I think they're both great pickups.
Yup. I still remember game one with kariya and selanne. Was such a wonderful game and hopes were sky high….. then the rest of the season happenedThey’ve played one game. Let’s wait and see.
Coyle is signed through next year and surely in the team’s plans.
If Nelson fits in well, I would imagine the team makes a strong effort to extend him.
They’ve played one game. Let’s wait and see.
Coyle is signed through next year and surely in the team’s plans.
If Nelson fits in well, I would imagine the team makes a strong effort to extend him.
Good call.....we need to see how it all plays out before offering contracts.
You don't want to sign a new guy to a 24 year contract? Who are you and what have you done with Sea Eagles?
Is it allowed for him to get a few games in the AHL for conditioning just before the playoffs without counting against the cap?
Do you think it's realistic that Landeskog actually gets an AHL stint? It would truly suck for him to go through three years of rehab only to get injured again by some no-name AHL goon before he even pays for the Avs again.Yes.
--
- Purpose of Conditioning Stints:
These stints are designed for players who have been on LTIR (Long-Term Injured Reserve) to get some game action and work their way back to full playing form.
- Duration:
The conditioning loan can last for up to six days or three games, whichever comes first.
- Waiver Rule:
Players on LTIR conditioning loans do not need to pass through waivers to be sent to the AHL affiliate.
- Extension:
Teams can request an extension of two additional games beyond the initial conditioning stint, but this requires approval from the NHL Commissioner.
- Example:
The Maple Leafs recently sent Jani Hakanpää and Connor Dewar to the Marlies on LTIR conditioning loans.
- Player Status:
Players on LTIR conditioning loans remain on the NHL's LTIR list and do not count against the NHL roster or salary cap until they are deemed ready to return to play.
Woth the rising cap, I don't think 5 million for an upper echelon 3C (who can be an adequate 2C in injury situations) is an overpayment at allCoyle is unfortunately our overpaid 3C next year, maybe 2C with how management has run things post cup.
Do you think it's realistic that Landeskog actually gets an AHL stint? It would truly suck for him to go through three years of rehab only to get injured again by some no-name AHL goon before he even pays for the Avs again.
Well Coyle isn't a rental, he's for sure back.
They have plenty of cap space assuming Landeskog doesn't return(Which we'll see on that). But even with Landy back they can move a couple other guys to create the space to keep Nelson.
IMO Nelson is going to look amazing with the Avs and both sides will want to get a nice deal done.
Agree 100%.Woth the rising cap, I don't think 5 million for an upper echelon 3C (who can be an adequate 2C in injury situations) is an overpayment at all![]()
Woth the rising cap, I don't think 5 million for an upper echelon 3C (who can be an adequate 2C in injury situations) is an overpayment at all![]()
I would love to see Nelson on a 4x8M extension. Slots in really well to the current structure.