Barkov is better than Zibanejad. Aho is better than Lindholm. Lundell is better than old Bäckström, I mean give Lundell Ovechkin and then come back
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d90/10d9034f00ff93d62711ca9ed1272c292dc0dd91" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Hintz is clearly better than EP.
Saros- just as good as Markström. Husso and Kähkönen are better than your reserves, which makes us stronger. Do you understand? Better system and coaches. 3-1 Finland.
Funny thing is you've not learnt anything from Finlands success these last years. Give me your best "4 scoring lines", that's not how it works. I wouldn't mind a responsible Puljujärvi, Lundell, Kapanen or Anttila in a winning team. There is other things in hockey as well, BP and such things as balanced teams. Also, a lot of ur centers are able to play on the wing.
Laine-Barkov-Rantanen ( That on it's own will beat Sweden no matter what you have to offer)
Hintz-Aho-Teräväinen (Bye, bye)
Granlund-Lundell-Puljujärvi (Give me a more well balanced third line than that from Sweden)
Kapanen-Kotkaniemi-Anttila (Those wingers are perfect for the BP together with Lundell)
Björninen or Luostarinen can replace Kotkaniemi with ease or do it even better.
The thing here is? You are a stat watcher, or "Your eyes don´t lie" watcher. So It doesn't even matter what anyone writes because you think hockey is only about having the best scorers and offensive D ´s. Good for you.