Proposal: Buffalo - Vancouver

go4hockey

Registered User
Oct 14, 2007
6,216
2,469
Alta Loma CA
To be fair, if there was no off-ice element, this would be highway robbery for Vancouver. You'd be getting the two best players.

But in real life there is off ice element and Kane is a nightmare off the ice and has been that person in two different cities now. And in no world is Kane>Tanev unless your talking about Pat Kane.
 

Aladyyn

they praying for the death of a rockstar
Apr 6, 2015
18,348
7,696
Czech Republic
But in real life there is off ice element and Kane is a nightmare off the ice and has been that person in two different cities now. And in no world is Kane>Tanev unless your talking about Pat Kane.

More like an annoyance, people sure like using strong words though
 

Canadian Canuck

Hughes4Calder
Jul 30, 2013
14,228
3,973
Kamloops BC
Huge no from Vancouver. Would give up one of Tanev /Juolevi for Risto not both. And no thank you to Kane unless Sbisa/Dorsett is going the other way
 

hizzoner

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 19, 2006
4,003
1,103
Risto will be better than either of the Canucks. Canucks need D and cannot afford to give up a starter and their best young D prospect. Neither team likes the deal.
 

clownfat

Registered User
Jan 7, 2013
23
0
To be fair, if there was no off-ice element, this would be highway robbery for Vancouver. You'd be getting the two best players.

This! How do you not understand your own reasoning when making this proposal? Buffalo would NEVER do this because Vancouver gets the two best players on the ice, which is where hockey games in the NHL are actually won.
 

eviohh26*

Guest
Both teams curse 1 another and hang the phone up. Well Buff trys to give us Kane for free but Jim tells Buff to eat his shorts.
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,387
2,377
This! How do you not understand your own reasoning when making this proposal? Buffalo would NEVER do this because Vancouver gets the two best players on the ice, which is where hockey games in the NHL are actually won.

Uh huh yah.... Do you know who Chris Tanev is???
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,387
2,377
No ignorance. He is not better than Ristolainen.

Ok do all of us a favour, don't base your opinion on stats alone, they don't tell the whole story ya know? As a Dman stopping the other team from scoring and keeping the puck out of your end is very important, that's how hockey works bud, did ya know that?
 

DJN21

Registered User
Aug 8, 2011
9,966
3,266
Rochester
Ok do all of us a favour, don't base your opinion on stats alone, they don't tell the whole story ya know? As a Dman stopping the other team from scoring and keeping the puck out of your end is very important, that's how hockey works bud, did ya know that?

Yeah he's really not better than risto. And if he is it's only for about one more year before he falls behind. Easy pass as a sabres fan.
 

haseoke39

Registered User
Mar 29, 2011
13,938
2,492
I'd need to follow Tanev more closely to say yes or no. There's some press out there calling him the best defensive defenseman in hockey. So if I believed the hype, the answer would be yes.

Otherwise, you can take Kane out and the analysis is the same. Risto is our 1D by a wide margin and he's untouchable for any combination of lesser players.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,800
16,303
Kane is well on his to having the same value in the marketplace as Zack Kassian....so why would the Canucks trade their best current d-man and their blueline future to acquire him?
 

haseoke39

Registered User
Mar 29, 2011
13,938
2,492
Kane is well on his to having the same value in the marketplace as Zack Kassian....so why would the Canucks trade their best current d-man and their blueline future to acquire him?

Kane is like 7% of the value here
 

Blitzago*

Registered User
Dec 11, 2015
5,455
3
Both teams curse 1 another and hang the phone up. Well Buff trys to give us Kane for free but Jim tells Buff to eat his shorts.

Lets be real, If buffalo called and tried to drop Kane on benning, he'd give up atleast a 5th.
 

Der Jaeger

Generational EBUG
Feb 14, 2009
18,151
15,011
Cair Paravel
No way from Buffalo's perspective. Ristolainen has #1D potential and showed a lot of what he can do this past season. For those looking at advanced stats, please understand the context which he was used. Bylsma even conceded this off-season that he gave Ristolainen too many tough minutes all season long. His partner was also Josh Gorges.

I'd also not do this right now from Vancouver's perspective. Kane's value is crap right now. Vancouver could use Kane's playing style in their line-up, and he's a LW. But I'm taking Kane on as a risk if I were Benning. Not right now, at least.

If I were Buffalo, hope that the legal situation clears up and it's well in Kane's favor (unfounded charges). Then let him play a season and do well. Then revisit a trade to Vancouver.
 

lifeisruff

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
1,854
70
wny
I'm tired so I read the proposal like this, thoughts in parentheses

Kane for Tanev
(ok seen that before, wait...)

Kane for Tanev and Juolevi

(wait what!)

Ristolainen and Kane for Tanev and Juolevi

(NO FRIGGEN WAY)

Tanev is underrated and I expect Juolevi to be good, but Risto is the best player in this trade, by a lot probably.

Why Buffalo basically rewinds the clock on defense (to say nothing of the risk Buffalo takes with Juolevi, busting or falling short of expectations) confuses me.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad