gabevh3
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2005
- 4,353
- 3,542
Ah yes the usualhe's on the rangers so people act like he's garbage
Ah yes the usualhe's on the rangers so people act like he's garbage
Maybe there's some other smaller parts moving to balance things out. But of the younger forwards I think it's Helenius->Ostlund->Kulich.
Helenius for Trocheck would be awful and unwind Jarmo's goodwill from yesterday.
Ostlund would need to have NYR throw in something decent.
Kulich; eh I dunno.
ironically the rangers are such a mess you can probably pencil in a 10-15% points bump once you get him out of thereAh yes the usual
So you're saying trading tro would be addition by subtraction?ironically the rangers are such a mess you can probably pencil in a 10-15% points bump once you get him out of there
Some might even have better careers than Trocheck.All three of these players will be fortunate to have the career Trocheck has and continues to enjoy. Doubly so if they are competing with each until age 24 for ice time in Buffalo due to all the youth there.
Probably better you keep Trochek than, why trade him for career 4 point and 24 point players.Yes Helenius with his career high of 4 points and Kulich with his career high of 24 points are "much better" then Trochek.![]()
again, this isn't rangers fans wanting to trade him. the sabres reportedly have interest. begone with this pointless sass.Probably better you keep Trochek than, why trade him for career 4 point and 24 point players.
no im saying 50 points for nyr is 58 somewhere else.So you're saying trading tro would be addition by subtraction?
You forgot Carrick. Still have him for next season.Do they? We’ve still Thompson, Doan, Benson, Helenius, Ostlund, Norris, Kulich, McLeod, Zucker, Quinn, and Krebs. Buffalo has no shortage of young forwards ready to step up and eat Tuch’s minutes. D is where I’d have my focus if I was Jarmo.
You are smoking so much weed if you think you could get any one of those two players for VinnyNo biggie, we’ll hold onto Tro then, try and convince Larkin to come over.
You are smoking so much weed if you think you could get any one of those two players for Vinny
Or the 20th, 2nd round pick + Levi as Quick is no longer their backup. I'd be surprised if they trade Krebs, coach's pet.They view Kulich as a first liner. Rangers would be the ones adding in such a deal, not Buffalo. Trocheck is insurance for Kulich.
Could see something like 20th overall, Krebs, Wahlberg
Actually McLeod and Norris are both around 50%. It's Tage and Ostlund who drag the team average down by a lot. Carrick should be healthy again by the time the season starts, he's around 55% so it isn't as dismal if Tage is put on the wing.I'd put him behind every center not named Krebs and equal to McLeod. The only thing he excels at that the other guys don't is faceoffs. If that's your measuring stick, then sure.
Throw in Levi to replace Quick.This all day.
Look, if the Sabres are trading for Trochek....I think it's fait accompli that 20 OA WILL be part of the return. The debate is "How much is Buffalo adding to it?"
Personally, I wouldn't add much more than 20 OA. Certainly nothing ofThrany significance. Want Krebs? Sure. Want a guy like Gavin McCarthy? Fine. But nothing of significance.
But that's me.
Serious recency bias here. Before he had blood clots and missed most of the season, Kulich was the clear top prospect.
Jarmo may have his warts but losing trades hasn't been one of them.I feel like Ostlund(as much as I love his game) makes the most sense here. Assuming NYR wants a high end NHL ready Center, or maybe Jiri Kulich? Idk what else they'd add, they have more than enough cap to retain Norris as well tho i wouldn't be shocked if he was added in due to the durability concerns and NYR might want a guy like that to replace vinny and we know norris is a good player when actually playing lol.
I don't see a world where buffalo moves helenius in a trochek deal or 4th overall for that matter...... tho.....with how this week has gone, who knows lol.
Or maybe something with 20th overall and some B level prospects like Anton wahlberg? idk, i'm probably way off with this one haha
Jarmo may have his warts but losing trades hasn't been one of them.
I could see 20th, McLeod and a prospect, possibly Levi to replace Quick. Not familiar with NYR goalie depth.i didn't suggest helenius. im not insisting on helenius. i'm not insisting on anything except "45th and B tier prospect is not in line with historic comps for player"
Garand played down the stretch (just resigned 2 year deal. His job to lose as of now Levi has to go through waivers? McLeod would replace Carrick. Is McLeod a good skater? Rangers need to upgrade skating and speed on the roster as well as an organization need. Trocheck is worth more than 20th in this market with the lack of centers. Def worth a top 10 pick.I could see 20th, McLeod and a prospect, possibly Levi to replace Quick. Not familiar with NYR goalie depth.
Jarmo was willing to move Mrtka for Parakyo or Thomas. Doubtful he'd do it for middle C.A lot more reasonable.
We know Jarmo is willing to move Mrtka. 20 + Mrtka + Krebs still seems rich to me, but it wouldn’t shock me.
I'm hanging my hat on how well he's done so far this off-season and thinking it's not going to go off the rails now.As a Sabres fan It’s not the ask I mind, actually, I’m indifferent to what the Rangers want in return. My only concern is what Jarmo is willing to give, and judging by the lack of announced trade, I’d say he’s not willing to give the ask. Which makes me relieved.
McLeod is a great skater and excellent on the PK.Garand played down the stretch (just resigned 2 year deal. His job to lose as of now Levi has to go through waivers? McLeod would replace Carrick. Is McLeod a good skater? Rangers need to upgrade skating and speed on the roster as well as an organization need. Trocheck is worth more than 20th in this market with the lack of centers. Def worth a top 10 pick.
I could see 20th, McLeod and a prospect, possibly Levi to replace Quick. Not familiar with NYR goalie depth.
A number of Buffalo fans still have emotional bruises from proposals deranged strangers made on the internet many years ago (and one mouth breathing podcaster even bought a billboard)Admittedly I don’t watch much of Trocheck, but I don’t see what people are talking about saying he’s started his decline or that he’s a 3C. His 82 game pace was in the 20G-45A range last season. Those are great 2C numbers and passable as a 1C. With the way contracts are going, I feel like he’s as safe as an acquisition you can make. Even if his offense falls off, he’s still a defensively responsible center that’s great on the dot. At his cap hit, he’s unlikely to ever be a bad contract. It’s why I’d rather the Wild target him over Larkin.