StayAtHomeAv
Registered User
- May 20, 2014
- 6,681
- 127
With the number 3 pick you shouldn't be drafting on position need, especially in this draft. Dallas needs to take who they think is the best player available when they're on the clock. That might be Vilardi, it may be Heiskanen, it could be someone else.I expect him to be the third selection in the draft by Dallas. Whether he does much damage in the NHL with Benn remains to be seen, as Benn is turning 28 this summer. I could see Vilardi playing two more seasons in the OHL considering his younger age for this draft.
In any event, I expect Dallas to go with Vilardi as their prospect depth as forward is a greater prospect need than defensive prospects at this point for that organization.
It should raise some interesting questions at number 4 as Colorado could go in any number of directions. The conventional thought is that the Avs would almost certainly draft a defenseman, but historically the Avs have not selected a defenseman than high in the draft. They may also resist against potentially forcing a pick based on need, although I am not sure that would be the case in this draft at that particular selection.
McKenzie was the beneficiary of most of Glass' passes. He improved from 8 goals last season to 42 goals this season. Glass assisted on 25 of those goals, 19 of which were primary assists.Cody Glass - WHL - 2016-17
...
Most Common Teammates:
80.95% - Skyler McKenzie
52.38% - Caleb Jones
51.7% - Keegan Iverson
36.73% - Henri Jokiharju
34.69% - Brendan De Jong
It is shocking to note that, out of Vilardi's 29 goals, 32 assists, 61 points in 49 games this season, Julius Nattinen only assisted on 6 of Vilardi's goals, converted 4 goals where Vilardi was credited with an assist, and shared the assist log with Vilardi three other times. In summary, Nattinen factored in on only 13 of Vilardi's 61 points this season. Despite playing all of that time together, Vilardi was entirely unproductive playing with Nattinen. The two were first placed together on a line on November 6, 2016.Gabriel Vilardi - OHL - 2016-17
...
Most Common Teammates:
52.73% - Julius Nattinen
47.27% - Jalen Chatfield
37.27% - Jeremiah Addison
37.27% - Sean Day
35.45% - Mikhail Sergachev
With the number 3 pick you shouldn't be drafting on position need, especially in this draft. Dallas needs to take who they think is the best player available when they're on the clock. That might be Vilardi, it may be Heiskanen, it could be someone else.
The numbers reflect poor chemistry between Vilardi and Nattinen.
I think a few issues were at play.I've seen a couple of tweets from OHL watchers saying that Windsor's scoring was lower across the board than it should have been for the calibre of forwards they were icing, and put it down to Rocky Thompson's poor coaching. Anyone else get that impression?
Also, not too many people seem to be mentioning the injuries Vilardi dealt with this year, from a knee problem that meant he missed training camp and the start of the seaosn, and then an appendectomy that caused him to miss a bunch of games.
Teams lists are so different this year I could see on draft day it seeming like teams are drafting on need, when really they just have a certain guy higher than other teams.Typically teams take a BPA approach to higher picks, which is the right approach IMO. However, due to the volatility in this years ranking after the first couple of selections, I think that we may very well see teams take organizational need/depth into consideration.
In any event, Vilardi is the clear number three selection according to McKenzie's most recent scout polling.
I've seen a couple of tweets from OHL watchers saying that Windsor's scoring was lower across the board than it should have been for the calibre of forwards they were icing, and put it down to Rocky Thompson's poor coaching. Anyone else get that impression?
Also, not too many people seem to be mentioning the injuries Vilardi dealt with this year, from a knee problem that meant he missed training camp and the start of the seaosn, and then an appendectomy that caused him to miss a bunch of games.
I think a few issues were at play.
Their top players were injured on and off (Vilardi and Brown) which meant they had trouble finding stable lines and finding chemistry. They also made major additions at the TDL which again shook up their top 6 (Bracco).
They also seemed to run a more balanced approach than running a stacked top line, which will always slightly depress guys numbers. Thompson plays a quite defensive style. While I think Thompson was at fault, to solely blame it on him is reaching. There was a lot at play.
He was kneed by Rasmussen at Hlinka camp, so not sure he could have avoided that injury. But yeah, nobody's injuries get the deep probe that Patrick is subject to.
Never thanked you two for the background on Vilardi. Any Mem Cup watchers have any thoughts on how he's stacked up so far?
He's been good, not terrific. Over the course of the year my read on Vilardi is that not only is he not quick on his feet, he doesn't process the game at an elite-level pace. Certainly he has great vision and good hands, but doesn't always pick up on the small windows that are available to make dangerous plays the way that say Cody Glass can. He also loses more puck battles than he should at his strength due to sub-optimal body positioning. Still, lots to like, including strong defensive play.
I've seen some of these charts comparing Cody Glass to Ryan Johansen, Nolan Patrick, and Mark Scheifele.
I'll use those same categories to compare his statistics with Gabe Vilardi's. If one looks at Vilardi's statistics this season and is unimpressed, it is because of the assist totals.
Games Played: 48 GP (Vilardi) vs 69 GP (Glass)
Goals/Game: 0.59 (Vilardi) vs 0.46 (Glass)
Primary Assists/Game: 0.39 (Vilardi) vs 0.52 (Glass)
Secondary Assists/Game: 0.27 (Vilardi) vs 0.39 (Glass)
Points/Game: 1.24 (Vilardi) vs 1.38 (Glass)
Primary Points/Game: 0.98 (Vilardi) vs 0.99 (Glass)
5v5 Goals/Game: 0.35 (Vilardi) vs 0.29 (Glass)
5v5 Primary Assists/Game: 0.31 (Vilardi) vs 0.39 (Glass)
5v5 Secondary Assists/Game: 0.12 (Vilardi) vs 0.23 (Glass)
5v5 Points/Game: 0.78 (Vilardi) vs 0.91 (Glass)
5v5 Primary Points/Game: 0.65 (Vilardi) vs 0.68 (Glass)
*data for Gabriel Vilardi sourced from Prospect-stats.com
http://prospect-stats.com/WHL/2016/player/26958/
McKenzie was the beneficiary of most of Glass' passes. He improved from 8 goals last season to 42 goals this season. Glass assisted on 25 of those goals, 19 of which were primary assists.
http://prospect-stats.com/OHL/2016/player/7156/
It is shocking to note that, out of Vilardi's 29 goals, 32 assists, 61 points in 49 games this season, Julius Nattinen only assisted on 6 of Vilardi's goals, converted 4 goals where Vilardi was credited with an assist, and shared the assist log with Vilardi three other times. In summary, Nattinen factored in on only 13 of Vilardi's 61 points this season. Despite playing all of that time together, Vilardi was entirely unproductive playing with Nattinen. The two were first placed together on a line on November 6, 2016.
To compare, Max Fortier contributed to 47.9% of Nico Hischier's point totals from the start of the season to the World Juniors break when I last crunched those numbers. Last season, Jayce Hawryluk contributed to 67.05% of Nolan Patrick's 2015-16 totals. If you want to talk about a player not producing with his main linemate, you need only to look at Nattinen, who contributed to 21.3% of Vilardi's point total this season. The forward with the next-most amount of time playing with Vilardi was Jeremiah Addison, who assisted on 8 of Vilardi's goals and factored in on 19 of Vilardi's points: 31.1%. Logan Brown factored in on 6 of Vilardi's goals and 17 of Vilardi's points despite not being in the Top 5 of players who spent the most time on ice with Vilardi -- Vilardi, conversely, assisted on 7 of Brown's goals, more than the number of Nattinen's goals he assisted on.
The numbers reflect poor chemistry between Vilardi and Nattinen.
Vilardi had 14 points in his first 9 games of the season (1.55 points per game) on a line with Logan Brown. After he was moved to the Nattinen line, Vilardi recorded 47 points in 39 games (1.21 points per game). I noticed while watching these two play together that they completely lack chemistry. One must also note that Nattinen was Eeli Tolvanen's center at the 2017 World Juniors.
I may be starting to be swayed that the OHL is the tougher league this draft year, and in turn will reflect better on Gabe Vilardi.
This is a bit misleading. Patrick was nearly 6 months younger when he played in his 17 year old season
This is a bit misleading. Patrick was nearly 6 months younger when he played in his 17 year old season
4 points ok great, still underwhelming for a player touted as the 3rd or 4th top prospect this year.
4 points ok great, still underwhelming for a player touted as the 3rd or 4th top prospect this year.