Proposal: - Buffalo-Minnesota | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
Toggle sidebar

Proposal: Buffalo-Minnesota

is the answer jesus said:
I'd love to simplify the deal around just Brodin.
As for those guys in particular, McLeod I wouldn't say is untouchable because that would be ridiculous, but he fills a significant role in our lineup that we just dont have a replacement for, I'd be surprised if he moves. With Tuch I could see it go either way. He's either happy in WNY and would like to stick around in which case we re-sign him. The other option being he makes it clear he wants to go to a contender and Buffalo facilitates that. Unfortunately there hasn't been a whole lot of information on that front.
Click to expand...
What would you offer for just Brodin? My primary target as a Wild fan has been Peterka; is there a deal to be made around the two with the Wild adding?

McLeod/Tuch being mentioned was more gauging whether they would be available or not. I know Sabres fans love Tuch. The Wild losing him in expansion was awful. McLeod had a nice breakout season. Does he play 2C or 3C on Buffalo?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL
DigitalBoldy said:
What would you offer for just Brodin? My primary target as a Wild fan has been Peterka; is there a deal to be made around the two with the Wild adding?

McLeod/Tuch being mentioned was more gauging whether they would be available or not. I know Sabres fans love Tuch. The Wild losing him in expansion was awful. McLeod had a nice breakout season. Does he play 2C or 3C on Buffalo?
Click to expand...
For me? Yeah I'd probably entertain something centered around those 2. I can see some Sabres fans scoffing at the value there given the age gap between Peterka and Brodin, but right now I think that a lock down top 4 defenseman is our biggest need. Peterka would certainly be down the list of guys I'd want to move to land that type of player, but I don't know how many players of Brodin's ilk are on the market for draft picks or prospects. I'd certainly like us to pull a Fiala with Peterka and get our version of Faber, but I have zero faith in Adams to pull a deal like that off. I really have no idea what evens out a trade involving those 2 guys though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778 and SECRET SQUIRREL
McLeod is basically a non-starter because we have nobody else to fill his role.

Brodin is the exact (like, nearly perfect) piece we need. I'd give up a lot. But not Tuch, unless he's adamant that he's not re-signing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778
Uberpecker said:
Definitely not if this is the constellation.
Click to expand...

Uh....gif


I was going to ask the first poster that replied typed that all out during an earthquake.

Then you posted that and suddenly his entire seizure of a post faded out of existence.

Is it the water out there? Or something with the school system maybe? What's happening here?

[EDIT]: Nevermind. A few posts later and it all makes sense.
 
DJN21 said:
Peterka and Lafferty for Brodin and Foligno and lets all go to bed
Click to expand...
Foligno can't be had. Wild are a win now team. It's not Brodin they are trying to trade, it's Rossi, Guerin isn't letting Go of Folgino. So, nope. Foligno is wild leader and protector. he's not getting traded. Also, Foligno wants nothing to do with Buffalo, he's made thar clearly, he wants nothing to do with Buffalo, and he has a limited no trade clause, even though Guerin treats it like a full no trade clause with him,

Edit to : Foligno has full no trade clause from 25-26 then 15 team no trade from there.
 
Hockeyfan200 said:
Foligno can't be had. Wild are a win now team. It's not Brodin they are trying to trade, it's Rossi, Guerin isn't letting Go of Folgino. So, nope. Foligno is wild leader and protector. he's not getting traded. Also, Foligno wants nothing to do with Buffalo, he's made thar clearly, he wants nothing to do with Buffalo, and he has a limited no trade clause, even though Guerin treats it like a full no trade clause with him,
Click to expand...
Does saying it twice in one sentence make it a double negative? So he does wanna come home to Buffalo?
 
DJN21 said:
so it hasn't kicked in yet? So there's a chance....
Click to expand...
it has. He has it through this year, then goes down to 16 team no trade in 26-27. Foligno literally hates everything to do with Buffalo, He even openly spoke about his experience there in a shitty way. doesn't matter though because Guerin isn't trading foligno, and foligno won't waive
 
Hockeyfan200 said:
it has. He has it through this year, then goes down to 16 team no trade in 26-27. Foligno literally hates everything to do with Buffalo, He even openly spoke about his experience there in a shitty way. doesn't matter though because Guerin isn't trading foligno, and foligno won't waive
Click to expand...
are you referring to the quote above and jumping off ledges?
 
DigitalBoldy said:
:wild
JJ Peterka
Ryan McLeod or Alex Tuch (if one is more appealing to trade out for Sabres fans, lmk)

:sabres
Marco Rossi
Jonas Brodin
Riley Heidt or other value balancing piece

Trade breakdown is:
Rossi = Peterka
Brodin+Heidt = McLeod or Tuch


Feel free to comment which side needs to add or if you think it is balanced value wise. I’m a Minnesota fan, so we probably need to add.

General questions:

Are either of McLeod/Tuch available?

What is Peterka looking for on a long term contract?

Bit of an age gap between Brodin and McLeod/Tuch, so I included a prospect to offset the value in age a bit. Let me know if a different prospect works better.
Click to expand...
Peterka isn’t getting moved.
 
DigitalBoldy said:
What would you offer for just Brodin? My primary target as a Wild fan has been Peterka; is there a deal to be made around the two with the Wild adding?

McLeod/Tuch being mentioned was more gauging whether they would be available or not. I know Sabres fans love Tuch. The Wild losing him in expansion was awful. McLeod had a nice breakout season. Does he play 2C or 3C on Buffalo?
Click to expand...
If I'm moving Peterka I'd ask for Faber...not brodin.

Brodin is a left D. It only makes sense is if Buffalo traded byram/ power.
 
If I'm Minnesota and I'm looking at adding a center, I'm keeping Brodin out of the deal unless the center is not only a 2C, but a really good 2C, or young and still improving 2C. McLeod is a 3C. No dice, fair value or not. Doesn't make sense to me to move a guy that can play top pairing for a 3C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockeyfan200
Djp said:
If I'm moving Peterka I'd ask for Faber...not brodin.

Brodin is a left D. It only makes sense is if Buffalo traded byram/ power.
Click to expand...
Lol dude, Faber is Untouchable ins every aspect. There's nothing Buffalo has that could get him. He also has a complete NMC. Peterka wouldn't even get Faber lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 2, guests: 3)

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom