C Adam Fantilli - (2023, 3rd, CBJ) Part 2

Fraser28

Registered User
Jan 13, 2013
2,234
2,227
It’s nice to see Kent Johnson have a good preseason and first game. Hopefully he has truly turned things around after a bad year. They’ll need him and Lindstrom to both be core pieces in the coming years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ORRFForever

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
19,586
10,896
It’s nice to see Kent Johnson have a good preseason and first game. Hopefully he has truly turned things around after a bad year. They’ll need him and Lindstrom to both be core pieces in the coming years.
Agree. He had a bit of a sophomore slump. Hope for a bounce back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fraser28

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,544
21,419
MN
15:49 of ice time, playing with JVR and Labanc - both signed to basically league minimum in the last few weeks when literally no one else would take them even as a spare part - and not even PP1. What the f*** are the Jackets playing at here?
they've lost Gaudreau, laine, and Jenner from a team that wasn't overflowing with offensive talent last year. There aren't a lot of great options.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,056
16,240
15:49 of ice time, playing with JVR and Labanc - both signed to basically league minimum in the last few weeks when literally no one else would take them even as a spare part - and not even PP1. What the f*** are the Jackets playing at here?
Who else he is really supposed to play with when Jenner Laine and Gaudreau are out?
 

Dominance

99-66-4-9-87/97
Sep 30, 2017
7,888
12,472
The Land of Hockey
Who else he is really supposed to play with when Jenner Laine and Gaudreau are out?
Chinakov and Johnson, obviously. With 100% offensive zone starts.

Kent Johnson? Or instead of loading Chinakhov and Marchenko with Monahan split them and give Fantilli someone to work with. Right now they have a soon to be 20 year old and a 21 year old being asked to lead their own lines.
With literal league rejects, in Fantilli’s case.
 

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,160
8,073
C-137
Chinakov and Johnson, obviously. With 100% offensive zone starts.


With literal league rejects, in Fantilli’s case.
So we have all of our top talent on one line and let the others get ran over? It's about spreading out the talent and putting kids with guys who have been around. This season isn't strictly about point production, it's about learning to play the right way.
 

Dominance

99-66-4-9-87/97
Sep 30, 2017
7,888
12,472
The Land of Hockey
So we have all of our top talent on one line and let the others get ran over? It's about spreading out the talent and putting kids with guys who have been around. This season isn't strictly about point production, it's about learning to play the right way.
This season is a complete write-off for the Jackets. Here’s a thought - the guys you drafted to score can learn to “play the right way” (i.e., score) by gaining chemistry together in as many offensive zone situations as you can give them. Not lugging rejects around.
 

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,160
8,073
C-137
This season is a complete write-off for the Jackets. Here’s a thought - the guys you drafted to score can learn to “play the right way” (i.e., score) by gaining chemistry together in as many offensive zone situations as you can give them. Not lugging rejects around.
Putting a bunch of kids together doesn't automatically mean they are getting prime offensive looks, and giving them offensive looks only doesn't help them round out their game.

They want them to be two way guys not defensive liabilities. Once again, it's teaching them to play the right way all over the ice, not just putting up numbers.
 

squashmaple

gudbranson apologist
Sponsor
Sep 24, 2022
1,910
3,434
Columbus
Putting a bunch of kids together doesn't automatically mean they are getting prime offensive looks, and giving them offensive looks only doesn't help them round out their game.

They want them to be two way guys not defensive liabilities. Once again, it's teaching them to play the right way all over the ice, not just putting up numbers.
You're forgetting the most important thing: if Columbus does it, it's wrong, and it's other fanbases' mandate to remind us silly billies of that. Doesn't matter what "it" is.
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,538
12,952
Canada
Putting a bunch of kids together doesn't automatically mean they are getting prime offensive looks, and giving them offensive looks only doesn't help them round out their game.

They want them to be two way guys not defensive liabilities. Once again, it's teaching them to play the right way all over the ice, not just putting up numbers.
Is Fantilli with JVR and Labanc teaching him to play the right way by covering up all the major warts those 2 have? KJ-Fantilli chemistry would have massive short term and long term benefits
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aaaarrgghh

tunnelvision

Registered User
Jul 31, 2021
2,897
3,195
Since they seem to project him as a center long-term I hope his defensive positioning and breakout/transition game will improve this year. I'm less worried about scoring numbers, or what kind of "chemistry" he will have in the offensive zone with certain linemates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBJx614

CBJx614

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 25, 2012
16,160
8,073
C-137
Is Fantilli with JVR and Labanc teaching him to play the right way by covering up all the major warts those 2 have? KJ-Fantilli chemistry would have massive short term and long term benefits
Yes, JVR might not be the player that he once was, but he's still a respected veteran whose played more NHL hockey than Fantilli has ever dreamed of. There's more to being an NHLer than producing.

Once again, this season isn't about getting the perfect combinations to maximize offensive production, it's about putting the kids in the best situations for their long term development.

If Gaudreau, Jenner and Voronkov were in the lineups, I would have a different attitude towards it, but when the roster makeup is what it is, you have to make sure the lineup isnt just one skilled line and a bunch of other lines getting run over because there's no skill on them.
 

FlyguyOX

Registered User
Jun 29, 2018
4,217
4,203
This is the problem for young talents with rebuilding.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure the CBJ were actually intentionally rebuilding.
 

Waterbuf

Registered User
Sep 21, 2018
916
1,140
Vancouver
Yeah I mean we know what happened with Gaudreau. That's going to leave a massive hole in the lineup no matter how you try to scramble.
Laine demanded a trade.
Jenner got injured for most of the season.
Voronkov too.
Brindley out too.

They're going to be running on fumes for awhile.
 

ORRFForever

Registered User
Oct 29, 2018
19,586
10,896
Yeah I mean we know what happened with Gaudreau. That's going to leave a massive hole in the lineup no matter how you try to scramble.
Laine demanded a trade.
Jenner got injured for most of the season.
Voronkov too.
Brindley out too.

They're going to be running on fumes for awhile.
What a mess.

If Gaudreau...
It's sad to see posters refer to him in the past tense.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,056
16,240
Kent Johnson? Or instead of loading Chinakhov and Marchenko with Monahan split them and give Fantilli someone to work with. Right now they have a soon to be 20 year old and a 21 year old being asked to lead their own lines.
Chinakov and Johnson, obviously. With 100% offensive zone starts.


With literal league rejects, in Fantilli’s case.
Johnson had 6g /10 A in 42 games last season. Spent time in the AHL

Chinakov had 16g/29pts in 53 games

JVR 11g/38pts in 71 games

Labanc sucked ass but was a consistent 30+ pts guy before

There isn’t some major gap in their resumes to date
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad