Garthinater
Registered User
- Nov 22, 2015
- 2,841
- 1,483
So has Bracco.
There is no reason to think that Matthews, as a 17 year old, would have challenged Eichel for the Hobey Baker.![]()
Prove where bracco out preformed eichel lol
So has Bracco.
There is no reason to think that Matthews, as a 17 year old, would have challenged Eichel for the Hobey Baker.![]()
So has Bracco.
There is no reason to think that Matthews, as a 17 year old, would have challenged Eichel for the Hobey Baker.![]()
why? I'm not saying he would have won, but he would be a finalist. If you can't agree with that, then we are far apart how we view Matthews
No, he entered the college season highly thought of, with people thinking he could challenge McDavid before McDavid blew up at the start of the season. And trying to compare NLA to NCAA is hard, one season isn't clearly better than the other. Matthews had the 2nd highest ppg of players who played 15 games and the highest gpg in the NLA. He's had better performances at most comparable tournaments at the same age. Also, they are both in the same tier along with Tavares, and Stamkos of recent centers at the top of the draft. Personally, I'll take Matthews more complete all around game over Eichels more dynamic skill set.Okay everyone. Eichel was outscored by Matthews on the US team, yes. But his catapult to Tavares/Stamkos level prospect came in his predraft season in the NCAA, which was more impressive by eye and by NHL scoring equivalence than Matthews' draft season this year, which he went through months older than Eichel was during his. THAT is when Eichel separated himself a bit, and THAT is why he would have gone second had they been in the same draft.
Yes, you're are correct. Given you believe that after one season of NTDP Matthews would have challenged Eichel for the Hobey Baker we are 'far apart' on how we view him.
Matthews has played against NCAA college teams as a 16/17 year old, that's a big part of USDP's success with developing players with that U-18 US team.
I'm not sure what Eichel's numbers were against NCAA teams as a 16/17 year old with the US U-18 team, but Matthews produced at about 1.3/1.4 PPG level against NCAA hockey teams in his pre-draft year. Eichel produced at a 1.78 clip in his draft year.
I find it funny how far one side you have gone regarding Matthews and Eichel in just a span of 3 months. That quote of yours I put above was after the WJCs, no less. C'mon TWS/Interactif
Okay everyone. Eichel was outscored by Matthews on the US team, yes. But his catapult to Tavares/Stamkos level prospect came in his predraft season in the NCAA, which was more impressive by eye and by NHL scoring equivalence than Matthews' draft season this year, which he went through months older than Eichel was during his. THAT is when Eichel separated himself a bit, and THAT is why he would have gone second had they been in the same draft.
But - and you're going to have to trust me on this - it's not. At least not if the subject is who will go No. 1 overall in the 2015 NHL Draft: Connor McDavid or Jack Eichel.
I find it hard to understand you would find my position funny, not unless you have a persecution complex that I am being unfair to Matthews?
I posted when I read the constant narrative that Matthews has outproduced Eichel at every level. This is a deceptive statement IMO. A statement that needed to be challenged when both have not even shared the identical same path to the NHL nor has one even played in the NHL just yet.
I also challenged the assertion Matthews would have gone ahead of a 18 year old Hobey Baker winner in Eichel had he made the cut off of the 2015 draft where in addition 2 expert sources said he would likely not have. Now I have said if one wants to say they are in the same ball park as prospects, I will not diaagree. But he was never higher rated than Eichel nor has he outproduced him at every level.
Finally I will say this. Matthews is terrific prospect. He is going to be a great building block for either Winnipeg or Toronto. He is a center that all good teams could use. One of these teams will be very happy.
Prove where bracco out preformed eichel lol
How scared should Leaf fans be that Matthews bolts in 7 years, even if TO is a consistent contender? Thats my biggest fear. If he was Canadian there wouldnt be that doubt.
How scared should Leaf fans be that Matthews bolts in 7 years, even if TO is a consistent contender? Thats my biggest fear. If he was Canadian there wouldnt be that doubt.
No, the funny part of your current position is arguing against posters who assert Matthews would've gone ahead of Jack, when you yourself said, just 3 months ago, that it's not unreasonable to think Matthews would've gone #2 in the 2015 draft.
You don't see an issue there? If you don't, then it's far more likely you have some sort of a complex![]()
How scared should Leaf fans be that Matthews bolts in 7 years, even if TO is a consistent contender? Thats my biggest fear. If he was Canadian there wouldnt be that doubt.
No I don't see the problem. In that thread I was making the point of the top of the 2016 draft was comparable than the 2015 draft. And I just posted, full disclosure, that if anyone wants to make a point that Matthews is in the same ballpark as Eichel, I would not take issue with this.
But it doesn't change the fact I believe Eichel would have gone ahead of Matthews if both were in the same draft last year. And again, unless posters here prove to me they are more in the know than Mckenzie and Seidel and other reputable sources. I am very comfortable in my position.
Top 3 for each draft year.
1. Mcdavid (there would be no disagreement)
2. Matthews (or Eichel)
3. Eichel (or Matthews)
4. Pujujarvi
5. Laine
6. Strome.
How scared should Leaf fans be that Matthews bolts in 7 years, even if TO is a consistent contender? Thats my biggest fear. If he was Canadian there wouldnt be that doubt.
We won't even need him because McDavid will be playing for us in 6 years. That's how this works, right?
Sorry, but it's hard to take you seriously considering how inconsistent you are. Another example from not so long ago:
Someone who had Auston going ahead not so long ago, however small the margin may be, shouldn't have a problem with another poster thinking the same. Now, they're in the same ballpark, I agree, but don't dig yourself in a deeper hole here.
Now I have said if one wants to say they are in the same ball park as prospects, I will not diaagree.