QJL
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2014
- 6,349
- 4,717
Kreider is the exception, not the rule.
Physical specimens are the exception. I think Kreider and Letourneau are both top 5 physically gifted players in their respective draft years.
Kreider is the exception, not the rule.
Wouldn't be too upset if the Flames took him at #28. Might as well take a couple big swings with 8 picks in the first 4 rounds.
Obviously a bit of a project but I like the way he thinks the game, and his defensive acumen is already quality.
I meant that Kreider turning out to become a 25-30 goals per season guy coming directly out of HS or HS-Prep is the exception, not the rule.
Most guys who are drafted directly out of MN HS, HS-Prep (anywhere) tend to become nothing of note, especially if they bypass the USHL. Higher profile guys who go this route nowadays tend to top out at Mark Jankowski (decent depth, nothing special) or Riley Tufte (AAAA type). At least with Casey Mittelstadt, he had a decent USHL sample size. Jay O'Brien (late birthday, worth noting) went from HS-Prep to the NCAA and completely busted, but it's not his fault the Flyers drafted him 25-30 picks too high.
Despite not putting up points, I think he looked good in his USHL games. As good as a 1st rounder? Probably not. Good enough that I think he would have had a decent season in the USHL if he had played there all year (ie: PPG player).what are the actual chances he becomes an NHL player? I don't really know how to gage him based on where he's played. I know he's going to Boston college and I know he didn't do much in 2 games at the USHL.
I agree. He did well. Good enough to the point where you figure he’d have put up points in the USHL. Now obviously that doesn’t guarantee he’ll be an NHL’er. There are guys who put up points in junior as first year draft eligible who don’t even get drafted.Despite not putting up points, I think he looked good in his USHL games. As good as a 1st rounder? Probably not. Good enough that I think he would have had a decent season in the USHL if he had played there all year (ie: PPG player).
Another thing worth noting that he would have much less pressure on him if he's drafted in the 2nd round as opposed to the 1st round. Merely having a "1" next to your name will mean that fans (especially in bigger hockey markets) will be expecting a ton out of you, to be a top 6 forward at minimum. Whereas if you have a "2" next to your name, most fans will have tempered, lower hyped expectations. Best example is Morgan Frost versus Isaac Ratcliffe: Frost was taken just 8 picks ahead of Ratcliffe, but because Frost has a "1" next to his name, Flyers fans' expectations have been quite high, whereas with Ratcliffe, the average Flyers fans generally ignored him post draft.
I don't think his playstyle is similar to Riley Tufte. Letourneau skates better and imo has better hockey sense. His main problem is that he plays kinda slow (slow pace) that he'll need to improve to get to the NHL.The next Riley Tufte
Actually Ratcliffe was quite overhyped. I would say the most reason for what you said has more to do with the fact that Frost nearly doubled his production in d+1 while Ratcliffe was almost at half.Another thing worth noting is that he would have much less pressure on him if he's drafted in the 2nd round as opposed to the 1st round. Merely having a "1" next to your name will mean that fans (especially in bigger hockey markets) will be expecting a ton out of you, to be a top 6 forward at minimum. Whereas if you have a "2" next to your name, most fans will have tempered, lower hyped expectations. Best example is Morgan Frost versus Isaac Ratcliffe: Frost was taken just 8 picks ahead of Ratcliffe, but because Frost has a "1" next to his name, Flyers fans' expectations have been quite high, whereas with Ratcliffe, the average Flyers fans generally ignored him post draft.
Is there anything to make of Jack Good, his teammate with similarly great numbers?
Wouldn't be too upset if the Flames took him at #28. Might as well take a couple big swings with 8 picks in the first 4 rounds.
Obviously a bit of a project but I like the way he thinks the game, and his defensive acumen is already quality.
Habs are likely to trade the Jets pick, but the Habs seem to like him. They've had a meeting with him earlier in the year and also at the combine.Agree 100% with this. Want to see Conroy swing for the fences with the late first or a second.
I can dream about picking the next Tage Thompson at 28th, although he may be the next Mark Jankowski…
I'm talking about the average fan, not the prospect diehards. Blackhawks fans had expectations for Kevin Hayes, not big expectations for Ludvig Rensfeldt.Actually Ratcliffe was quite overhyped. I would say the most reason for what you said has more to do with the fact that Frost nearly doubled his production in d+1 while Ratcliffe was almost at half.
You won’t find a Devils fan more excited about Stillman vs Casey or a Habs fan, Mesar vs Hutson. Honestly I’m not even sure if the average Habs fan prefers Mesar over Beck
Also going to BC next year, with the Ranger’s top prospect.He’s linked a lot in these mocks to the Rangers. More so than any other team and they are linked to him more so than any other player.
They’ve also successfully drafted out of SAC too with Morgan Barron. If he didn’t turn into an NHL’er they might’ve been turned off from taking a Canadian prep player.Also going to BC next year, with the Ranger’s top prospect.
Barron was like a 6th round pick, so the risk vs reward is pretty much non-existent. There's a bit of a risk with drafting a player in the first round out of Canadian prep school.They’ve also successfully drafted out of SAC too with Morgan Barron. If he didn’t turn into an NHL’er they might’ve been turned off from taking a Canadian prep player.
Teams like to go back to paths they’ve had success with. Of course it’s not the same taking a 6th rounder as 1st rounder, but usually when teams go back to a well that worked for them in the past the storylines aren’t exactly the same.Barron was like a 6th round pick, so the risk vs reward is pretty much non-existent. There's a bit of a risk with drafting a player in the first round out of Canadian prep school.
This is a swing and miss type of players to draft and someone will take him late first or early second especially if they have several top 64 picks.Despite not putting up points, I think he looked good in his USHL games. As good as a 1st rounder? Probably not. Good enough that I think he would have had a decent season in the USHL if he had played there all year (ie: PPG player).