Mr Buckles
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2018
- 416
- 760
That fantastic bas&*%^Empty net goal - 51 goals - 100 points
That fantastic bas&*%^Empty net goal - 51 goals - 100 points
51 goals and 100 points in 62 games, good for 4th in WHL scoring after a really slow start. Tanner Howe had 69 points, Nijhoff had 49, Dubinsky had 49, and top-scoring d-man Ryker Evans had 61.
McDavid’s D-1 saw him score 28 goals and 99 points in 56 games, good for 4th in the OHL. Connor Brown had 128 points, Dane Fox had 107, Burakovsky had 87, and top-scoring d-man Adam Pelech had 54 in 60.
Despite the very cold start on the stat sheet, Bedard’s D-1 is really indubitably more impressive.
It’s really quite amazing given (the lack of) what the kid had to work with. It eased off a little as the season progressed with Howe proving to be a genuine threat in himself, but I can vividly remember a few games I watched where it was a mixture of sad and amusing how opposing teams committed their entire defensive strategy on containing Bedard.Some of the mid January takes on Bedard falling off the generational path are quite entertaining. Amazing season for this kid!
44 goals + 46 assists in his final 48 games.
51 goals and 100 points in 62 games, good for 4th in WHL scoring after a really slow start. Tanner Howe had 69 points, Nijhoff had 49, Dubinsky had 49, and top-scoring d-man Ryker Evans had 61.
McDavid’s D-1 saw him score 28 goals and 99 points in 56 games, good for 4th in the OHL. Connor Brown had 128 points, Dane Fox had 107, Burakovsky had 87, and top-scoring d-man Adam Pelech had 54 in 60.
Despite the very cold start on the stat sheet, Bedard’s D-1 is really indubitably more impressive.
His draft stock is already through the roof lolKids unreal. He'll absolutely toy with the WJC in August. His draft stock will go through the roof. If he puts in a consistent season next year from start to finish and has some support, look out.
I think any argument with 3 ">s" was always silly.The takes in the earlier threads of Michkov >>> Bedard are looking awfully silly now
That’s not what I said is it? Of course they’re close as prospects. All things being equal Bedard will very clearly end up first overall though due to Michkov contract and the Russia thing.I think any argument with 3 ">s" was always silly.
But the opinion that Michkov > Bedard is far from silly, even with Bedard's excellent close to the season.
I didn't say you didThat’s not what I said is it?
Of course they’re close as prospects. All things being equal Bedard will very clearly end up first overall though due to Michkov contract and the Russia thing.
It was the mostly Russian posters who acted like he was on an entire other planet of prospect due to Bedard’s slow start that look ridiculous
Free from any hiccups? Ya that's about what I'd expect. Injuries, cold spells, maybe more COVID interruptions, etc I'd say 60g+60a is the safe bet.70 goals, 145 points next year?
That would be a truly insane draft year, especially as it’s not like more help is on the way. Howe being a year older will be significant, but top d-man Evans is aging out…the Pats are in a weird spot where they simply have to make moves to strengthen the team for Bedard’s last year to make a playoff run, but they honestly project to still have such a weak roster next year you’d seriously question them giving up futures for short-term help.70 goals, 145 points next year?
70 goals, 145 points next year?